VOGONS


Reply 20 of 24, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Caluser2000 wrote:

These exploits apparently require local access to the system.

Let us also not forget about the horror of Intel Management Engine backdoor, which plagues all PCH bridge based systems and some ICH based ones.

there's a substantial increase in performance going from PCIe 2.0 to 3.0. Are real world results very different?

Of course not - https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-gef … express-scaling

Not to mention that Intel desktop boards are very limited with available PCIe lanes, should you try to use anything else with a video card.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 21 of 24, by Horun

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Caluser2000 wrote on 2021-09-02, 23:45:
Here's a list of cpus affected. https://www.techarp.com/guides/complete-meltd … tre-cpu-list/6/ […]
Show full quote

Here's a list of cpus affected.
https://www.techarp.com/guides/complete-meltd … tre-cpu-list/6/

A fairly good artical with licks to the original announcement.
https://www.csoonline.com/article/3247868/spe … ts-at-risk.html

Anyone got a definitive source wrt who has had these exploits out in the wild so to speak?
From the horses mouth.
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/0 … -with-side.html

These exploits apparently require local access to the system.

Good Info ! I looked into it years ago and found that a typical home computer behind a good Firewalled router with the OS patched was at a super minimal risk if any as long as they did not file share/remote desktop of a PC inside to outside of their local network. You all know this already but as a reminder you can locally do a quick check on your OS and CPU: https://www.grc.com/inspectre.htm
Those exploits were more of a "proof of concept" than a reality of what was already out there as so more of a warning about what could happen.
My opinion: Never patch your old CPU with BIOS that has the Spectre microcode update for this if you have a choice unless you want it to perform like a 1/2 the cpu it once was. Just patch the OS ...

Hate posting a reply and then have to edit it because it made no sense 😁 First computer was an IBM 3270 workstation with CGA monitor. Stuff: https://archive.org/details/@horun

Reply 22 of 24, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Cheers Horun. We don't want Vogons members receiving duff info now do we....😉

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 23 of 24, by cde

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I tested several Z77 microATX boards last year and the Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H 1.1 came out as the best, see Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H 1.1, Intel Core i7 3770K, MSI GeForce 960

The Serpent Rider wrote on 2021-09-03, 01:10:

Let us also not forget about the horror of Intel Management Engine backdoor, which plagues all PCH bridge based systems and some ICH based ones.

I used me_cleaner on the GA-Z77M-D3H BIOS with great success, the ME is disabled during normal operation. Also Gigabyte has a tool to customize the boot image which is nice.

Reply 24 of 24, by KT7AGuy

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
The Serpent Rider wrote on 2021-09-03, 01:10:

Thank you for this. Clearly, the performance improvement going from PCIe 2.0 to 3.0 is negligible.

cde wrote on 2021-09-03, 12:47:

I tested several Z77 microATX boards last year and the Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H 1.1 came out as the best

Thank you for another excellent recommendation.