@valnar
> WfWG. Not DOS.
You always assume people don't read the thread they're replying to? Yes, talking about win 3.11 & wfwg.
>It supports printing, networking, floppy drive, SB16 and S3 video "out of the box."
OK, out of the box, but once out of the box, is it better, if so, how?
>It also supports hard drive images better than DOSBox
There's supporting more formats, but supporting images better? How so?
>and installation of operating systems within that image file.>
Installing other OSs isn't a notable feature for comparing running w3.11 & wfwg between dosbox & other vpcs.
@Dominus
>When you want gaming and great sound support Dosbox is it, if you want something else, then Dosbox is not up to it.
Especially networking, printing and support for office suits is not availlable in regular Dosbox, support for office suits isn't even there in special builds (it's actually support for share.exe/vshare.386 that isn't in Dosbox and will prevent the start of (probably) all the latest office programs for Win 3.x).
A first real difference, share/vshare. Are there other things like that lacking in DOSBox? I consider patches available to do networking and printing being up to it. Is VPCs networking and printing better, how so? Are the capabilities of the networking and printing for DOSBox lacking?