Shagittarius wrote on 2026-03-06, 18:51:
One thing for sure , we live in a time unprecedented in history. Barring a terrible disaster we will really be the first generation in history where the common man will be remembered more clearly than even the rulers of previous ages. History was written by the few and most people are forgotten, but as the first generation in history to so fully document itself through the internet we will live on in a way no common man has ever done before.
They will still get things wrong about us but our thoughts will live on for reflection.
I have a couple business/investment ideas along these lines. If you want to invest hit me up.
I'm not even sure that's as true as it seems. How much of the internet has vanished forever? all those livestreamed lives from various video services, will they stay up forever? i cant imagine every youtube video being available 50 years from now, let alone all the other services, blogs etc. Individually, masses of data can rapidly disappear into obscurity - those people perpetually photographing everything rarely look at their own photos, other people hardly ever do and will companies really host it all in cloud for ever? I suspect a few AI training scans and a decade later and it'll start being deleted by small print provisions
Sure that still leaves a lot more detail than we have about 100 years back, even 30 years back really!
But overall, the aggregate picture of the ordinary life is captured like never before - but through the lens of the internet, not the actual day to day life of billions of people, that will leave a skewed picture of life. It will be like watching a tv drama about some period we lived through, where we think "well, it was a bit like that - but its off somehow, too much of x, too little of y, they missed a completely and added b that didn't really happen", only more skewed still.
Possibly the individual data will be gone, replaced only by 'trained' databases that have long reduced everything to generalities with occasional variances in accuracy. whatever happens the abundance of data will hinder as much as it helps form a picture of the past
the link with retro pc interest is there too, a lot of our retro pcs are not accurate examples of the past - putting XP on quad cores, 98se on a HT P4, and having everything maxxed out - all the voodoo, best graphics, masses of ram, vast hard discs and/or other solutions - thats not what i remember. these would be prohibitively expensive, and all the nocd, imaging, workarunds, hacks and other more recent patches and things weren't there either, maybe the interest in retro PCs has always had a slightly different shape from the way they were actually experienced
I'd add that its so easy not to have a retro pc and yet still experience almost all the games (and other applications) by use of patches, gog, steam, dosbox and so on that this itself might reduce interest too