Reply 20 of 21, by Sphere478
- Rank
- l33t++
kolmio wrote on 2024-10-05, 10:21:When there are several drives connected to the adapter, how does it decide which one to boot from?
Move the sata cables around
kolmio wrote on 2024-10-05, 10:21:When there are several drives connected to the adapter, how does it decide which one to boot from?
Move the sata cables around
Sphere478 wrote on 2024-10-06, 01:38:kolmio wrote on 2024-10-05, 10:21:When there are several drives connected to the adapter, how does it decide which one to boot from?
Move the sata cables around
Alright, so it's always the first SATA port on the card. Thanks!
Hackcell wrote on 2024-07-02, 22:49:NECRO BUMP.
Is it possible to have a SATA300 working under Windows 95?
Thanks!
I have it working just fine on Windows 98 with IDE drive cable attached to 40-pin connector on the card. Boot device in BIOS is "SCSI".
However, I can't get 250 GB SATA drive with 20 GB partition visible in Windows 98.
I even used another controller which has official 9x support. Still SATA drive is missing from Windows 98. While Windows XP boots well from it using either card.
UPDATE:
Finally, I discovered that partitions on SATA drive are visible in fdisk. Both were NTFS. I removed one and re-created with fdisk. And voila, it appeared in Windows 98 Explorer. Problem solved.
Windows 95 | Chaintech 486SPM M102.A | AMD-X5-133ADW or Am486DX4-100 | 48MB SIMM FPM | ATI Rage 3D II+DVD | CT4100 | 8GB CF
Windows 98 | Acorp 6BX86 | Pentium III 900, slotket | 512MB PC100 | Radeon 9250 | SoundForte SF16-FMI-03 | 64GB MicroSD