Reply 221 of 241, by CarlHopkinsUK
wrote:GTX650 arrived and did a quick test on the same settings as before...
Quite an improvement, well worth the £30! Will be interesting to see what the switch to a X5460 will make...
Installed the X5460 tonight quickly and did another quick run. Up to 57fps from 54fps - so not quite the jump as I got from changing cards unfortunately...
Reply 222 of 241, by ynari
Found this thread agan, forgot I'd tested my XP/Windows 8 gaming box back in 2015, new result now it's up to 16GB memory (unusual for a Core2 system) - woo, 1fps increase! Yes, it can run Crysis - just.
Obviously 'XP settings' would be better, so I decided to ask the question 'Can it run Crysis in stereoscopic 3D using Tridef?'
Getting a bit slow here, dropping below 30.
However, if I leave it on XP settings and drop the stereoscopic 3D, it returns a nicely respectible 48fps average.
Going to try the shader unlock of the 6950 next, and re-run..
Reply 223 of 241, by ynari
Time to bring out the big guns
Yes, it definitely can run Crysis. Better hope so with that spec. Average of 74fps.
Bit useless for me though, as the CRT really is best at 1600x1200. At that resolution you can switch on 16xQ and still get 76fps average.
Reply 224 of 241, by agent_x007
- Rank
- Oldbie
Avg. 91,01FPS, Min. 60,81FPS...
When CPU is too slow (61% max. GPU usage 😁), you have to up the resolution.
.
.
...
.
.
OK, 2560x1600 + 16xQ and GPU still isn't maxed out all the time...
Avg. 84,5FPS (7% perf drop vs. 1080p no AA), Min. 57,48FPS.
Bottom line :
4960X OC + GTX 1080 OC* is OP in Crysis, pls use 4k 😁
Damn... this benchmark doesn't support 4k 🙁
*Adjusted fan curve = OC (because Boost 3.0).
Reply 225 of 241, by Fusion
- Rank
- Member
i7 2600 @ 3.4, 16GB DDR3 1333, ASUS Strix GeForce GTX 970 4GB (+150 core / +450 memory):
67.8FPS. Decent I suppose, retail run much, much faster!
Pentium III @ 1.28Ghz - Intel SE440xBX-2 - 384MB PC100 - ATi Radeon DDR 64MB @ 207/207 - SB Live! 5.1 - Windows ME
Reply 226 of 241, by MrEWhite
- Rank
- Oldbie
Can Crysis run on an 8086(k)?!?!
You bet it can.
Reply 227 of 241, by CarlHopkinsUK
Reply 228 of 241, by MMX
It seems some tests here was made against the rules.. And i only see third test in the pictures?
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 115.78s, Average FPS: 17.27
Min FPS: 0.92 at frame 201, Max FPS: 28.90 at frame 874
Average Tri/Sec: 16861796, Tri/Frame: 976089
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.94
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 89.17s, Average FPS: 22.43
Min FPS: 0.92 at frame 201, Max FPS: 31.37 at frame 995
Average Tri/Sec: 22224886, Tri/Frame: 990850
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.93
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 87.46s, Average FPS: 22.87
Min FPS: 0.92 at frame 201, Max FPS: 31.37 at frame 995
Average Tri/Sec: 22670156, Tri/Frame: 991367
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.92
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
Reply 229 of 241, by matze79
- Rank
- l33t
HP z600, Dual Quadcore Xeon, 32Gb DDR3, 512Gbyte SSD, 64Gbyte SSD, GeForce 650Ti 2Gb
Can`t run HD Resolution, only 1280x1024 Screen 😉
https://www.retrokits.de - blog, retro projects, hdd clicker, diy soundcards etc
https://www.retroianer.de - german retro computer board
Reply 230 of 241, by Munx
- Rank
- Oldbie
A benchmark for an upcoming build log 😀
My builds!
The FireStarter 2.0 - The wooden K5
The Underdog - The budget K6
The Voodoo powerhouse - The power-hungry K7
The troll PC - The Socket 423 Pentium 4
Reply 231 of 241, by candle_86
- Rank
- l33t
Here is my run on my Ryzen
Reply 232 of 241, by buckeye
- Rank
- Oldbie
Have not checked but is there a benchmark app for Crysis 2 or 3?
Asus P5N-E Intel Core 2 Duo 3.33ghz. 4GB DDR2 Geforce 470 1GB SB X-Fi Titanium 650W XP SP3
Intel SE440BX P3 450 256MB 80GB SSD Asus V7700 GF2 64mb SB 32pnp 350W 98SE
MSI x570 Gaming Pro Carbon Ryzen 3700x 32GB DDR4 Zotac RTX 3070 8GB WD Black 1TB 850W
Reply 233 of 241, by gerry
interesting thread! long too, is there a 32 bit set up that runs crysis adequately, say 1440*900, medium details, 30+fps on average
(I know i ought to just read them all or do my own tests, just wondering if anyone has direct experience of the 'perfectly adequate' 32 bit system for running crysis! 😀 )
Reply 234 of 241, by BitWrangler
- Rank
- l33t++
Awwww dang, doesn't seem to support PhysX, I had visions of a 2.8Ghz + TbredB boggling minds by sticking a 8400GT PCI in for PhysX support in addition to the prime pixel banger. (Tested that card against a 3Ghz X2 running physX in software and it was 3 or 4 times faster still, even though it's a weak card)
Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.
Reply 235 of 241, by DosFreak
- Rank
- l33t++
I want to say my Radeon HD 4670 (AGP) on my Athlon XP 2800+ played Crysis well enough somewhere around 30fps at 1024-1280x can't remember if med or high details. Hard to remember that far back.
Should probably cleanup this thread and add to first post.
Reply 236 of 241, by candle_86
- Rank
- l33t
I've got the scores for my A64 3700 and 7950GT SLI run, need to upload
Reply 237 of 241, by gerry
just quick follow up, i can play crysis on athlon x2 250 with hd6450 1gb card, that's fairly budget set up circa 2009-11 but the cpu is pretty fast. its at 1600x900 with most details set high, and a couple at medium (like water) and it's very playable. it's the 32 bit version so the Athlon XP2800+ with The HD 4670 example sounds good to me as it's fairly close to top end for 32 bit era, though i don't have a 32bit machine to match that
Reply 238 of 241, by Old_Jelly
- Rank
- Newbie
Here we go
Reply 239 of 241, by alarchy
- Rank
- Newbie
Hope the necro is okay. Recently refurbished my 2500k system with a used 980 Ti, and dual boot XP/10 on it.