Merovign wrote on 2020-04-27, 00:56:

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-26, 18:56:

Thanks. Yes, it does look cool, and it extends the life of my 6569-R5 chip. I have a near perfect image from this machine now. As I have recapped it, heatsinked chips that gets hot and I am using a high quality Video cable. And no. No need for oil or water cooling. The board is working perfect now, and I hate the thought of liquid inside a computer.

Liquid cooling is why I'll probably never have a quad-core G5 Powermac. The sad thing is, if you get hold of one, apparently you can switch to air cooling and it works *fine*.

I saw those on youtube. It was a dead machine, were the liquid have spilled and corroded the machine inside.

H3nrik V! wrote on 2020-04-27, 06:33:

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-26, 21:12:

darry wrote on 2020-04-26, 20:18:

I also agree with good and even overkill cooling, especially when dealing with parts that are getting harder and harder to source . Heat is the enemy .

So true... So true. That is why I have done overkill cooling in my Amiga600 as well.

My Amiga600 on my blog

Wow, talk about upgrading an Amiga 😀

What do you use your Amigas for with that amount of upgrades? I suspect not only playing Lemmings and Ports of Call?

Well....
My Amiga600 is upgraded, because I get a few features extra this way. (CPU and Memory wise). Nearly all my Amiga's have a scandoubler, because I want to use LCD monitors. They are actually not that upgraded, compared to something like a Vampire accelerator. That thing is a monster. I am however playing with WHD-Loader on my Amiga600, just for the kick's of messing around with it. I like diskette's, and I have like 400/450 of those in disk boxes with Amiga software on them. And I will keep using them, untill they are all dead. Then I will get Gotek drives for them all. I have other Amiga's, and if you like really special machines, then look for my "Amiga500 in Desktop Case" on the blog. It is not fast, yet the goal for that, was to build something with the muscles/speed of a stock 500. Yet with features and in a desktop case. 😀

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-27, 07:14:

H3nrik V! wrote on 2020-04-27, 06:33:

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-26, 21:12:

So true... So true. That is why I have done overkill cooling in my Amiga600 as well.

My Amiga600 on my blog

Wow, talk about upgrading an Amiga 😀

What do you use your Amigas for with that amount of upgrades? I suspect not only playing Lemmings and Ports of Call?

Well....
My Amiga600 is upgraded, because I get a few features extra this way. (CPU and Memory wise). Nearly all my Amiga's have a scandoubler, because I want to use LCD monitors. They are actually not that upgraded, compared to something like a Vampire accelerator. That thing is a monster. I am however playing with WHD-Loader on my Amiga600, just for the kick's of messing around with it. I like diskette's, and I have like 400/450 of those in disk boxes with Amiga software on them. And I will keep using them, untill they are all dead. Then I will get Gotek drives for them all. I have other Amiga's, and if you like really special machines, then look for my "Amiga500 in Desktop Case" on the blog. It is not fast, yet the goal for that, was to build something with the muscles/speed of a stock 500. Yet with features and in a desktop case. 😀

Gives me ideas for one of my A600s. I have two in very good original condition.

Caluser2000 wrote on 2020-04-27, 07:53:

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-27, 07:14:

H3nrik V! wrote on 2020-04-27, 06:33:

Wow, talk about upgrading an Amiga 😀

What do you use your Amigas for with that amount of upgrades? I suspect not only playing Lemmings and Ports of Call?

Well....
My Amiga600 is upgraded, because I get a few features extra this way. (CPU and Memory wise). Nearly all my Amiga's have a scandoubler, because I want to use LCD monitors. They are actually not that upgraded, compared to something like a Vampire accelerator. That thing is a monster. I am however playing with WHD-Loader on my Amiga600, just for the kick's of messing around with it. I like diskette's, and I have like 400/450 of those in disk boxes with Amiga software on them. And I will keep using them, untill they are all dead. Then I will get Gotek drives for them all. I have other Amiga's, and if you like really special machines, then look for my "Amiga500 in Desktop Case" on the blog. It is not fast, yet the goal for that, was to build something with the muscles/speed of a stock 500. Yet with features and in a desktop case. 😀

Gives me ideas for one of my A600s. I have two in very good original condition.

Sweet.... Just avoid upgrading an Revision 1.3 motherboard. It is not worth it. As far as I understand, by looking around. Is that the 1.3 board is the biggest PITA to work with. Many upgrades does simply not work and a lot of upgrades make the machine buggy and unstable. The 1.5 is better, however it can have minor incompatibility issues. Like on my 1.5 Amiga600, I have not been able to run other burned kickstarts than the 3.1.4 that I bought. And it was not stable enough. The Cloanto branded 2.05 rom that I bought, did not work at all and the Cloanto branded 1.3/3.1-two-in-one rom, did not work eighter. In my 1.5 Amiga600, the only kickstart rom chips that work reliable, are the original ones, made by Commodore. And then again, some revision 1.5 boards work perfect with these thing's. It is a hit-n-miss game with the Amiga600.

Are you thinking about doing a desktop version of one of your Amiga600's? As there are these PlexiGlass cases already made for Amiga600. It is a desktop-kind-of case.

https://www.plexilaser.de/Acrylglas-Gehaeuse- … a-600-Teilesatz

EDIT:
I am thinking about getting one of them cases, and then convert my original 600-case, into a RPI machine. Using non-destructive 3D-Printed brackets and a KeyRah keyboard controller. It is just cooling that I am a bit worried about.

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:12:

Sweet.... Just avoid upgrading an Revision 1.3 motherboard. It is not worth it. As far as I understand, by looking around. Is that the 1.3 board is the biggest PITA to work with. Many upgrades does simply not work and a lot of upgrades make the machine buggy and unstable.

I no longer have my Rev 1.3 Amiga, but that was upgradable just fine and did also run stable. Only 1.0 and 1.1 should be avoided, as these are the ones which actually have issues with many upgrades. There's virtually no difference between Rev. 1.3 and 1.5. Only some traces of the video circuitry were routed differently to catch less interference. If people have issues with stability, it's mostly because of bad caps, not revision of the mainboard.

That's a picture of my Rev. 1.3 at its final stage before I sold it:

Rev. 1.5 has no issues running burnt Kickstart ROMs either. Here's an old picture of my Rev. 1.5 with the Kickstart 3.1 burnt to an EPROM:

Having said that, the ROMs by Cloanto are crap anyway.

See My Amigas for an overview of my current Amigas.

I made some 6x86MX vs Pentium MMX 200MHz Quake/Quake2 benchmark comparison tables and charts as part of my 1997 Budget Build project..

No I'm not going to convert a A600 to a desktop case. It's just not worth it imho and I quite like the original form factor. My priority systems are Acorn Risc systems and pre '98 x86 (socket 7 and super socket 7 mainly) systems. Far easier to upgrade at a reasonable cost. I have plenty of spares for both these type of systems. Software is also readily available for them at almost no cost. For example I've just done a Net install of Duvian Jessie on a K6-2 266 test rig with usb 2.0

derSammler wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:34:

I no longer have my Rev 1.3 Amiga, but that was upgradable just fine and did also run stable. Only 1.0 and 1.1 should be avoided […]
Show full quote

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:12:

Sweet.... Just avoid upgrading an Revision 1.3 motherboard. It is not worth it. As far as I understand, by looking around. Is that the 1.3 board is the biggest PITA to work with. Many upgrades does simply not work and a lot of upgrades make the machine buggy and unstable.

I no longer have my Rev 1.3 Amiga, but that was upgradable just fine and did also run stable. Only 1.0 and 1.1 should be avoided, as these are the ones which actually have issues with many upgrades. There's virtually no difference between Rev. 1.3 and 1.5. Only some traces of the video circuitry were routed differently to catch less interference. If people have issues with stability, it's mostly because of bad caps, not revision of the mainboard.

That's a picture of my Rev. 1.3 at its final stage before I sold it:

P1300971.JPG

Rev. 1.5 has no issues running burnt Kickstart ROMs either. Here's an old picture of my Rev. 1.5 with the Kickstart 3.1 burnt to an EPROM:

P9191199.JPG

Having said that, the ROMs by Cloanto are crap anyway.

I used all day, yesterday. Searching for information on issues. Most blogposts around, agree that it is the 1.3 that are causing most issues. As an example, then the 1.3 will not run with an Apollo-030, unless you do some tricks. http://www.amiga600.de/whatneed.htm Also, it is mentioned here. http://wiki.classicamiga.com/A600_Upgrade_Options And I can read on the last link that I post, that Rev 1.5 to 2, works fine with that accelerator, and working fine with other ones as well. Seems like the issue is not 100% to the board revision eighter, as there are issues with Gale Revision 1. Perhaps those that have a rev 1.3 Amiga600 motherboard, and issues, have Gayle 1.0 and those were it works have Gayle 2.0? Uhhh... And that link I was talking about. https://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=63530

Caluser2000 wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:47:

No I'm not going to convert a A600 to a desktop case. It's just not worth it imho and I quite like the original form factor. My priority systems are Acorn Risc systems and pre '98 x86 (socket 7 and super socket 7 mainly) systems. Far easier to upgrade at a reasonable cost. I have plenty of spares for both these type of systems. Software is also readily available for them at almost no cost. For example I've just done a Net install of Duvian Jessie on a K6-2 266 test rig with usb 2.0

Well... To each, their own "poison". Right? 😉

derSammler wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:34:

Rev. 1.5 has no issues running burnt Kickstart ROMs either. Here's an old picture of my Rev. 1.5 with the Kickstart 3.1 burnt to […]
Show full quote

Rev. 1.5 has no issues running burnt Kickstart ROMs either. Here's an old picture of my Rev. 1.5 with the Kickstart 3.1 burnt to an EPROM:

P9191199.JPG

Having said that, the ROMs by Cloanto are crap anyway.

See My Amigas for an overview of my current Amigas.

Yup.... I have had my fair share of issues with Burned rom's on my Rev 1.5 and I can fully live with Kickstart 2.05 (37.350). As anything above, seems a bit off and odd to me. The 600 is for me, strongly tied with kickstart 2.x as that was what I saw and that was how the 600 was used back when I was a teenager in 1992. Back then, one would dream about unobtainable 030-Amiga's with tons of Ram.

brostenen wrote on 2020-04-27, 09:03:

Caluser2000 wrote on 2020-04-27, 08:47:

No I'm not going to convert a A600 to a desktop case. It's just not worth it imho and I quite like the original form factor. My priority systems are Acorn Risc systems and pre '98 x86 (socket 7 and super socket 7 mainly) systems. Far easier to upgrade at a reasonable cost. I have plenty of spares for both these type of systems. Software is also readily available for them at almost no cost. For example I've just done a Net install of Duvian Jessie on a K6-2 266 test rig with usb 2.0

Well... To each, their own "poison". Right? 😉

Indeedy. I'll get a scandoubler eventually.

Received a UNOCart today for my Atari 2600 -

So I've been setting up an SD Card and playing a few classic games. The UNOCart is a bit of a pain due to the 80 files per folder limit, but otherwise is working great.

Been playing a bit of Pitfall, Pitfall II, Frogger & Donkey Kong so far.

Also received another game for my recently acquired SNES - Stunt Race FX and had a quick play with that earlier.

Rehoused my Penitum 233 MMX machine in this nice desktop case. 3 digit MHZ readout which is a real nice bonus. The Machine does has functioning turbo so display switches from 233 to 175

I just spent over an hour dismantling an older laptop with what felt like a thousand screws, litterally had to take apart every little thing and unplug every connector to actually get to the CPU... only to realize that merom != merom... the 7200 is a socket M cpu and I need a socket P cpu ._____.

imi wrote on 2020-04-27, 16:53:

I just spent over an hour dismantling an older laptop with what felt like a thousand screws, litterally had to take apart every little thing and unplug every connector to actually get to the CPU... only to realize that merom != merom... the 7200 is a socket M cpu and I need a socket P cpu ._____.

Is it one of those evil Dell Vostros/Inspirons?

imi wrote on 2020-04-27, 16:53:

I just spent over an hour dismantling an older laptop with what felt like a thousand screws, litterally had to take apart every little thing and unplug every connector to actually get to the CPU... only to realize that merom != merom... the 7200 is a socket M cpu and I need a socket P cpu ._____.

I felt the same way when I had to get into my P75 Toshiba Satellite - as well my Armada 1750 and 4/25 LTE are at least a 30 minute job to take apart everything before you get access to what you need.

Today I finished cleaning and setting up my retro PC "laboratory" (totally NOT a computer parts storage room as well) and I think it came out pretty good.

The only downside is that Windows XP decided to let me down for no reason at the exact moment I was taking this photo. I tried to take another photo, but it wouldn't boot anymore.

Replacing a fan in a laptop HP 250 G6 (1XN81EA)
inside a huge ball of dust

Spent the last few evenings gaming on my 486sx50. Really enjoying this machine and seeing what it can do.

I have noticed this banding in certain resolutions with this vga card. The issue remains on the 3 systems I have tested it on.

Has anyone seen this before?

LewisRaz wrote on 2020-04-27, 20:23:

Spent the last few evenings gaming on my 486sx50. Really enjoying this machine and seeing what it can do.

I have noticed this banding in certain resolutions with this vga card. The issue remains on the 3 systems I have tested it on.

Has anyone seen this before?

Ahhh... Spaghetti lines... The monitor inerpret the signal incorrectly and tries to compensate.
What you need, is eighter a CRT monitor or a GFX card with a better output.
These lines tends to show up, mostly on ISA and VLB vcards, however I have seen it with PCI as well.