VOGONS


Is the interest in retro PC hardware decreasing?

Topic actions

Reply 200 of 204, by Shagittarius

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

As long as the centuries continue to unfold, the number of books will grow continually, and one can predict that a time will come when it will be almost as difficult to learn anything from books as from the direct study of the whole universe. It will be almost as convenient to search for some bit of truth concealed in nature as it will be to find it hidden away in an immense multitude of bound volumes.

— Denis Diderot, "Encyclopédie" (1755)
[/quote]

VIVE LA REVOLUtION!

Reply 201 of 204, by Twisted Six

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I wouldn't say interest is decreasing....but the rarer hardware is. Gobbled up by collectors like myself and many others. I have a lot of rare stuff, my favorite period is mid 90's through early 2000's. Much prior to that is pretty useless for my interests and much after just hasn't 'earned its stripes' yet. The point being, if the hardware you're insterested in building is just impossible to find; knowing you'll likely never obtain it, interest fades away.

If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.

Reply 202 of 204, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

We could just be on the cusp of another availability spike. The "well established curious dude" of age 30 to 40 who could afford to dabble in PCs 1985 though the 90s, is getting to the age of mortality or family packing them off into a care home, so their equipment may be coming on the market in the next 5 years. I think that will include a lot of engineer types who didn't buy mass market trash and kept their stuff in good order. Having said that, I guess there's a few members here who might think we're eyeballing them for a coffin fitting 🤣 but yeah, a lot of us are only a decade or two behind.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 203 of 204, by gerry

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Shagittarius wrote on 2026-03-06, 18:51:

One thing for sure , we live in a time unprecedented in history. Barring a terrible disaster we will really be the first generation in history where the common man will be remembered more clearly than even the rulers of previous ages. History was written by the few and most people are forgotten, but as the first generation in history to so fully document itself through the internet we will live on in a way no common man has ever done before.

They will still get things wrong about us but our thoughts will live on for reflection.

I have a couple business/investment ideas along these lines. If you want to invest hit me up.

I'm not even sure that's as true as it seems. How much of the internet has vanished forever? all those livestreamed lives from various video services, will they stay up forever? i cant imagine every youtube video being available 50 years from now, let alone all the other services, blogs etc. Individually, masses of data can rapidly disappear into obscurity - those people perpetually photographing everything rarely look at their own photos, other people hardly ever do and will companies really host it all in cloud for ever? I suspect a few AI training scans and a decade later and it'll start being deleted by small print provisions

Sure that still leaves a lot more detail than we have about 100 years back, even 30 years back really!

But overall, the aggregate picture of the ordinary life is captured like never before - but through the lens of the internet, not the actual day to day life of billions of people, that will leave a skewed picture of life. It will be like watching a tv drama about some period we lived through, where we think "well, it was a bit like that - but its off somehow, too much of x, too little of y, they missed a completely and added b that didn't really happen", only more skewed still.

Possibly the individual data will be gone, replaced only by 'trained' databases that have long reduced everything to generalities with occasional variances in accuracy. whatever happens the abundance of data will hinder as much as it helps form a picture of the past

the link with retro pc interest is there too, a lot of our retro pcs are not accurate examples of the past - putting XP on quad cores, 98se on a HT P4, and having everything maxxed out - all the voodoo, best graphics, masses of ram, vast hard discs and/or other solutions - thats not what i remember. these would be prohibitively expensive, and all the nocd, imaging, workarunds, hacks and other more recent patches and things weren't there either, maybe the interest in retro PCs has always had a slightly different shape from the way they were actually experienced

I'd add that its so easy not to have a retro pc and yet still experience almost all the games (and other applications) by use of patches, gog, steam, dosbox and so on that this itself might reduce interest too

Reply 204 of 204, by Ahrle

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Heh, in my experience things have exploded recently. Getting a sub-$100 retro PC is virtually impossible. Even loose P4 boards are listed for triple digits, and people seem to pay that from ended listings.

Hell, the 2013 X230i I'm typin from, barely worth cents 2-3 years ago, now goes for $70 in average condition.

Current main: Inspiron 8100, Tualatin 1133, 512MB, GF2 Go, 1600x1200, dualboot 98/XP.