VOGONS


Tillamook 266MHz and working L2 cache?

Topic actions

Reply 140 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Quick follow up: GA-586HX (430HX) also working!

Reply 141 of 517, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
LeFlash wrote:
Anonymous Coward wrote:
feipoa wrote:

Nice! Any chance this mod will make the CPU/cache work in a 430TX board?

I'm waiting for the answer to this one too.

Give me a board and i'll report 😉

All I can do is add it to my list, which is approaching infinity. So many other things have a higher priority though. I'm sure someone else will this hardware combination will get to it before me.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 142 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Right now i can say that the VIA MVP3 and the 430HX work. So the TX should, in theory, work too.
But it depends on the BIOS as well. I've got 2 industrial PC cards with the 430HX, there the CPU doesn't even post.

Reply 143 of 517, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

If I recall, my 430TX boards wouldn't even show signs of life with the Tillimock installed.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 144 of 517, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
LeFlash wrote:

Quick follow up: GA-586HX (430HX) also working!

With L2 cache on? That would be a first for a 430 chipset.

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium

Reply 145 of 517, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Speedsys graph?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 146 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Anonymous Coward wrote:
LeFlash wrote:

Quick follow up: GA-586HX (430HX) also working!

With L2 cache on? That would be a first for a 430 chipset.

Yes, of course!

Speedsys graph follows, have to mod the board before doing extensive tests because its lowest voltage is way to high for the CPU.

Reply 147 of 517, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Am I understanding this correctly - if one mods the cpu as shown then there's a chance that it runs in an SS7 board with functioning cache?

Reply 148 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Yep. That's what i was trying to tell everyone. I checked with an unmodded vs. modded CPU and it solves the problem of L2 cache, as long as the mobo bios detects the CPU (which nearly every bios should do)

Reply 149 of 517, by GL1zdA

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Any chance this will work in a dual cpu setup? Or did Intel cut the local APIC from the Tillamooks?

getquake.gif | InfoWorld/PC Magazine Indices

Reply 150 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Dual-CPU is impossible because the needed lines are simply NC.

smp.PNG

Reply 151 of 517, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
LeFlash wrote:

Yep. That's what i was trying to tell everyone. I checked with an unmodded vs. modded CPU and it solves the problem of L2 cache, as long as the mobo bios detects the CPU (which nearly every bios should do)

Excellent news.

Reply 152 of 517, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

amadeus, are you able to test this mod in a 430FX, 430VX, or 430TX board?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 153 of 517, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
feipoa wrote:

amadeus, are you able to test this mod in a 430FX, 430VX, or 430TX board?

I do not know which chipsets I have, there are 5 S(S)7 boards in the storage - at least one bearing an SiS5591 chipset. I also have to buy the Tillamooks since I didn't follow through originally due to not being sure about optimal performance.

Should I be able to gather some data, then YES.

Reply 154 of 517, by LeFlash

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Ok guys, another one.
This time: 112MHz x 3.5 => 392MHz

Quake Timedemo over 80fps, even with 640x480 over 20fps!

Board is a FIC VA503+ this time - only board i had on hand with >100MHz

20180816_170037_resized.jpg
20180816_170105_resized.jpg
20180816_170206_resized.jpg

Reply 155 of 517, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Goodbye, AMD K6-III...

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 156 of 517, by RichB93

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Holy crap! These are some tasty chips now that L2 is working.

Reply 157 of 517, by amadeus777999

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Nice juicy score - good to see this awesome core shine.

Reply 158 of 517, by Nemo1985

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
LeFlash wrote:
Ok guys, another one. This time: 112MHz x 3.5 => 392MHz […]
Show full quote

Ok guys, another one.
This time: 112MHz x 3.5 => 392MHz

Quake Timedemo over 80fps, even with 640x480 over 20fps!

Board is a FIC VA503+ this time - only board i had on hand with >100MHz

Is this a 266mhz oc to 392, right?

Reply 159 of 517, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I wonder if the chip is long term stable at 350 MHz. That would make for a desirable setup.

EDIT: I predict a 430TX board, if it will work with this chip, will score about 20.x FPS in software Quake at 640x480 when run at 83.3x3.5, or 292 MHz.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.