Reply 8980 of 56696, by HighTreason
- Rank
- Oldbie
wrote:I feel those CPUs are slightly underpowered to really show the performance those cards can offer... even though I should not be one to speak, as I used my Voodoo2 on my MMX 200 and my V3 is currently on a K6-2. The V2 would probably be more at home in a Pentium 2 (or even the K6-2) and the V3 would be a better fit for a Pentium 3. Actually, the only reason I'm using a Voodoo3 in my K6-2 is because I could actually buy one nationally - and in a package with a bunch of other cards, including a Virge DX and a Matrox - whereas the only Banshee I saw for sale here sold faster than I could put it in my wishlist. At least one user here at Vogons claimed the Banshee was actually faster in a K6-2 than his Voodoo3, perhaps due to the drivers being better optimized for K6-2 processors.
You're probably right, I got the release dates mixed up. Doesn't matter too much so long as the machine is the same across the board and I really don't want two different machines. I might use a Slot 1 board with Celeron processors then as I don't plan on spending any more money on this.
That would allow me to use a spare board I have and easily use Celeron's from the original up to the Coppermine versions as well as Pentium II and III chips. Whatever I have in stock. Probably a Celeron 300 for the Voodoo 2 and a Celeron 500 for the Voodoo 3, maybe a 600 as I have a few of those. Interchange Celeron with PII/III in that description, doesn't really matter that much, I just need a consistent metric with all cards and it has to be era appropriate.
I could also just use a fast K6-2 for all of the tests I guess. Whilst I think a Pentium MMX 233 would be a likely candidate for the Voodoo 2 and the K6-2 550 would be for the V3 I could just run a middle-of-the-road K6-2 for all of them as they were common at the time and were released between 98-99.
wrote:I've never had any real problems with my 12MB Creative Voodoo 2. Then again, when I stopped being stupid and actually looked properly for the right driver (on a non-dying system to boot), I can't say I've had any issues with my Soundblaster Live! 5.1 card either.
Never seen a Creative one IRL. Don't imagine they are much different. Time will tell how well the Diamond one works.
The Live 5.1 always sounded rough to me and actually finding a working driver is a pain in the ass. Envy24 all the way for me.