First post, by renejr902
Hi Guys ! I appreciated all your previous helps and answers, this time for you i will make several benchmarks in the next weeks and update the first post. But please be patient, i have a lot of pc to configure and wife and children too LoL! 😉 I have several vintage pc and videocards.
( ex: P2 266 P2 450 P3 800 P1 233mmx.. Geforce 2 mx 200, Geforce 4 mx440SE, FX 5200PCI, TnT 2 M64, voodoo3 PCI, banshee, S3 virge gx2, Ati rage 128... But i will mostly compare geforce and voodoo cards, i will test more game later, i know everyone love Quake1-2 more than me 😉 but i dont hate them , i prefer racing games and rpg.)
BENCHMARKS:
P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98, driver nvidia 30.38, NFS III Hot Pursuit: Every Graphics at highest, except view distance at medium. First race ( i use fraps 1.9)
1024x768 x 16bits - 38fps at beginning of the race , drop to 25-28fps with a lots of cars. Always between 25 and 38 and the game is playable , its still fine.
800x600 x 16bits - ALWAYS 38 fps all the race. Never drop to 37fps, never go to 39 .the game is very playable , its fine. i find the result strange.
( note: before the race start it begins a 64 fps and drop to 38 fps 2-3 seconds before the race begin.
640x480 x 16bits - 55 to 64fps at beginning of the race , in general it drops between 40 to 48 with a lots of cars. But can stay at 38fps for a long time with several cars around. never drop below 38. Mostly between 50 and 58 when no cars around. and the game is very playable , its very good..
Note: i prefer 800x600 because it always at 38fps.
( Maybe , Next time, next benchmark, same PC same game with Geforce mx 440SE, i didnt receive my voodoo3 and banshee yet. (shipping tracking number) i will receive my voodoo3 pci next friday.
____________________________
P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98
NFS Hot Pursuit II: default graphics (its like medium settings with cars details to minimum) First race ( i use fraps 1.9)
640x480 16bits:
during first lap with a few cars 9 to 14 fps
a lot of cars around 4 to 9
No cars at all : 20 to 27 fps
so the game is playable in time trial LoL!
for real the game is not playable.
( i have the minimum system requirement LoL!)
640x480 16bits: MINIMUM GRAPHICS:
Exactly the same fps in each situation , its run like default graphics. ( maybe 5% more fps) its sad! its unplayable.
____________________________
P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98
NFS Porsche Unleashed : medium graphics. First race: Normandie. ( i use fraps 1.9)
640x480 16bits:
during first lap with a few cars 15 to 20 fps
a lot of cars around 9 to 14
No cars at all : 20 to 28 fps ( same thing than HotPursuit2)
Its not playable , when cars are around its really unplayable . )
( i have a lot more than recommended setting)
EDIT: I got it working nice at 640x480 medium graphics, between 25 to 43 fps lowest 20 , with NO DISPLAY HUD OPTION. When i pushed F5 all hud option disappear. I made several tests and i lose 14 fps with HUD options enable.
in 1024x768 32 bits in highest graphics setting, game run between 14 to 20 fps. Even with no Hud option display, its 100% the same fps, it changes nothing at all. does it means the videocard is not strong enough for highest setting in high resolution? i think yes..
i just saw that at 20 fps with all hud, no car around, it goes to 25 if i disable all hud option. sometime 18fps with hud to 23fps with no hud. but at 14 fps with cars around, hud change nothing.
_______________________
P2 450mhz 128mb, 800x600 x16bit - Geforce 4 mx 440SE (64bit), Win 98.
Need for Speed III Hot Pursuit, Maximum graphics except medium view distance. no back mirror.
800x600
Alone , no cars around or a few cars very far=
50 to 60fps
A lot of cars around me 42-43fps
a few cards around me 40-50fps
1024x768 NO difference at all with 800x600. ( maybe 1-2 fps less)
640x480 NO difference at all vs 1024x768 or 80ox600. (maybe 2-3 more fps.) ( It seems its CPU Bottleneck, right? )
* Im very surprised of these result with NFS III and mx440SE * The game run exactly the same with any resolution.
Edit:NFS III and mx440SE have correct fps results, i just tested it again. no difference at all in fps , not even 1fps, in maximum graphics between 640x480 and 1024x768, 100% same fps during 1 full lap in each resolution, same fps drop at same place
_____________________________
P2 450mhz 128mb, 800x600 x16bit - Geforce 4 mx 440SE (64bit), Win 98.
NFS Porsche Unleashed in
Maximum graphics except high view distance instead of very high. no HUD display option.
648x480x16bits
lot of cars in forest :14-18
a few cars no forest: 20-28
no cars no forest: 25-40 ( most of time 37-38)
1024x768
lot of cars in forest :13-18
a few cars no forest: 18-25
no cars no forest: 25-40 ( most of time 37-38)
Wow! The game run exactly the same at any resolution (maybe 5% fps difference) like NFS III
Edit: i tested again 440mx SE with Porsche, same result, all results are correct, but i edited them a little, more details.
Edit:NFS III and mx440SE have correct fps results, i just tested it again.
_______________
P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
NFS III HP with Geforce FX 5200 PCI 64bit DDR
1024x768
Lot of cars : 24fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 32fps
640x480
Lot of cars: 23fps
Alone: 39fps
Some cars around 33fps
( The fps result are exactly the same at any resolution.)
It seems to have a overhead driver problem , FX5200 run worst than mx440SE and runs very very similar to Geforce 2 mx 200, a little better, but not by much, maybe 2 to 5fps more in general.
By the way, the Picture Quality of the FX 5200 IS A LOT BETTER than Gegorce 2 mx 200 and Geforce 4 mx440SE.
For a retro system for DOS and Windows 98, i recommend strongly the FX 5200 if the picture quality is very important to you. Better clarity, btightness, contrast, colors. Same results in dos and win98. Its a Wow! effect vs the 2 others cars. FX 5200 in Picture Quality for dos beats easily too the Matrox Mystique and Trident 1MB, i will compare with voodoo cards ehen i received them.
_______________________
P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
NFS: Porsche with FX 5200
I did both test 1024x768x32bit or 1024x768x16bits ( same fps result at 100%.)
A lot of cars 11-17
A few cars around 17-22
Alone, no cars 28-38
It runs A LOT worst than MX440SE and very similar to geforce 2 mx 200.
But Even in 16bits colors quality, the FX 5200 beats or look similar to the colors quality of the 2 others cards in 32bits colors. In 16 bits colors MX440SE and Gf2mx200 look washout , colors are fade quality. But the FX 5200 in 16bits colors looks very colorful and nice but not as realism as 32bits colors. But the difference is not very big between 16bits and 32bits colors for FX5200, i cant say the same for the 2 others cards 😉
_________________
NFS Hot Pursuit ii with FX5200 PCI on the P2 450mhz, 128mb,win98.
Lowest graphics possible in 640x480x16bits
No cars: 35 fps
A lot of cars: 20-25 fps
a few drop at 15fps, maybe hard disk too slow.
Game playable !!! Im surprised this game was not playable at all with the geforce 2 mx 200. Its strange then that i cant have more fps with fx5200 than geforce 2 mx200 with Need III and Porsche.
( i didnt try mx440se with hot pursuit II)
I JUST TRIED in 1024x768 Low-medium graphics , its playable, same fps in same situation, maybe 1 to 3 fps less. I tried too with medium-high graphics with 32bits colors and its like 10-16fps not playable. The fx5200 beats completely gf2mx200 with a p2 450 on this game
_____________________
mx440SE P2 450mhz
NFS Hot Pursuit II
1024x768 lowest graphics
a few cars 17fps
no cars 20-22 fps
Lot of cars between 7 to 12 fps.
It runs like crap, unplayable. It runs exactly like gf2 mx200. This game only playable with FX 5200.
But the MX440SE is a lot more powerful than FX5200 in Need III and Porsche, MUCH more fps. im really confuse about that.
Can someone explain that ?
______________________
P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
1024x768 full graphic, except view distance medium
NFS III HP with Geforce 256 DDR 32MB
1024x768
Lot of cars : 38fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 38fps
Always 37-38fps. Very stable.
( i tested Porsche unleashed with same configuration its runs exactly, same fps, like the geforce4 mx440SE )
________________________
P3 933mhz, 256mb, win98
1024x768 full graphic, except view distance medium
NFS III HP with Geforce FX 5200 PCI DDR 64bit
1024x768
Lot of cars : 38fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 38fps
Its not normal ???
************
Edit: Yes refresh rate was set at 75hz and the game cant run at 75hz with vsync on. Anyway even at 60hz , the fx 5200 cant get 60 fps with vsync on with these graphics settings. it seems a overhead driver problem. Geforce 3 Ti200 runs this game with same settings always at 60 fps with vsync on.
************
______________________
************
I made SEVERAL new benchmarks. For the moment, please go see the results in the next posts, i wont put the first post to date for some days. Thanks
************