Reply 20 of 28, by Joseph_Joestar
- Rank
- l33t++
StriderTR wrote on 2023-07-17, 19:23:Do you, or anyone, have an honest opinion on the OPTi vs the CtT4520? I'm no audiophile, I just want good DOS compatibility and sound. 😀
You can find my full take on that OPTi card in this thread: OPTi 82C930 review
As for the CT4520, it has benefits and drawbacks compared to the OPTi, but it's a fairly nice card overall. In the end, it comes down to which games you want to play and what kind of music you prefer. For older stuff which doesn't support anything better than FM synth (e.g. Duke Nukem 2, Jill of the Jungle, Lemmings) you probably want a card that has a genuine OPL3 chip on-board. The CT4520 uses CQM instead of OPL3, and will therefore sound a bit harsher and more metallic in such games. Exactly how much varies depending on the music track in question.
For slightly newer games like Doom, Duke3D and Descent, you may appreciate the richer sounding AWE music over any kind of FM synth, whether it be CQM or OPL3. Of course, this might depend on personal preference. If you want a direct comparison, here's how Doom's E1M1 sounds with all of those:
As for digital sound, the CT4520 is fully SB16 compatible, which matters in some late DOS games like Crusader: No Remorse. On the flip side, the OPTi is only SBPro and WSS compatible. However, it has the proper SBPro low-pass filter, which is very nice for older "talkie" adventure games like Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis.