Reply 20 of 32, by PhilsComputerLab
- Rank
- l33t++
wrote:good job but i test quake a bit differently. i used a more intensive bigass demo which is about 25% slower than quake's builtin […]
wrote:Excel version attached!
good job but i test quake a bit differently. i used a more intensive bigass demo which is about 25% slower than quake's builtin demos, and i used winquake which may provide better performance than the dos version, especially on newer computers.
you can also have a look at my tests here:
my socket7 cpu benchmark results
The benchmark results are to compare relative performance between systems. The idea is for others to compare their systems with entries in the database to see if the machine performs on the expected level or if there are any issues.