VOGONS


First post, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have this IBM 300GL computer that comes with a Pentium II 350 (which I replaced with a Pentium III 550 but it's seen as a Pentium II 550), 384MB of RAM (maximum supported) but unfortunately it doesn't have an AGP slot. It has an integrated S3 Trio 3D and obviously ISA and PCI slots. According to my calculations, it should be the computer that sits between the 200MHz Pentium and the 2.8GHz Pentium 4. I'd like to use it in my computer fleet... but without an AGP slot, what can I make it do?

Reply 1 of 13, by jh80

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

It's probably going to overlap a lot with the other two.

You could put something like a PCI Voodoo 3 in there to cover that era of 3dfx games. But the P4 you have can probably do a lot of those games better, and the Voodoo 3 isn't cheap, so not sure how worth it that would be to you.

You could put an ISA sound card in there and throw late-era DOS games at it that the P1 can't quite handle. Games like Build-engine titles that need a beefy CPU at higher resolutions. There are only a few games like that, though, so again, not worth it unless you're really into those games.

Reply 2 of 13, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It's a great late DOS system; S3 Trio is exactly the kind of AGP card you'd put in a system like that anyway, so fact it's onboard doesn't matter.

Reply 3 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Can you give me some examples of games you think it's perfect for? If I only have this computer with DOS, I wouldn't have a computer with Win98 because I have: 286, 386, DX2, Pentium 60 with DOS, Pentium 200 Windows 95 and Pentium 4 Windows XP. I would miss the computer with Win98.

Reply 4 of 13, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I think I would put a PCI Riva TNT or TNT M64 in there.

https://ebay.us/m/U9lhD5

It should be good for games up to around 1999 or so.

Reply 5 of 13, by PD2JK

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Tiberian Sun / Red Alert 2
Baldur's Gate
Jazz Jackrabbit 2

These games don't require a fast 3D accelerator.

i386 16 ⇒ i486 DX4 100 ⇒ Pentium MMX 200 ⇒ Athlon Pluto 700 ⇒ AthlonXP 1700+ ⇒ Opteron 165 ⇒ Dual Opteron 856

Reply 6 of 13, by Ydee

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
RetroPCCupboard wrote on Yesterday, 09:03:

I think I would put a PCI Riva TNT or TNT M64 in there.

https://ebay.us/m/U9lhD5

It should be good for games up to around 1999 or so.

I'm afraid this one might not work - I had the same one in Compaq Deskpro EN SFF on BX440 and P2 350 and didn't load the picture. Another one works, the Inno3D TNT2 M64.

Reply 7 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
RetroPCCupboard wrote on Yesterday, 09:03:

I think I would put a PCI Riva TNT or TNT M64 in there.

https://ebay.us/m/U9lhD5

It should be good for games up to around 1999 or so.

I need to find a solution that can fill the gap between the P200 and the P4. Keep in mind that I'm not a fan of first-person shooters like Unreal; I only like historical ones like Doom. I much prefer Red Alert (which I played to the point of boredom) but a computer that can run Need for Speed ​​or Screamer 2, or even something more advanced (but still in the same genre), would be very welcome.

Reply 8 of 13, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Ydee wrote on Yesterday, 10:48:

I'm afraid this one might not work - I had the same one in Compaq Deskpro EN SFF on BX440 and P2 350 and didn't load the picture. Another one works, the Inno3D TNT2 M64.

Hmm. Interesting. I wonder why that one in particular has an issue....

Reply 9 of 13, by theelf

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

This are great machines, a integrated S3 is best option, exelent support in dos, win3.x and win9x

Latest one have integrated ESS 1938 solo1 even being pci, have great and solid dos support, give a try

Reply 10 of 13, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
theelf wrote on Yesterday, 12:42:

This are great machines, a integrated S3 is best option, exelent support in dos, win3.x and win9x

Latest one have integrated ESS 1938 solo1 even being pci, have great and solid dos support, give a try

I installed a Sound Blaster 64 ISA for use in DOS. But it works fine in Windows too. My only concern was whether the difference between the powerful CPU and the underpowered graphics card would make the computer too unbalanced.

Reply 11 of 13, by theelf

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 13:16:
theelf wrote on Yesterday, 12:42:

This are great machines, a integrated S3 is best option, exelent support in dos, win3.x and win9x

Latest one have integrated ESS 1938 solo1 even being pci, have great and solid dos support, give a try

I installed a Sound Blaster 64 ISA for use in DOS. But it works fine in Windows too. My only concern was whether the difference between the powerful CPU and the underpowered graphics card would make the computer too unbalanced.

S3 cards are best compatibility, even when i build a latest pentium 3 like 1ghz i use S3 cards

Lot of games and software of time have s3 compatibility in mind, like cirrus

And in win9x have good support for ddraw

In DOS or win9x are some of the best, if you want custom resolutions and tv out 15khz

nvidia, like geforce 4mx are great cards too, cheap and still easy to find in PCI, but without win3x drivers are not a option for me. No win3x no fun

Reply 12 of 13, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 13:16:

I installed a Sound Blaster 64 ISA for use in DOS. But it works fine in Windows too. My only concern was whether the difference between the powerful CPU and the underpowered graphics card would make the computer too unbalanced.

Really depends what you are using it for. I am putting an S3 graphics card with my Athlon 1.4Ghz CPU and ISA soundblaster. It is for an overpowered DOS rig. There are some very demanding DOS games that I am hoping to play on it at 640x480 (or higher). Duke Nukem 3D, system Shock etc.

Reply 13 of 13, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 08:52:

Can you give me some examples of games you think it's perfect for? If I only have this computer with DOS, I wouldn't have a computer with Win98 because I have: 286, 386, DX2, Pentium 60 with DOS, Pentium 200 Windows 95 and Pentium 4 Windows XP. I would miss the computer with Win98.

That Pentium 4 would be a better Windows 98 system - remember that Windows 98 was released in 1998 (as was this computer), but only reached maturity with Win98SE in late 1999, and was only really replaced in the consumer space in late 2001 by Windows XP. A P2-350 runs Win98SE itself fine, but would fail badly at running 2001 games designed for Windows 98 - or even 1999 games like Unreal Tournament. They would far prefer that P4; my main Win98SE system has a P3-1400S and GeForce4Ti, which is as fast as a P4-2000 or so and vastly faster than any P2

In fact I upgraded my late DOS system from K6-2 350 to P3-600 as it was a bit slow in Quake, Fallout, GTA and Master of Magic.

AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 13:16:

[...]
I installed a Sound Blaster 64 ISA for use in DOS. But it works fine in Windows too. My only concern was whether the difference between the powerful CPU and the underpowered graphics card would make the computer too unbalanced.

In DOS the video system is just a frame buffer and performance is determined purely by how fast it can get stuff from memory to screen. Generally they will be bottlenecked by the bus - so an S3 Trio AGP will be just as fast as an S3 Virge, Voodoo3 or indeed GeForce FX5500 or so.