First post, by Soap
- Rank
- Newbie
So after posting my old system that I brought back to life from my parents loft I completed some benchmarks with my Tualatin 1.4GHz and Celeron 1.3GHz, all that was changed in the computer was CPU and cooler, each benchmark was on default 3dmark settings and GPU running at stock.
Gigabyte GA-60XT intel 815EP
Colorful Geforce 2 GTS Pro AGP 32MB DDR
512 MB PC133 Samsung RAM (2x256MB)
10GB HDD ATA-66
Win98 SE USP 2.1A
230 WATT original PSU
The RAM ran at PC100 on the Celeron due to the 100MHz FSB, RAM timings was
CAS - 3
Tras/TRC - 7/9
Ras to Cas - 3
Ras Precharge - 3
The same RAM ran at PC133 on the Tualatin due to the 133MHz FSB, RAM timings was
CAS - 2
Tras/TRX - 5/7
Ras to Cas - 2
Ras precharge - 2
3DMARK 99 MAX-
Celeron 1.3GHz
7174 3DMarks
16718 CPU Marks
Tualatin 1.4GHz
7411 3dMarks
22450 CPU Marks
3Dmark 2000-
Celeron 1.3GHz
6621 3DMarks
479 CPU Marks
Tualatin
8111 3DMarks
681 CPU Marks
3dMark 2001 (cant seem to find a CPU score)-
Celeron 1.3GHz
3136 3DMarks
Tualatin 1.4GHz
3816 3DMarks
Anyway I just carried out the above out of interest and forgot all about the performance difference as this stuff has been in the loft for nearly twenty years, below I'll leave a link to the system to the post of the system complete with pictures.
Think I'll be sticking with the Tualatin for now and I'll try find the 9700 Pro, hopefully it works unlike my ATI R6 SG32M PCI 🙁