First post, by bluejeans
Still not familiar with this kind of bus ratio adjustment.
Still not familiar with this kind of bus ratio adjustment.
3/2 = 1.5x (and 3.5x)
2/1 = 2x
3/1 = 3x
5/2 = 2.5x
😀
New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.
wrote:3/2 = 1.5x (and 3.5x) 2/1 = 2x 3/1 = 3x 5/2 = 2.5x […]
3/2 = 1.5x (and 3.5x)
2/1 = 2x
3/1 = 3x
5/2 = 2.5x😀
So this board allows underclocking? For overclocking it has a huge heatsink on it, twice the size of the cpu and 4cm high, the 133 in it might just get to 166.
Sure, you can set the 133 as low as 1,5x 50 or 75mhz.
asus tx97-e, 233mmx, voodoo1, s3 virge ,sb16
asus p5a, k6-3+ @ 550mhz, voodoo2 12mb sli, gf2 gts, awe32
asus p3b-f, p3-700, voodoo3 3500TV agp, awe64
asus tusl2-c, p3-S 1,4ghz, voodoo5 5500, live!
asus a7n8x DL, barton cpu, 6800ultra, Voodoo3 pci, audigy1
wrote:Sure, you can set the 133 as low as 1,5x 50 or 75mhz.
Is it true that pentiums are double the clock speed of a 486, e.g a pentium 100 being twice as fast as a 486-100?
wrote:wrote:Sure, you can set the 133 as low as 1,5x 50 or 75mhz.
Is it true that pentiums are double the clock speed of a 486, e.g a pentium 100 being twice as fast as a 486-100?
In ideal circumstances, meaning that they're running Pentium-optimized code, yes, due to the fact that it would be keeping the dual pipelines filled. But we don't live in a perfect world and ideal circumstances are rarely in effect, so, running code meant for older x86 chips it wouldn't necessarily be twice as fast but it would still have a significant advantage.
Nanto: H61H2-AM3, 4GB, GTS250 1GB, SB0730, 512GB SSD, XP USP4
Rithwic: EP-61BXM-A, Celeron 300A@450, 768MB, GF2MX400/V2, YMF744, 128GB SD2IDE, 98SE (Kex)
Cragstone: Alaris Cougar, 486BL2-66, 16MB, GD5428 VLB, CT2800, 16GB SD2IDE, 95CNOIE