Because Basic Driver is better than nothing 😁
DVI monitor is limited to 1024x768 resolution max. (native = 1920x1200).
EDIT : This score is probably using software emulation on CPU.

it was using dual channel at over 750MHz, but I don't think it changed much from SC, it's bottleneck by Hyper Transport I think.

One is with Celeron 1.7 on Willamette Core and another on Pentium IV 1.7 also on Willamette core, tested on Gigabyte GA-8IDX mainboard and GF4MX440 with 128 mbit memory bus.

Asus CUBX-E (Intel BX 440), Pentium III-S 1400@1472, Gainward Geforce FX 5900XT@5950 Ultra AGP x2, (2x256) 512 MB RAM PC133 CL2,

3DMark2001 SE, score 10253

Here are the results of my current XP rig.
Specs: Asus A8V, 2.0 GHz AMD Athlon 64 3200+, (2x1GB) 2GB PC-3200 DDR SDRAM, BFG nVidia Geforce 7800GS OC 256MB AGP 8x
Score: 19958

I have a few more systems to benchmark soon.

"Madness", test 1 (CPU @ 3,23GHz, RAM "effective" 800MHz) :

Core i5-3470 @ 3391 MHz
Intel HD 2500

"Project Madness"
You can't go more crazy than this 😎

^^^
That is indeed an insane score, considering that Win98 seems to be as slow as NT6+ when it comes to 3DMark01. You should try benching that system with XP and 7 just to see where Win98 ranks in terms of 3D01 efficiency. You know, if you have the time. 😀

Another 4.8GHz suicide run, this time on XP. I had to pull the GTX 970 and use a 680, because NV doesn't support the 970 under XP. Even though they support the newer 960. 🙄

GTX 960 🤣 with G3258 @ 4.5, WinXP SP3 32 bit

Standard Def Steve wrote:

Another 4.8GHz suicide run, this time on XP. I had to pull the GTX 970 and use a 680, because NV doesn't support the 970 under XP. Even though they support the newer 960. 🙄

4930K-4800-3D01-XP.PNG

There are modded XP drivers for the 970/980/980Ti/Titan X Maxwell if you want to try ouy

Windows 98 SE :

Windows 2000 :

Windows 7 x64 SP1 :

Not exact settings on last one, I know 😒

A rather ridiculous combination of hardware, but fun seeing what it can do. This is the limit of what I could get out of this cpu as it wouldn't
boot with over 1.600v selected in bios. Years ago I did a vdroop mod to this motherboard, so setting 1.6v gives up to 1.712v actual.

Managed to squeeze a bit more out of it.

This was just test runs, will do complete runs, once I finish installation and configuration of whole build.

Intel Q6600, 2GB RAM, ATi Radeon 9500 (stock, Catalyst 7.11)

...and same build, just with softmodded 9500@9700

Shagittarius wrote:

Here's my current XP machine : C2D 7200, GTX 280 […]
Show full quote

Here's my current XP machine : C2D 7200, GTX 280

Update to the XP Machine : C2D 8600, GTX 580

Celeron D@3.7GHZ 185*20 (1.033ghz overclock) on my Asus P4P800dlx with HD3850.
Gives a P4 800fsb northwood a good run for it's money. Couldn't get more than this out of it.

ASUS X553MA laptop (2014!) - absolutely terrible! What is this comparable to?

System: Intel Desktop Board VC820
OS: Windows XP x86 SP3
CPU: Intel Pentium III-S 1400Mhz
Memory: 512MB (2 X 256MB) PC-800-40 RDRAM
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 512MB 64-Bit GDDR2

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 512MB 128-Bit GDDR2