Reply 20 of 23, by Jo22
- Rank
- l33t++
Tempest wrote on 2024-08-13, 15:00:I wouldn't call the AT a 'looker' but it has that boxy IBM style that I love for some reason. All my classic PCs are IBMs except my P4 which is a Dell.
Well, it surely has an iconic look. I'd dare to say that AT chassis and the Model M keyboard had more relevance in late 80s than an PC or PC/XT.
If we look at manuals or literature from that era, the wider AT chassis was some sort of reference. Both XT/Turbo XT and AT clones used AT style chassis, too.
And it makes sense, I think. The IBM 5170 chassis was wider, had been better suited for housing fixed disks and large expansion cards.
It also matched the width of the Model F and Model M keyboards, so it looked cleaner.
Edit: The full size keyboard variants with extra keys, I mean. There were different models.
The downside was, though, that the IBM MDA or EGA monitor looked a bit tiny in comparison.
A slightly bigger VGA monitor or multi-sync monitor in a boxy chassis would be a more fitting companion, maybe.
Tempest wrote on 2024-08-13, 15:00:Sounds like between my XT and my 486 I shouldn't have much trouble running most games (at least the ones I care about).
I'll have to look into this SETMUL program for disabling the cache, I've never heard of it before.
Well, it really depends. 🤷 If it's merely about usability, then there's no dire need for an AT.
Just like there's no need to own an original Gameboy to play old GB games.
An Gameboy Colour or Gameboy Advance SP can play them, too, even though the gaming experience is a bit different.
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//