Reply 60 of 66, by Jo22
- Rank
- l33t++
I'm speaking under correction here, but I think it's simply that we had no urgent need for the Internet in Europe of the 90s.
All the commercial and communicative things could be done via Videotex family of online services.
And things like fiber glass and Euro ISDN could provide video telephony and instant fax/phone calls just fine (once available).
The Internet was superfluous, so to say. Not really needed, except by universities (which had access to it before the 90s).
In addition, there were third-party online services such as CompuServe, Genie, Prodigy and AOL etc.
Most of them took the role of an ISP in second half of the 90s, too.
But in 1995, when Windows 95 RTM was out, it did neither feature DirectX nor Internet software.
Microsoft rather tried to convince users to join Microsoft Network, as a rival to the internet.
That being said, the internet wasn't entirely unknown either. It just wasn't mainstream.
Internet and the world wide web were rather useful to send international e-mails and to visit personal homepages and university sites.
Commercial stuff, such as home banking, travel booking, sending messages to another user and so on could be done via Minitel style services.
CompuServe was especially popular among IT people and e-mail users, probably due to its age.
If I had to think about it, then I would say than 1996 was the moment when the masses slowly became aware of the www.
That's when books, magazines and TV shows startet to mention http://www sites.
By contrast, the cell phone (w/ digital cells) was known since 1992 or so. It was previously being known as "car phone".
They were so popular, but out of reach that many of the "cool" CB radio operators of the 1970s and 1980s had fake car phones that were CB radios, really.
Here's a list of Videotex services in Europe. It's incomplete, though.
BTX system was available in Austria and Swiss, too. And it was independent from German BTX.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videotex
In Japan, there was a similar system, that didn't use CEPT glyphs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_(videotex)
Speaking of BTX, the Wikipedia article of BTX isn't completely right, it gives an false impression, I think.
BTX was never mainstream, true, but it was no failure by any means, either.
Professionals used it regularly, just not citizens. Travel agencies loved it, for example.
The online banking feature was in use way past 2001. It still worked in late 2000s.
Also, it's false that BTX was only accessible with expensive special hardware.
"Software Decoder" were available, too. Acoustic couplers, DBT-03 or Hayes modems could be used.
In public spaces, BTX terminals with free access were sometimes to be found.
At home, users could test BTX by using guest access (Gastzugang).
It needed no registration and allowed visiting pages that were free of charge.
It merely did cost the normal telephone bills, like a phone call.
What was a bit too pricey was the fee for the regular use of the online service itself.
Users paid per page, which did cost as much as defined by the page provider.
Austria did it better here, overall. In the 80s, they had the MUPID home computers that could run Z80 code (games etc) from BTX etc.
All in all, I often think that Teletext/Videotext was the reason why ordinary citizens had no urgent need for BTX.
News and weather information could be received for free via TV, after all. A back channel wasn't needed by most people, thus.
The exception were home banking and shopping (quelle and otto come to mind), maybe.
And checking for the train delays, share prices, telephone numbers etc.
Another drawback was its slowness and prettiness.
BTX was way more colourful and sophisticated than Minitel and the 1200/75 Baud standard speed was barely adequate.
ISDN with 64 KBit/s was quick enough by far, but not available to most users for a long time.
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//