VOGONS


First post, by sanguine

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello everyone,

I am currently putting together a W98 based build for late 90s retro gaming. By design I've thought of having a spacious 64GB (excessive I know) CF card to store my games without worries, however, as I hook up the card, the BIOS fails to detect its full capacity. I've used WHATIDE along with IDEINFO to gets the card's geometry and apparently the BIOS got the CHS value correctly but I believe got the sector size wrong. So now my questions are: Would increasing the heads value or the sectors value to get more space cause any stability problem? And would it damage the card? Thanks in advance.

PS: The card name is Sandisk Extreme 64GB CF (SDCFXS-064G).

EjYzhuy.jpg
v48G92G.jpg
FpyU7Dc.jpg

Reply 1 of 4, by weedeewee

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

damage it?
normally, no.

Right to repair is fundamental. You own it, you're allowed to fix it.
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Do not ask Why !
https://www.vogonswiki.com/index.php/Serial_port

Reply 2 of 4, by jakethompson1

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
sanguine wrote on 2021-11-08, 17:40:

Hello everyone,

I am currently putting together a W98 based build for late 90s retro gaming. By design I've thought of having a spacious 64GB (excessive I know) CF card to store my games without worries, however, as I hook up the card, the BIOS fails to detect its full capacity. I've used WHATIDE along with IDEINFO to gets the card's geometry and apparently the BIOS got the CHS value correctly but I believe got the sector size wrong. So now my questions are: Would increasing the heads value or the sectors value to get more space cause any stability problem? And would it damage the card? Thanks in advance.

PS: The card name is Sandisk Extreme 64GB CF (SDCFXS-064G).

The number of heads can't go higher than 255, nor can the number of sectors go higher than 63, there simply aren't enough bits in the fields that define these to go higher.

You are hitting into the 33.8GB BIOS limitation. See the last entry on: http://howto.hpl.ddo.jp/Large-Disk-HOWTO-4.html#ss4.2

The utilities you are running are from 1995 and 1991, so they are even older than the BIOS.

If you want more you either need translation software such as EZ-Drive or OnTrack, or for a hardware solution, the XT-IDE Universal BIOS. Unless of course, a BIOS update is out there for your board.

Reply 3 of 4, by dormcat

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

What's the make and model of your motherboard, as well as its BIOS version? Seeing "2002" on the copyright line; BIOS of 2002 or later should be able to handle LBA up to 137 GB.

Reply 4 of 4, by sanguine

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
dormcat wrote on 2021-11-08, 20:15:

What's the make and model of your motherboard, as well as its BIOS version? Seeing "2002" on the copyright line; BIOS of 2002 or later should be able to handle LBA up to 137 GB.

jakethompson1 wrote on 2021-11-08, 19:30:
The number of heads can't go higher than 255, nor can the number of sectors go higher than 63, there simply aren't enough bits i […]
Show full quote

The number of heads can't go higher than 255, nor can the number of sectors go higher than 63, there simply aren't enough bits in the fields that define these to go higher.

You are hitting into the 33.8GB BIOS limitation. See the last entry on: http://howto.hpl.ddo.jp/Large-Disk-HOWTO-4.html#ss4.2

The utilities you are running are from 1995 and 1991, so they are even older than the BIOS.

If you want more you either need translation software such as EZ-Drive or OnTrack, or for a hardware solution, the XT-IDE Universal BIOS. Unless of course, a BIOS update is out there for your board.

Currently I'm on a Gigabyte GA-60-XT, just freshly recapped :p. Gigabyte added 137GB update since 2001/12/24 and currently I'm on the newest BIOS already (2002/12/17), a 80GB Seagate HDD works just fine, not this CF card thou.