VOGONS

Great PC! But can it run Crysis?

Topic actions

Reply 140 of 241, by Kamerat

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
ynari wrote:

Here you go. My monitor is only 1600x1200 but it scales, and the CRT is disconnected at the mo.

Still, for those of you that can't remember my system specs : spot the oddity in this screenshot..

Virtualized? Guess QEMU/KVM.

DOS Sound Blaster compatibility: PCI sound cards vs. PCI chipsets
YouTube channel

Reply 141 of 241, by Kamerat

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Munx wrote:
Kamerat wrote:

Installed Catalyst 10.2 and increased FPS avrage with about 10.

crysis_9700pro_cat10.2.PNG

Avrage: 38.34 FPS

Considering 9700 pro is below the minimum requirements, that's pretty good

Agree, and the cpu isn't much over the minimum P4 2.8GHz

Tried running the 9700 Pro @ 405MHz/358MHz and got the avrage of 42.72FPS (the GPU is voltmodded and got a copper cooler).

28.07.2015 06:19:19 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 800x600, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Low
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 49.20s, Average FPS: 40.65
    Min FPS: 26.69 at frame 1959, Max FPS: 68.89 at frame 997
    Average Tri/Sec: 16093673, Tri/Frame: 395919
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.32
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 45.85s, Average FPS: 43.62
    Min FPS: 26.69 at frame 1959, Max FPS: 68.89 at frame 997
    Average Tri/Sec: 17471486, Tri/Frame: 400511
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.29
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 45.56s, Average FPS: 43.90
    Min FPS: 26.69 at frame 1959, Max FPS: 68.89 at frame 81
    Average Tri/Sec: 17594722, Tri/Frame: 400803
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.29
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

DOS Sound Blaster compatibility: PCI sound cards vs. PCI chipsets
YouTube channel

Reply 142 of 241, by ynari

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Kamerat wrote:
ynari wrote:

Here you go. My monitor is only 1600x1200 but it scales, and the CRT is disconnected at the mo.

Still, for those of you that can't remember my system specs : spot the oddity in this screenshot..

Virtualized? Guess QEMU/KVM.

*ding*. Yes, virtualised - in Xen. The most glaring clue to my mind is that it's running a quad core CPU with only three cores..

I'll post the bare metal results later - they're not much better, as the limiting factor is the x4 PCI-e 1.0 slot. The memory type still isn't recognised, although the SPD works.

Reply 143 of 241, by ynari

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

OK, Crysis on the bare metal - same PC. As you can see it's not very different.

Disappointingly, on my main gaming PC (weaker CPU, but GPU running at full speed), it's not /that/ much faster. If I take it down to 1600x1200 it only gives 33FPS average, 44FPS at 1280x1024

Reply 144 of 241, by DosFreak

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Ran all three

#1
Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 103.075
#2
Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 72.35
#3
Run #1- DX9 800x600 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Overall Average FPS: 179.865

#1

8/29/2015 8:34:15 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 22.84s, Average FPS: 87.55
    Min FPS: 64.44 at frame 172, Max FPS: 130.57 at frame 1679
    Average Tri/Sec: 86199776, Tri/Frame: 984579
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 19.43s, Average FPS: 102.93
    Min FPS: 64.44 at frame 172, Max FPS: 132.54 at frame 1733
    Average Tri/Sec: 102469624, Tri/Frame: 995509
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 19.38s, Average FPS: 103.22
    Min FPS: 64.44 at frame 172, Max FPS: 136.94 at frame 139
    Average Tri/Sec: 102851312, Tri/Frame: 996395
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/29/2015 8:34:15 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 103.075


#2

8/29/2015 8:36:52 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1920x1080, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 34.94s, Average FPS: 57.24
    Min FPS: 47.70 at frame 1974, Max FPS: 93.28 at frame 1014
    Average Tri/Sec: -17444478, Tri/Frame: -304761
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.01
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 27.67s, Average FPS: 72.28
    Min FPS: 47.70 at frame 1974, Max FPS: 95.31 at frame 1660
    Average Tri/Sec: -20948400, Tri/Frame: -289822
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.16
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 27.62s, Average FPS: 72.42
    Min FPS: 47.68 at frame 1968, Max FPS: 97.87 at frame 99
    Average Tri/Sec: -20991934, Tri/Frame: -289850
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.16
…Show last 46 lines
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/29/2015 8:36:52 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 72.35


#3

8/29/2015 8:39:30 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 800x600, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Low
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 16.63s, Average FPS: 120.29
    Min FPS: 154.99 at frame 1367, Max FPS: 233.65 at frame 1033
    Average Tri/Sec: 48860656, Tri/Frame: 406203
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.26
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 11.12s, Average FPS: 179.80
    Min FPS: 138.56 at frame 1167, Max FPS: 233.65 at frame 1033
    Average Tri/Sec: 73674640, Tri/Frame: 409756
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.24
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 11.12s, Average FPS: 179.93
    Min FPS: 137.75 at frame 1984, Max FPS: 233.65 at frame 1033
    Average Tri/Sec: 73734360, Tri/Frame: 409792
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.24
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/29/2015 8:39:30 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 800x600 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Overall Average FPS: 179.865

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Make your games work offline

Reply 145 of 241, by PhilsComputerLab

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

100+ FPS! Wow, nicely done 😀

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 146 of 241, by squareguy

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

My new Windows XP DirectX 9.0 build with Celeron CPU, will test again when I get the i5! I'm happy with it!

DirectX 9.0c Build, Stealth - Large Pics

1280x1024

The attachment 1280-crysis.JPG is no longer available

1600x1200

The attachment 1600-crysis.JPG is no longer available

Gateway 2000 Case and 200-Watt PSU
Intel SE440BX-2 Motherboard
Intel Pentium III 450 CPU
Micron 384MB SDRAM (3x128)
Compaq Voodoo3 3500 TV Graphics Card
Turtle Beach Santa Cruz Sound Card
Western Digital 7200-RPM, 8MB-Cache, 160GB Hard Drive
Windows 98 SE

Reply 147 of 241, by havli

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Few more results, all of them using following system and DX9 1280x1024 high settings.

Pentium G2130
2 GB DDR3 1066 Mhz
Asrock H61MV-ITX
Windows XP SP3

Radeon HD 2600 XT -> 12.4 fps
hd_2600_xt_crysis4qood.png

GeForce 8800 GT -> 38.88 fps
8800_gt_crysissmoyo.png

Radeon HD 4830 -> 36.65 fps
hd4830_crysislqr7o.png

Radeon HD 5770 -> 62.44 fps
hd5770_crysish3pda.png

Radeon HD 5850 -> 80.96 fps (Most likely CPU limited)
hd5850_crysismeo2x.png

HW museum.cz - my collection of PC hardware

Reply 148 of 241, by tayyare

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Main Rig - Core2 Quad Q9550, 4GB, Windows 7 32 bit, Geforce GTX 560 Ti 1GB:

The attachment Clip_30.jpg is no longer available

XP Box - Opteron 180, 4GB, Windowx XP SP3, Geforce GTS 250 1GB: (there was no "very high" option, it only had "high")

The attachment Clip.jpg is no longer available

Daughter's PC - Phenom II X6 1090T, 8GB, Windows 10 Pro 64Bit, Geforce GT 710 2GB

The attachment Clip.jpg is no longer available

What's wrong with this one? Why such small frame rates? Is GT710 such a bad card? What am I doing wrong?

Last edited by tayyare on 2016-03-29, 12:52. Edited 2 times in total.

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 149 of 241, by agent_x007

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

U aren't doing anything wrong.
GT 710 is just second slowest 7xx series card.
It's got 96SP with 128bit bus and (G)DDR3 memory.

U should know that GT 710 is between 8600 GT(S) and 9600 GT in terms of performance (and closer to the former since 710 has got same 128bit bus width).

157143230295.png

Reply 150 of 241, by tayyare

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
agent_x007 wrote:
U aren't doing anything wrong. GT 710 is just second slowest 7xx series card. It's got 96SP with 128bit bus and (G)DDR3 memory. […]
Show full quote

U aren't doing anything wrong.
GT 710 is just second slowest 7xx series card.
It's got 96SP with 128bit bus and (G)DDR3 memory.

U should know that GT 710 is between 8600 GT(S) and 9600 GT in terms of performance (and closer to the former since 710 has got same 128bit bus width).

Wow, thanks a lot for the heads up. I knew it was kind of a "value" product when I first buy it, but have no idea it has a performance that bad. I will retry the test with same resolution/detail level I used to test for my XP box and see if it is even worse than a GTS250 on a socket 939 CPU. 🤣

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 151 of 241, by PhilsComputerLab

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It should be.

GTS 250 is basically the 9800GTX+

BTW nice to see some new Crysis results guys 😀

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 152 of 241, by tayyare

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
PhilsComputerLab wrote:

It should be.

GTS 250 is basically the 9800GTX+

BTW nice to see some new Crysis results guys 😀

🤣 This is actually my first benchmark that I ever performed since the S3trio era (1994-5?) I, in general, hate benchmarks under normal conditions. 😊

I have another machine that supposed to "run" Crysis, my HTPC with core2 duo E8400 and ATI HD5450, running Windows 7 32 bit. Will it worth to try or 5450 is just too slow?

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 153 of 241, by PhilsComputerLab

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I think it's a bit slow 😀

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 154 of 241, by ODwilly

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid= … eon-hd-5450-2gb this site is not perfect for GPU comparisons but I like to use it to give me a general idea before finding actual benchmarks 😀

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1

Reply 155 of 241, by RoyBatty

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

aFMZeMw.png

Finally

Reply 156 of 241, by agent_x007

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

CPU Bottlenecking 1.01 with Pentium 4/486 and a special guest - NV GTX graphics card 😀
FPS : Min. | Max. | Avg.

GPU Chillin' "U don't need me..."
Low : 61,79 | 121,66 | 92,61

The attachment Crysis%20demo%20low.png is no longer available

GPU is like "U want something ?"
High : 27,97 | 74,12 | 48,49

The attachment Crysis%20demo%20high%20dx9.png is no longer available

"GPU Is not impressed."
Very High : 22,61 | 51,08 | 37,38

The attachment Crysis%20demo%20vhigh%20dx10.png is no longer available

GPU "We FINALLY getting somewhere 😀"
Very High w/AA : 21,36 | 43,71 | 33,99

The attachment Crysis%20demo%20vhigh%20dx10%2016xQ.png is no longer available

GPU is disappointed 🙁
Benchmark can't go higher (I want 4k !)

End of lesson 😀

What do we learn ?
...
This PC can indeed run Crysis 😉

157143230295.png

Reply 157 of 241, by tyuper

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
The attachment res_crysis.png is no longer available
09.04.2016 23:29:44 - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1920x1080, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 125.06s, Average FPS: 15.99
    Min FPS: 12.55 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 18.82 at frame 872
    Average Tri/Sec: -4450873, Tri/Frame: -278313
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.29
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 121.56s, Average FPS: 16.45
    Min FPS: 12.55 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 18.82 at frame 872
    Average Tri/Sec: -4361543, Tri/Frame: -265085
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.46
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 121.66s, Average FPS: 16.44
    Min FPS: 12.55 at frame 1954, Max FPS: 19.09 at frame 870
    Average Tri/Sec: -4324921, Tri/Frame: -263074
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.48
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

After "Completed All Tests" should be the result, but instead a unexpected error appeared:

Szczegółowe informacje na temat wywoływania debugowania w trybie JIT (just in time)
zamiast tego okna dialogowego znajdują się na końcu tego komunikatu.

************** Tekst wyjątku **************
System.InvalidCastException: Konwersja z ciągu "16.45
" na typ 'Double' nie jest prawidłowa. ---> System.FormatException: Nieprawidłowy format ciągu wejściowego.
   w Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Conversions.ParseDouble(String Value, NumberFormatInfo NumberFormat)
   w Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Conversions.ToDouble(String Value, NumberFormatInfo NumberFormat)
   --- Koniec śladu stosu wyjątków wewnętrznych ---
   w Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Conversions.ToDouble(String Value, NumberFormatInfo NumberFormat)
   w Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Conversions.ToDouble(String Value)
   w Benchmarktool.Form1.MakeSummary()
   w Benchmarktool.Form1.btnBegin_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mevent)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
   w System.Windows.Forms.ButtonBase.WndProc(Message& m)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Button.WndProc(Message& m)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
   w System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
   w System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)


************** Zestawy załadowane **************
mscorlib
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
Crysis Benchmark Tool
    Wersja zestawu: 1.0.0.5
    Wersja Win32: 1.0.0.5
    CodeBase: file:///D:/Gry/Crysis%20Demo/Crysis%20Benchmark%20Tool.exe
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic
    Wersja zestawu: 8.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 8.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/8.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
----------------------------------------
System
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8681 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Runtime.Remoting
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll
…Show last 17 lines
----------------------------------------
mscorlib.resources
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic.resources
    Wersja zestawu: 8.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 8.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic.resources/8.0.0.0_pl_b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.resources.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms.resources
    Wersja zestawu: 2.0.0.0
    Wersja Win32: 2.0.50727.8670 (QFE.050727-8600)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms.resources/2.0.0.0_pl_b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.resources.dll
----------------------------------------

Reply 158 of 241, by DosFreak

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Results from my new build. Nothing overclocked yet....but I think it can run Crysis. 😁
System Specs

#1
Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 151.98
#2
Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 105.91
#3
Run #1- DX9 800x600 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Overall Average FPS: 267.03

#1 

8/15/2016 7:30:13 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 19.43s, Average FPS: 102.91
    Min FPS: 80.52 at frame 199, Max FPS: 173.63 at frame 1641
    Average Tri/Sec: 100869384, Tri/Frame: 980152
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.94
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 13.13s, Average FPS: 152.28
    Min FPS: 80.52 at frame 199, Max FPS: 196.78 at frame 1785
    Average Tri/Sec: 150943584, Tri/Frame: 991207
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 13.19s, Average FPS: 151.68
    Min FPS: 80.52 at frame 199, Max FPS: 197.79 at frame 1733
    Average Tri/Sec: 150338576, Tri/Frame: 991156
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/15/2016 7:30:13 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 151.98


#2
8/15/2016 7:32:37 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 26.75s, Average FPS: 74.76
    Min FPS: 69.95 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 135.10 at frame 1688
    Average Tri/Sec: -30283592, Tri/Frame: -405081
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.26
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 18.90s, Average FPS: 105.83
    Min FPS: 69.95 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 143.22 at frame 1694
    Average Tri/Sec: -41487140, Tri/Frame: -392014
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.34
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 18.87s, Average FPS: 105.99
    Min FPS: 69.95 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 143.22 at frame 1694
    Average Tri/Sec: -41555356, Tri/Frame: -392055
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.34
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
…Show last 43 lines
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/15/2016 7:32:37 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 105.91

#3
8/15/2016 7:35:07 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 800x600, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Low
 ==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 9.32s, Average FPS: 214.52
    Min FPS: 238.99 at frame 1386, Max FPS: 301.90 at frame 1145
    Average Tri/Sec: 86949616, Tri/Frame: 405320
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.26
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 7.49s, Average FPS: 267.17
    Min FPS: 212.57 at frame 1241, Max FPS: 319.29 at frame 1027
    Average Tri/Sec: 109390216, Tri/Frame: 409443
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.24
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 7.49s, Average FPS: 266.89
    Min FPS: 212.57 at frame 1241, Max FPS: 319.29 at frame 1027
    Average Tri/Sec: 109214480, Tri/Frame: 409205
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 2.24
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

8/15/2016 7:35:07 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 800x600 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Overall Average FPS: 267.03

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Make your games work offline

Reply 159 of 241, by Logistics

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I just wanted to make a quick note about the settings. I'm assuming that changing the sound quality will affect the bits per channel and sampling rate or the audio. This concerns me as that could potentially cause some systems to have to resample the audio due to the board having a native resolution--for example: SbLive! using 16-bit @ 48kHz or perhaps 24-bit @ 96kHz, I'm just guessing, here.

But I think it's a valid concern as you don't need to be taxing the hardware in some useless way, which will affect the overall performance, in the end.

Matthew

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Back to General Old Hardware
Close window
Close window