VOGONS


First post, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Hi Guys ! I appreciated all your previous helps and answers, this time for you i will make several benchmarks in the next weeks and update the first post. But please be patient, i have a lot of pc to configure and wife and children too LoL! 😉 I have several vintage pc and videocards.
( ex: P2 266 P2 450 P3 800 P1 233mmx.. Geforce 2 mx 200, Geforce 4 mx440SE, FX 5200PCI, TnT 2 M64, voodoo3 PCI, banshee, S3 virge gx2, Ati rage 128... But i will mostly compare geforce and voodoo cards, i will test more game later, i know everyone love Quake1-2 more than me 😉 but i dont hate them , i prefer racing games and rpg.)

BENCHMARKS:

P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98, driver nvidia 30.38, NFS III Hot Pursuit: Every Graphics at highest, except view distance at medium. First race ( i use fraps 1.9)

1024x768 x 16bits - 38fps at beginning of the race , drop to 25-28fps with a lots of cars. Always between 25 and 38 and the game is playable , its still fine.

800x600 x 16bits - ALWAYS 38 fps all the race. Never drop to 37fps, never go to 39 .the game is very playable , its fine. i find the result strange.
( note: before the race start it begins a 64 fps and drop to 38 fps 2-3 seconds before the race begin.

640x480 x 16bits - 55 to 64fps at beginning of the race , in general it drops between 40 to 48 with a lots of cars. But can stay at 38fps for a long time with several cars around. never drop below 38. Mostly between 50 and 58 when no cars around. and the game is very playable , its very good..

Note: i prefer 800x600 because it always at 38fps.
( Maybe , Next time, next benchmark, same PC same game with Geforce mx 440SE, i didnt receive my voodoo3 and banshee yet. (shipping tracking number) i will receive my voodoo3 pci next friday.

____________________________

P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98
NFS Hot Pursuit II: default graphics (its like medium settings with cars details to minimum) First race ( i use fraps 1.9)

640x480 16bits:
during first lap with a few cars 9 to 14 fps
a lot of cars around 4 to 9
No cars at all : 20 to 27 fps

so the game is playable in time trial LoL!
for real the game is not playable.

( i have the minimum system requirement LoL!)

640x480 16bits: MINIMUM GRAPHICS:
Exactly the same fps in each situation , its run like default graphics. ( maybe 5% more fps) its sad! its unplayable.
____________________________

P2 450mhz - 128mb - geforce 2 mx 200 Win98
NFS Porsche Unleashed : medium graphics. First race: Normandie. ( i use fraps 1.9)

640x480 16bits:
during first lap with a few cars 15 to 20 fps
a lot of cars around 9 to 14
No cars at all : 20 to 28 fps ( same thing than HotPursuit2)

Its not playable , when cars are around its really unplayable . )

( i have a lot more than recommended setting)

EDIT: I got it working nice at 640x480 medium graphics, between 25 to 43 fps lowest 20 , with NO DISPLAY HUD OPTION. When i pushed F5 all hud option disappear. I made several tests and i lose 14 fps with HUD options enable.

in 1024x768 32 bits in highest graphics setting, game run between 14 to 20 fps. Even with no Hud option display, its 100% the same fps, it changes nothing at all. does it means the videocard is not strong enough for highest setting in high resolution? i think yes..

i just saw that at 20 fps with all hud, no car around, it goes to 25 if i disable all hud option. sometime 18fps with hud to 23fps with no hud. but at 14 fps with cars around, hud change nothing.

_______________________

P2 450mhz 128mb, 800x600 x16bit - Geforce 4 mx 440SE (64bit), Win 98.
Need for Speed III Hot Pursuit, Maximum graphics except medium view distance. no back mirror.

800x600
Alone , no cars around or a few cars very far=
50 to 60fps
A lot of cars around me 42-43fps
a few cards around me 40-50fps

1024x768 NO difference at all with 800x600. ( maybe 1-2 fps less)

640x480 NO difference at all vs 1024x768 or 80ox600. (maybe 2-3 more fps.) ( It seems its CPU Bottleneck, right? )

* Im very surprised of these result with NFS III and mx440SE * The game run exactly the same with any resolution.

Edit:NFS III and mx440SE have correct fps results, i just tested it again. no difference at all in fps , not even 1fps, in maximum graphics between 640x480 and 1024x768, 100% same fps during 1 full lap in each resolution, same fps drop at same place
_____________________________

P2 450mhz 128mb, 800x600 x16bit - Geforce 4 mx 440SE (64bit), Win 98.

NFS Porsche Unleashed in
Maximum graphics except high view distance instead of very high. no HUD display option.

648x480x16bits

lot of cars in forest :14-18
a few cars no forest: 20-28
no cars no forest: 25-40 ( most of time 37-38)

1024x768
lot of cars in forest :13-18
a few cars no forest: 18-25
no cars no forest: 25-40 ( most of time 37-38)

Wow! The game run exactly the same at any resolution (maybe 5% fps difference) like NFS III

Edit: i tested again 440mx SE with Porsche, same result, all results are correct, but i edited them a little, more details.

Edit:NFS III and mx440SE have correct fps results, i just tested it again.
_______________

P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
NFS III HP with Geforce FX 5200 PCI 64bit DDR

1024x768
Lot of cars : 24fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 32fps

640x480
Lot of cars: 23fps
Alone: 39fps
Some cars around 33fps

( The fps result are exactly the same at any resolution.)

It seems to have a overhead driver problem , FX5200 run worst than mx440SE and runs very very similar to Geforce 2 mx 200, a little better, but not by much, maybe 2 to 5fps more in general.
By the way, the Picture Quality of the FX 5200 IS A LOT BETTER than Gegorce 2 mx 200 and Geforce 4 mx440SE.

For a retro system for DOS and Windows 98, i recommend strongly the FX 5200 if the picture quality is very important to you. Better clarity, btightness, contrast, colors. Same results in dos and win98. Its a Wow! effect vs the 2 others cars. FX 5200 in Picture Quality for dos beats easily too the Matrox Mystique and Trident 1MB, i will compare with voodoo cards ehen i received them.

_______________________

P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
NFS: Porsche with FX 5200

I did both test 1024x768x32bit or 1024x768x16bits ( same fps result at 100%.)

A lot of cars 11-17
A few cars around 17-22
Alone, no cars 28-38

It runs A LOT worst than MX440SE and very similar to geforce 2 mx 200.

But Even in 16bits colors quality, the FX 5200 beats or look similar to the colors quality of the 2 others cards in 32bits colors. In 16 bits colors MX440SE and Gf2mx200 look washout , colors are fade quality. But the FX 5200 in 16bits colors looks very colorful and nice but not as realism as 32bits colors. But the difference is not very big between 16bits and 32bits colors for FX5200, i cant say the same for the 2 others cards 😉

_________________

NFS Hot Pursuit ii with FX5200 PCI on the P2 450mhz, 128mb,win98.
Lowest graphics possible in 640x480x16bits

No cars: 35 fps
A lot of cars: 20-25 fps
a few drop at 15fps, maybe hard disk too slow.

Game playable !!! Im surprised this game was not playable at all with the geforce 2 mx 200. Its strange then that i cant have more fps with fx5200 than geforce 2 mx200 with Need III and Porsche.
( i didnt try mx440se with hot pursuit II)

I JUST TRIED in 1024x768 Low-medium graphics , its playable, same fps in same situation, maybe 1 to 3 fps less. I tried too with medium-high graphics with 32bits colors and its like 10-16fps not playable. The fx5200 beats completely gf2mx200 with a p2 450 on this game

_____________________

mx440SE P2 450mhz
NFS Hot Pursuit II
1024x768 lowest graphics
a few cars 17fps
no cars 20-22 fps
Lot of cars between 7 to 12 fps.

It runs like crap, unplayable. It runs exactly like gf2 mx200. This game only playable with FX 5200.
But the MX440SE is a lot more powerful than FX5200 in Need III and Porsche, MUCH more fps. im really confuse about that.

Can someone explain that ?

______________________

P2 450mhz, 128mb, win98
1024x768 full graphic, except view distance medium
NFS III HP with Geforce 256 DDR 32MB

1024x768
Lot of cars : 38fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 38fps
Always 37-38fps. Very stable.
( i tested Porsche unleashed with same configuration its runs exactly, same fps, like the geforce4 mx440SE )
________________________

P3 933mhz, 256mb, win98
1024x768 full graphic, except view distance medium
NFS III HP with Geforce FX 5200 PCI DDR 64bit

1024x768
Lot of cars : 38fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 38fps

Its not normal ???

************

Edit: Yes refresh rate was set at 75hz and the game cant run at 75hz with vsync on. Anyway even at 60hz , the fx 5200 cant get 60 fps with vsync on with these graphics settings. it seems a overhead driver problem. Geforce 3 Ti200 runs this game with same settings always at 60 fps with vsync on.

************

______________________

************

I made SEVERAL new benchmarks. For the moment, please go see the results in the next posts, i wont put the first post to date for some days. Thanks

************

Last edited by renejr902 on 2020-08-27, 18:12. Edited 64 times in total.

Reply 1 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Man! strange results.

Did i have a problem with my configuration ?

What is the bottleneck in each NFS game and differents resolution? The CPU or geforce 2 mx 200 videocard ?

thanks for answers guys.

( Note: i take it in consideration when framerate drop , i didnt talk about it , but high fps drop when reading on this super slow original 5.25" hard disk , its a 4000 rpm , its runs like 1000 rpm 🤣!, and it does A LOT OF NOISE when it read things !! I cant live with that noise. i will put a better one soon, but it seems to work very well )
( Note: i just got NFS Porsche working good, 14 more fps with no HUD in display, read Edit in first post.)

Reply 2 of 97, by SPBHM

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I think Porsche benefits from a faster CPU than a P2 at the race starts, but the MX200 is also struggling I would think, with 64bit SDR,
if you want a hard track for the GPU I think Schwarzwald was the one giving me the most trouble with a Voodoo 4 4500
but overall the v4 4500 was mostly fine for playing at 800x600-1024-768 nearly on max details offered using glide (so 16bit colors and so on which helps)

in NFS3 if I remember correctly rain really dropped the framerate,

Reply 3 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

i just added Geforce 4 mx440SE (64bit version) results. Much more FPS than using a geforce 2 mx 200, maybe no driver overhead.

BUT Im very surprised i saw no difference at all between any resolution in Need for speed III Hot Pursuit and NFS Porsche unleashed. ( maybe 5% fps difference between 640x480 and 1024x768)

I have a few questions about that result i just had with NFS III and NFS Porsche and 440mxSE, i want to understand better. thanks for answers:

1. Is it because of a cpu bottleneck that i get same fps in any resolution in that game ?

2. and if i try for example a better Geforce card like G4 ti4200 or FX5600 or maybe gf6 6800gt ( i dont have them) would the fps be higher in 1024x768 in maximum graphics setting ? would i have perfect 60fps?

3. If answer is NO at number question 2. i suppose even the cpu have to be stronger in high resolution like 1024x768 ? or the P2 450mhz is enough for this game?

4. Does the GPU have a DRIVER OVERHEAD problem even with P2 450mhz ?

After these 4 answers i should really get it in my head 😉 LoL!

Thanks guys ! 😀 Im very surprised of this result.

Edit: i tested again 440mx SE with Porsche, same result, all results are correct, but i edited them a little, more details.

Edit2:NFS III and mx440SE have correct fps results, i just tested it again, no difference at all in fps , not even 1fps, in maximum graphics between 640x480 and 1024x768, 100% same fps during 1 full lap in each resolution, same fps drop at same place

EDIT3: i just add a new result benchmark of Geforce FX 5200 PCI 64bit DDR , its very similar to geforce 2 mx200 fps result and worst than mx440SE(64bit). its seem to have a overhead driver problem. But im impress A LOT by FX 5200 Picture Quality vs All others cards, i talk about that in the benchmark section. NEXT TESTS will be done with same cards with a Pentium III 733mhz or 800mhz or 933mhz.
I just got by chance for free a Pentium III 933mhz with a geforce 1 (256) DDR in it. 😀

Edit4: new benchmarks again are just arrived 😀

Edit5: new benchmarks again are just arrived 😀

Last edited by renejr902 on 2020-08-23, 11:18. Edited 3 times in total.

Reply 4 of 97, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Does the GPU have a DRIVER OVERHEAD problem even with P2 450mhz ?

Of course it does. It might be not as horrible as on S7 system, because you can at least get acceptable frame rate, even with late drivers, but it's still an issue to consider.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 5 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Ok i need help. Its not normal.

I got this with a P3 at 933 mhz:

P3 933mhz, 256mb, win98
1024x768 full graphic, except view distance medium
NFS III HP with Geforce FX 5200 PCI DDR 64bit

1024x768
Lot of cars : 38fps
Alone 38fps
Some cars around : 38fps

Its not normal ???

How i can have only 38 fps ???

Its the same 38 fps with a P2 450mhz and same videocard or with a worst video card ? Thanks for answer and help.

- I use fraps 1.9
- The P3 is not the same computer than the P2
- Maybe its a Fraps problem, maybe it runs at 60fps, i think it looks like that. It runs smoothly, no tearing or vsync problem, no slow down, no fps high spike, it always 38
-OR maybe the game runs at a maximum of 38 fps.
- At lowest graphics in 1024x768 its still 38fps.
- with Full view distance its still 38fps.
- i just tested again and feel it runs maybe at 38fps for real , when i turn a corner it doesnt look 60fps.
- Its strange in 640x480, it runs at 38fps too but sometime it switch to 54fps for 2 seconds and fall back at 38fps. Maybe i have to change with vsync option but nvdia 45.23 driver dont have vsync setting. i need help thanks

Reply 6 of 97, by SPBHM

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

could this be vsync? like double buffered vsync at 75Hz not hitting full FPS so going to half framerate?

because the game doesn't have a lock at 38FPS, I've played it at 60 and more, also p3 933 should improve the game quite a bit from a P2 from my experience with P2 400 vs p3 750 with the v4 4500.

Reply 7 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
SPBHM wrote on 2020-08-24, 06:36:

could this be vsync? like double buffered vsync at 75Hz not hitting full FPS so going to half framerate?

because the game doesn't have a lock at 38FPS, I've played it at 60 and more, also p3 933 should improve the game quite a bit from a P2 from my experience with P2 400 vs p3 750 with the v4 4500.

probably !! i use optimal in refresh rate adapter tab. i will change it to 60hz and try again. But at 60hz display quality is not very crisp on my samsung 32" lcd tv in vga. i try it now and tell you the result. thanks

Edit: Its worst ! I got 30 fps at 60hz. I cant believe my system is not good enough for 60 fps. Any ideas ? thanks ( maybe i could try vsync off with a program like riva turner or powerstrip, but i really want 60hz with vsync on.)
- I just finished 1st lap, it always at 30fps, never goes to 60fps , not even one time.
- Ok i finished lap 2 in last place far behind, and a few times it switch to 60fps for 4-5 seconds and switch back to 30 fps, it did it 3 times in lap 2.
- i stayed in 1024x768 and i changed all graphics to lowest possible and i got 60fps stable. It seems
" Horizon Setting " at disable vs high can switch the game between 60fps to 30fps by himself.)
Im will be really disappointed if a P3 933 mhz and a FX 5200 cant run NFS III in high graphics at 1024x768 at 60 fps stable enough. IS IT Normal ?
( i will try my voodoo 3 with it when i received it friday) - i just tested more. the best it can do to get 1024x768 at 60 fps and only with no cars around 🙁 its highest graphical setting with Horizon Disable and View Distance Close. im not satisfied. I hope voodoo 3 will do 1024x768 60 fps with near full graphics, otherwise i will buy a FX 5600 or a better FX card or a 6800 GT. i think both cards are ok for win98 and good for dos too. ( im not sure a Geforce 2 GTS or Geforce 3 ti200 or Geforce 4 ti4200 wont be enough to play in 1024x768 in most win98 games? right?) I really hope my current results are not normal and someone here will be able to help me to correct the problem, if its not normal to have less than 60fps in that game with my P3 933mhz and a fx 5200. thanks guys!

Reply 8 of 97, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
renejr902 wrote on 2020-08-24, 06:13:

- Its strange in 640x480, it runs at 38fps too but sometime it switch to 54fps for 2 seconds and fall back at 38fps. Maybe i have to change with vsync option but nvdia 45.23 driver dont have vsync setting. i need help thanks

Download the Coolbits registry tweak from Phil's website. It will unlock several new settings in the drivers, including V-sync control.

To disable V-sync, go to the Nvidia driver panel > Direct3D Settings > More Direct3D > Vertical sync mode > Always off. Do this for OpenGL as well.

im not sure a Geforce 2 GTS or Geforce 3 ti200 or Geforce 4 ti4200 wont be enough to play in 1024x768 in most win98 games?

A GeForce4 ti4200 coupled with a 1 GHz CPU should be fast enough to deliver 60+ FPS at 1280x1024 (and below) in the vast majority of Win9x games. See my AthlonXP build for example.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium

Reply 9 of 97, by devius

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I think the problem now is the PCI version of the GeForce FX5200. Have you tried with the equivalent AGP version?

Reply 10 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I just saw your messages guys. i have to sleep soon. I already patch Need III with the high resolution patch but thanks to Bloodem. Tomorrow i will install Phil vsync tweak. But i just made several tests, im doing differents benchmark for fun but i still want a P3 system that i like. I will try tomorrow some of your suggestions.

BUT the 38fps was because adapter was set at optimal refresh rate (75hz). Now i got 30 fps with FX 5200. So i remove the PCI fx 5200 64 bit because i know now its a bad card for my system, maybe PCI one is not good. i dont have the agp version.

And i try the gf4 mx440SE with the P3 933mhz and HURRAY! i got 60 fps very much stable in NFSIII, only a few hiccup , 3 or 4 times in total during first race at 4 laps. Hiccup was at 50-55 fps for 3-5 seconds, it happens when i see smoke fog or A LOT of cars at same place, very rare. its much better now, but im not perfect satisfied because In Porsche unleashed its not perfect.

In NFS Porsche At 1024x768x32bits highest setting , at least its very playable , but far from perfect: 35 to 45 fps with cars and 55 fps with no cars. I would have prefer near 60 fps.

Now for need for speed hot pursuit2 its only playable at lowest graphics setting in 640x480 for 35-55fps but it looks like garbage 🤣! Even with all setting at 2/4 settings like at Low settings instead of lowest its not really playable im just at 640x480. i got 17-20fps with a lot of cars and 25 with a few cars. 30-40 no cars at all. i tried at medium graphics and 640 x 480 its horrible like 8 to 14fps. So i believe its a gpu bottleneck. and for

For Porsche unleashed i think its gpu bottleneck too if i want to get 60fps in 1024x768. But i dont care much of Hot Pursuit 2 , but i will take it too more playable if possible. and just for fun i will try NFS Underground 2, i have minimum requirement but i think it will play like garbage even at lowest settings.

Dont forget the Geforce 4 mx440SE is only 64bit and i think its similar to normal Geforce 2 mx . I dont think its enough for me. I know Bloodem you think its enough, but i want more performance at 1024x768 in NFS Porsche and HotPursuit2 if its possible. And i want more fps in porsche unleashed like near 60 fps, even if its not perfect stable thats fine, i will live with it. And i want Hot Pursuit ii to be more playable at medium graphics. i dont hope for perfect 60fps at 1024 x 768 because im not sure its realism with my P3 933mhz. But who knows? But i want to keep my P3 933mhz, i want to keep it. maybe i will upgrade to a better P3 Cpu but only in some months, all P3 cpu more than 1ghz are expensive.

So What is the best AGP videocards i can buy ?

( with my voodoo 3 pci already in the system soon)

I want more gpu performance than gf4 mx440SE and gf2 mx200( that last card suck at 64bit)
Thanks for suggestions.

( i received a geforce 256 DDR it runs pretty well, probably better than mx440SE but it has a important defect, my father try to repair it earlier today. we changed caps, make soldering, clean the card... The glitchs are strange i cant find any one with that problem. i will try to explain. It happens only with Black and grey colors. its look like black smearing banding. anything black or grey have a left and right trail of black or grey smearing. yeah its strange. i played 1h of NFS games with the card, it works great except for the black smearing banding. Any ideas?

Anyway, any suggestions guys and Bloodem ?
I understand that i need a Geforce card that a P3 933mhz can run without too much overhead driver and that wont cause too much CPU bottleneck. But i will play most of my win98 games in 1024x768, if the game permit it 😀

Thanks in advance.

( Note1: These are my favorites cards of the past, you can pick one in my favorites one too:
Geforce 256 DDR, GF2 GTS, Geforce 3 Ti200, Geforce 4 Ti4200, Gf4 Mx440 128bit, Geforce 6600, Geforce 6800, Geforce 6800 GT)
( But Honestly Some of them are too much expensive) 😉

(Note2: gf2 gts is enough expensive and im not sure its enough for my need ? Maybe i should get gf4 mx 440 at 128bit ? But is it enough ? And i have a friend deal right now, i can get a Geforce 3 Ti200 for 20$ But is it strong enough ? 6.4gb memory bandwidth still better than 2.38 of my mx440 SE. )

Thanks guys for your agp Geforce videocards suggestions. I want to keep my P3 at 933mhz and install my voodoo3 in pci.

AND i will play only win98 games and some dos games, NO WINXP. ( but i mostly use my p233mmx for dos games) Maybe i will try overclocking the P3 because i think i have a great board for that. Ok thanks in advance. Im going to sleep ZZZzzz 😀

EDIT: I JUST MADE SOME CORRECTION to my LONG text and grammar.im Sorry my english is not perfect.

Last edited by renejr902 on 2020-08-24, 11:59. Edited 3 times in total.

Reply 11 of 97, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Download the Coolbits registry tweak from Phil's website. It will unlock several new settings in the drivers, including V-sync control.

There's already excellent tweaker called RivaTuner for Vsync and much more. Use version 2.22.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 12 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

EDIT: I JUST MADE SOME CORRECTION to my LONG text and grammar.im Sorry my english is not perfect.

Thanks yes i will install Phil Tweak tomorrow. I will look at Riva Turner 2.22 too.

Note: I will update Benchmark results tomorrow.

Last edited by renejr902 on 2020-08-24, 11:51. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 13 of 97, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
The Serpent Rider wrote on 2020-08-24, 11:43:

There's already excellent tweaker called RivaTuner for Vsync and much more. Use version 2.22.

It depends on how much you want to tweak.

For just enabling V-sync, the registry tweak does the job. It simply unhides the V-sync option in the official Nvidia driver panel. But if you want to go more in-depth and adjust a bunch of other stuff as well, then yes RivaTuner is what you need.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium

Reply 14 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
The Serpent Rider wrote on 2020-08-24, 11:43:
Joseph_Joestar wrote on 2020-08-24, 08:11:

Download the Coolbits registry tweak from Phil's website. It will unlock several new settings in the drivers, including V-sync control.

There's already excellent tweaker called RivaTuner for Vsync and much more. Use version 2.22.

Ok thanks , i will look at both of them. Any Geforce videocard suggestion ? ( read my last very long post, i got good result with mx440se and NFS III but i want more performance 😀 more fps for NFS Porsche and HotPursuit2 too if possible.

Do you have any Geforce videocard suggestions for running my NFS games in 1024x768 with my P3 933mhz. I will read your suggestions tomorrow , i really have to sleep ZZZzzz. Thanks a lot !

Last edited by Stiletto on 2020-08-24, 22:26. Edited 2 times in total.

Reply 15 of 97, by bloodem

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I just saw that you opened another thread 😁 Go with the GeForce 3 Ti 200 + Detonator 7.76 (forced install). This combo should be perfect for playing a lot of Win98 games at 1280 x 1024 or even 1600 x 1200.

2 x PLCC-68 / 4 x PGA132 / 5 x Skt 3 / 1 x Skt 4 / 9 x Skt 7 / 12 x SS7 / 1 x Skt 8 / 14 x Slot 1 / 6 x Slot A
5 x Skt 370 / 8 x Skt A / 2 x Skt 478 / 2 x Skt 754 / 3 x Skt 939 / 7 x LGA775 / 1 x LGA1155
Current PC: Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Backup: Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Reply 16 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
bloodem wrote on 2020-08-24, 11:59:

I just saw that you opened another thread 😁 Go with the GeForce 3 Ti 200 + Detonator 7.76 (forced install). This combo should be perfect for playing a lot of Win98 games at 1280 x 1024 or even 1600 x 1200.

Ok great ! thanks Bloodem i will buy it. and thanks Joseph for ti4200 suggestion. But ti4200 is really a lot expensive, i just checked ebay.

Bloodem do you know if Geforce 3 Ti200 exist with 64 bit memory ? I dont want to buy any 64 bit memory version in error. i will try to verify if its 128 bit memory. Thanks

Edit: i just saw your Build Joseph ! Ah! We have pretty much the same case you and me. My P3 is a Aopen case pretty much identical.

Reply 17 of 97, by bloodem

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You're welcome. All GeForce 3 Ti 200 have DDR memory and an 128 bit memory bus. The only difference between Ti 200 and Ti 500 is the GPU/memory clock speed.
Regarding GeForce 4 Ti 4200, I actually tested it on a Pentium 3 700 @ 933 MHz a week ago, it's quite a bit slower than a GeForce 2 GTS on this CPU (because of the newer drivers). Though, since you are heavily CPU bottlenecked, you can play many games at 1600 x 1200. Anyway, if you can get one cheap, I would definitely buy it... it's an awesome card for an Athlon XP / Pentium 4 CPU.

Last edited by bloodem on 2020-08-24, 12:14. Edited 1 time in total.

2 x PLCC-68 / 4 x PGA132 / 5 x Skt 3 / 1 x Skt 4 / 9 x Skt 7 / 12 x SS7 / 1 x Skt 8 / 14 x Slot 1 / 6 x Slot A
5 x Skt 370 / 8 x Skt A / 2 x Skt 478 / 2 x Skt 754 / 3 x Skt 939 / 7 x LGA775 / 1 x LGA1155
Current PC: Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Backup: Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Reply 18 of 97, by devius

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Only the crappiest (entry) graphics cards have reduced memory buses, so basically anything with MX, SE, LE, 5200 in the name. The GeForce 3 Ti200 is a mid-range card so it has the full 128-bit bus.

Reply 19 of 97, by renejr902

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
bloodem wrote on 2020-08-24, 12:10:

You're welcome. All GeForce 3 Ti 200 have DDR memory and an 128 bit memory bus. The only difference between Ti 200 and Ti 500 is the GPU/memory clock speed.
Regarding GeForce 4 Ti 4200, I actually tested it on a Pentium 3 700 @ 933 MHz a week ago, it's quite a bit slower than a GeForce 2 GTS on this CPU (because of the newer drivers).

- Ok thanks a lot ! Is the Geforce 3 ti200 better than GF4 MX440 with 128bit memory ? and is it better than gf2 gts ? and bettercthan geforce 256 ddr?

- So is it sure i can force detonator driver on Geforce 3 ti200 and how i do this ?

- Do you still have others geforce Suggestion Bloodem ? I will call my friend tomorrow for the gf3 ti200. But just in case he change his mind about selling, i prefer have another suggestion ?

Is the Next one in the list can be Gf4 MX 440 128 bit or Gf2 GTS ? which one is better for my system ? is the gf4 mx440 128 bit still a good choice ?

Thanks Devius for answer about that. 😀

THANKS A LOT guys and Bloodem, Joseph, Serpent.. ! ZZZzzz im sleepy !