AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 08:52:
Can you give me some examples of games you think it's perfect for? If I only have this computer with DOS, I wouldn't have a computer with Win98 because I have: 286, 386, DX2, Pentium 60 with DOS, Pentium 200 Windows 95 and Pentium 4 Windows XP. I would miss the computer with Win98.
That Pentium 4 would be a better Windows 98 system - remember that Windows 98 was released in 1998 (as was this computer), but only reached maturity with Win98SE in late 1999, and was only really replaced in the consumer space in late 2001 by Windows XP. A P2-350 runs Win98SE itself fine, but would fail badly at running 2001 games designed for Windows 98 - or even 1999 games like Unreal Tournament. They would far prefer that P4; my main Win98SE system has a P3-1400S and GeForce4Ti, which is as fast as a P4-2000 or so and vastly faster than any P2
In fact I upgraded my late DOS system from K6-2 350 to P3-600 as it was a bit slow in Quake, Fallout, GTA and Master of Magic.
AlessandroB wrote on Yesterday, 13:16:
[...]
I installed a Sound Blaster 64 ISA for use in DOS. But it works fine in Windows too. My only concern was whether the difference between the powerful CPU and the underpowered graphics card would make the computer too unbalanced.
In DOS the video system is just a frame buffer and performance is determined purely by how fast it can get stuff from memory to screen. Generally they will be bottlenecked by the bus - so an S3 Trio AGP will be just as fast as an S3 Virge, Voodoo3 or indeed GeForce FX5500 or so.