Reply 31440 of 31456, by such
- Rank
- Newbie
The notion of period correctness might depend on means and possibly your location (so either way means play into it), also time or times. 30 years ago I had what I had and I upgraded what I could, meaning I ended up with mutant configurations that were... the least terrible choice I could make at the time, also very much dependent on availability. Didn't really have access to affordable components since they just did not exist. Simplified things, in a manner of speaking.
Now, if back then you had access to a vast selection of pre-builts of all shapes and configurations that you could then also drop a high-end 3D accelerator or GPU into without saving for a literal year to obtain it there's a good chance you were thinking in hardware generations the way we currently are back then even outside of DIY circles. My first Pentium carried me for *many* hardware generations, and I couldn't afford - literally - to consider, say, bottlenecks or optimal upgrade paths whenever I was even able upgrade.
Then, there's hindsight. Much easier to think in "period correctness" now when you sort of have all of those components available, and definitely well catalogued, benchmarked etc. You can theorycraft on an infinite scale before you even physically assemble anything. So roughly the "kids now have it so much easier and they don't even know it!" option.
Personally, I'm too not strict about period accuracy, but I do draw some lines per taste, like DOS on P4 is just pointless to me at best. If this were my only option, like I imagine it can be to some for a variety of reasons, I wouldn't mind it, because eh, if it works it works at that point. Plus nostalgia can be a factor. XP I'm having a hard time considering as retro, so my XP box is basically the maximum I was able to stick into it sans SLI, because screw that, not worth the hassle.
