zuldan wrote on Yesterday, 21:06:
PD2JK wrote on Yesterday, 17:57:Yet another mystery box, a local listing with a very concise title: old pc. Two pictures as well. […]
Show full quote
Yet another mystery box, a local listing with a very concise title: old pc. Two pictures as well.
When you see this, a retro enthousiast knows enough:
The attachment DSC_4014.JPG is no longer available
I just had to have it, so I did. Lost a kidney again but still happy.
Crappy pic:
The attachment DSC_4013.JPG is no longer available
(PT-2006 board in the background)
Now to get some Sega controllers.
Might be a good time to go buy a lottery ticket 😉
The NV1 was an interesting Quad rendering card, the fact it used squares over triangles made it difficult to program for though. Very cool card but has very limited potential use aside from collecting, the NV2 was also rumored to use quads and due to how poorly the NV1 was received got dropped. A lot of the research and development got moved to the NV3 better known as the Riva 128 and well the rest is history as they say.
I place this card right alongside the Fury MAXX, both damn cool cards to have in the collection but neither are terrible useful as retro gaming cards. (I still don't own a NV1, they are priced out of reach of your average collector unless you get lucky)
Nvidia made the right choice to drop quads, it was a cool experiment and showed that other forms of rendering besides triangles could work, the industry however spoke and went with the easier to program for triangles. IIRC they are also easier for the GPU computationally requiring less time to process in the rendering pipeline.