Everything looks fixed. As for why this ram's at 2666 instead of 3200, thank Intel for not allowing H370 to run anything higher than 2666.
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-14, 14:46:Everything looks fixed. As for why this ram's at 2666 instead of 3200, thank Intel for not allowing H370 to run anything higher than 2666.
Thank you for checking things out and the RAM being limited to 2666 by the H370 makes no sense at all as the memory controller is within the CPU not the H370 PCH.
What does Menu->Help->Lock Handle report when you start the EVGA E-LEET Utility please?
I tested SIV on my Asus L8400L Notebook.
As far as I could see everything except the ram speed and cpu multiplier seems to match.
184mhz seems a tad optimistic for 133mhz SDram 😉
Attached screenshot and .txt file!
Nvm1 wrote on 2020-08-16, 18:32:As far as I could see everything except the ram speed and cpu multiplier seems to match. 184mhz seems a tad optimistic for 133mhz SDram
Thank you for checking out SIV and posting the results. The wonky DRAM speed is down to the FSB:DRAM 3:4 which should be FSB:DRAM 1:1.
I made some adjustments to the attached SIV32L V5.52 Tula-00 test SIV, how does it do please? I should have also improved the GPU reporting. May I have a new save file?
Hello Red,
I will test it (hopefully) this evening and post the results!
And attached the new test results!
The RAM speed and FSB:RAM seem to be correct.
The multiplier of the cpu is still a tad off (8.25 instead of 8.5) but the rest seems to be correct now!
If you have any more questions, let me know Red.
Nvm1 wrote on 2020-08-17, 19:51:The multiplier of the cpu is still a tad off (8.25 instead of 8.5) but the rest seems to be correct now!
Thank you, I suspect this is as good as it's going to get on Windows 9x. To get multiplier 100% correct SIV would need to read MSR 0x2A, but as Windows 9x does not have kernel mode SEHs (Structured Exception Handlers) I decided not to use MSRs on W9x. I expect it you ran NT4/W2K/WXP on the system SIV would do better.
I have now released SIV 5.52 Beta-00 which you should use rather than the test SIV.
Thanks Red, I will use the new version for my next laptop I am fixing 😉
I'm going to hopefully be testing SIV on an EVGA Z370 FTW and a Biostar B350GT5 in about a few days to a week.
Tested SIV on the Biostar B350GT5, the 12v voltage rail is wrong. Bios reports 12v.
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-21, 18:03:Tested SIV on the Biostar B350GT5, the 12v voltage rail is wrong. Bios reports 12v.
Thank you and so are the -70.0°C temperatures. It would be helpful to have a screen shot of what the BIOS reports, especially for the fan names.
I have adjusted the SIO mapping in the attached SIV64X 5.52 B360-03 test SIV, how do things now look please?
I had to guess the fan names, can you plug a fan into each fan header in turn and tell me if/how I need to adjust the names?
red-ray wrote on 2020-08-21, 19:22:Thank you and so are the -70.0°C temperatures. It would be helpful to have a screen shot of what the BIOS reports, especially fo […]
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-21, 18:03:Tested SIV on the Biostar B350GT5, the 12v voltage rail is wrong. Bios reports 12v.
Thank you and so are the -70.0°C temperatures. It would be helpful to have a screen shot of what the BIOS reports, especially for the fan names.
I have adjusted the SIO mapping in the attached SIV64X 5.52 B360-03 test SIV, how do things now look please?
I had to guess the fan names, can you plug a fan into each fan header in turn and tell me if/how I need to adjust the names?
Here
Fan header names are correct however there is no system 3 fan header on the board.
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-21, 20:00:Fan header names are correct however there is no system 3 fan header on the board.
Thank you, for I will remove SYS Fan 3 and change the name to VIN6 CPU SoC. Both the SIV reported +5 and +12 look a bit low, but it's possible they really are lower when Windows is running if the PSU is near it's limit. I suspect HWiNFO will report the same as SIV, does it?
red-ray wrote on 2020-08-21, 20:25:mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-21, 20:00:Fan header names are correct however there is no system 3 fan header on the board.
Thank you, for I will remove SYS Fan 3 and change the name to VIN6 CPU SoC. Both the SIV reported +5 and +12 look a bit low, but it's possible they really are lower when Windows is running if the PSU is near it's limit. I suspect HWiNFO will report the same as SIV, does it?
I think it's the psu I'm using atm, it's an old Thermaltake 430w, this board's going into a build soon and that's got a brand new Powerspec 550w 80+ bronze unit. I'll check it and report back when that's done.
red-ray wrote on 2020-08-21, 20:25:mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-21, 20:00:Fan header names are correct however there is no system 3 fan header on the board.
Thank you, for I will remove SYS Fan 3 and change the name to VIN6 CPU SoC. Both the SIV reported +5 and +12 look a bit low, but it's possible they really are lower when Windows is running if the PSU is near it's limit. I suspect HWiNFO will report the same as SIV, does it?
Did the build, HWINFO shows proper 5v and 12v.
As for SIV, I reinstalled windows and that siv version is umm, I didn't save it 🙁
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-22, 06:33:Did the build, HWINFO shows proper 5v and 12v.
As for SIV, I reinstalled windows and that siv version is umm, I didn't save it 🙁
Thank you and here is the tidied version. Ideally I would like one screen shot showing both HWiNFO + SIV.
red-ray wrote on 2020-08-22, 06:54:mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-22, 06:33:Did the build, HWINFO shows proper 5v and 12v.
As for SIV, I reinstalled windows and that siv version is umm, I didn't save it 🙁
Thank you and here is the tidied version. Ideally I would like one screen shot showing both HWiNFO + SIV.
Here
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-22, 07:12:Here
Thank you, all looks good to me so the low +5 and +12 voltages must have been down to the old PSU.
Ran SIV on the Z370 FTW, same thing as the Z370 Micro before you fixed it.
mastergamma12 wrote on 2020-08-23, 21:34:Ran SIV on the Z370 FTW, same thing as the Z370 Micro before you fixed it.
Thank you for the report and posting the files, how does the attached SIV64X 8472-03 test SIV do?
Looking at the sample counts then the SIO ones are lower than all the others, further in the save file it's reporting [Y]INUSE Wait 812 of 812 ms which usually indicates issues caused by other software.
