Kahenraz wrote on 2022-03-04, 06:42:
Can you scan that paper covering the AGP slot? I'm curious as to what it says.
Absolutely! My apologies for the not-so-good angle, but here’s a couple of photos.
The attachment 712E0786-7089-4385-BE4E-06672C458A05.jpeg is no longer available
The attachment A1B4FE4E-AE0A-4126-862B-397B5B2ADF75.jpeg is no longer available
bjwil1991 wrote on 2022-03-04, 07:30:I see a bunch of video cards listed on that sticker. Maybe that's which cards the AGP slot supports per se, but I digress. Probably a warning saying to not use AGP 1x cards in there or probably something else. I've seen something like that before many years ago.
It seems to be. What I find most interesting is that the sticker mentions “Manual Page Index II” and my copy of the original manual that came with this board seems to utterly lack any such index. Perhaps these issues were remedied at some point? My board seems to be PCB Rev. 5.
Cuttoon wrote on 2022-03-04, 08:18:It's probably pretty much unknown in the states, but Miro was a rather prominent brand in Germany those days. They made, at leas […]
Show full quote
WJG6260 wrote on 2022-03-04, 05:13:
Recently picked up this fascinating VLB card. Gotta say, it’s pretty darn fast.
It's probably pretty much unknown in the states, but Miro was a rather prominent brand in Germany those days. They made, at least, VGA and sound cards and CRT screens.
I own a Miro Highscore Voodoo1 - known for its shamefully proprietary loop cable.
A Miro Crystal 10 SD happens to be the first VGA card I ever bought. It made do with the S3 805 chip, which is ok, but nothing to write home about. It could be maxed out at 2 MB, your's appears to have 4, which is pretty elite as well.
The 10SD can be set to decent refresh rates via DIP switches on the backplate. The RAMDAC on yours has a higher number, there should be some driver to do the same.
Thanks for showing me a 20SD for the first time - always wondered whether it was merely a 10SD that came with 2 MB, but no, it's way better. Nice find.
Hey, thanks for the information! I’ve got a couple of Miro, ELSA, and SPEA cards and can say they’re all really top-notch. It’s confusing to me how they had seemingly no US presence and yet some OEMs like Compaq used ELSA cards for workstations. I always found that kind of odd.
The Highscore is an awesome card. I believe the loop cable it uses is the same as one used by Sigma Designs for some sort of MPEG or capture card? I can’t remember precisely what it’s for, but I’m pretty sure those two are interchangeable, but don’t quote me on it. The Highscore’s 6MB always fascinated me. In some ways, I’ve always been more partial to the V1 in quirky configurations, including the Rush.
I’ve had great luck with 805s and, actually, my Diamond Stealth24 is roughly as fast as this card, being at worst some 7% off in benchmarks. The Miro 10SD is a really nice one; that extra MB would be helpful in Windows, no? As for the 20SD, unfortunately it’s only 2MB, but that’s definitely plenty for my purposes. I will say that the RAMDAC utility is something I’ll keep an eye out for—thanks for that suggestion!
These older cards can sometimes be tricky with LCDs. I use a VisionRGB E1 for capture and it can handle some weird refresh rates pretty okay (I’ve got a borked ATi Rage Pro PCI that only displays 640x490 at like 80-something Hz and it can capture an imagine on it somehow).
pete8475 wrote on 2022-03-04, 08:31:WJG6260 wrote on 2022-03-04, 05:13:Also, I grabbed this PCChips M810LMR. It was ~$11, and it’s probably not worth that; I do have to say that it’s pretty nice for […]
Show full quote
Also, I grabbed this PCChips M810LMR. It was ~$11, and it’s probably not worth that; I do have to say that it’s pretty nice for what it is. It’s slower than my KT7A and AMD760-based GA-7DX, but still not that bad. It came with the original manual, disk, and AMR card.
The SiS730 itself really isn’t too bad. Sure, it’s an integrated chipset with sound, graphics, and the works all stuffed into it, but it’s pretty fast and very stable. Despite the usual shoddy PCChips quality, this board seems fun for testing. It’s perfect with an Athlon 1400 and even runs at 133/133 FSB/RAM, despite the manual seemingly insisting (contrary to SiS’s specifications) that the SiS “Thunderbird” chipset (as they deemed it) can only handle 100/133. Apparently the integrated MIDI isn’t half bad. SoundBlaster compatibility needs work and possibly some aspirin, to say the least…
Also, I probably need to update the bios on this thing as it does not like Athlon XPs very much. A 1700+ Palomino would run at 1100MHz, but not at 1466MHz; apparently it should be able to do the latter, so I’ll try a re-flash and see…
C4D5E2C0-B41A-4970-A7DE-8C3CB0FF42B3.jpeg
All those bad caps probably aren't helping anything.
Yeah, that’s one thing I noticed too when I got the board. They’re not as bad looking in person, granted I have awful eyesight. But they’re low-quality G-LUXON caps that I’ll replace when I’ve got the time. I do really appreciate the suggestion though; I suppose that could explain why it doesn’t want to run an AXP at full bore 🤣
It works stably now, but it’s more of a testing board than anything I guess.
ChrisK wrote on 2022-03-04, 09:28:I've received a similar board with this SiS chipset with a larger hardware bundle recently. It's an Elitegroup K7SEM.
It has a p […]
Show full quote
WJG6260 wrote on 2022-03-04, 05:13:
Also, I grabbed this PCChips M810LMR. It was ~$11, and it’s probably not worth that; I do have to say that it’s pretty nice for what it is. It’s slower than my KT7A and AMD760-based GA-7DX, but still not that bad. It came with the original manual, disk, and AMR card.
The SiS730 itself really isn’t too bad. Sure, it’s an integrated chipset with sound, graphics, and the works all stuffed into it, but it’s pretty fast and very stable. Despite the usual shoddy PCChips quality, this board seems fun for testing. It’s perfect with an Athlon 1400 and even runs at 133/133 FSB/RAM, despite the manual seemingly insisting (contrary to SiS’s specifications) that the SiS “Thunderbird” chipset (as they deemed it) can only handle 100/133. Apparently the integrated MIDI isn’t half bad. SoundBlaster compatibility needs work and possibly some aspirin, to say the least…
Also, I probably need to update the bios on this thing as it does not like Athlon XPs very much. A 1700+ Palomino would run at 1100MHz, but not at 1466MHz; apparently it should be able to do the latter, so I’ll try a re-flash and see…
I've received a similar board with this SiS chipset with a larger hardware bundle recently. It's an Elitegroup K7SEM.
It has a pretty much everything onboard that was needed for some lightweight office or casual gaming machine back then: VGA, Sound, ATA100, even LAN as I found out by chance (though it needs some special LAN bracket it unfortunately didn't came with, beeing the reason I didn't notice that feature at first).
I think I remember having seen some similar info about tested graphics card as on the sticker on the AGP slot of this M810LMR somewhere on the net, but I don't seem to be able to find it again...
The board is serving me as some testing rig for AGP cards with unknown working status at the moment, beeing paired with an Athlon XP 2000+. So I can confirm the chipset can work at 133/133 CPU/RAM without struggle (which can be set within the BIOS). The manual says there's one restriction: the RAM can not run slower than the CPU. So 100/133 CPU/RAM is ok, 133/100 is not. But that's not a real drawback imho.
I kind of like those SiS chipsets someway. I have boards with SiS 5582, 530, 630E / 630ET (latter one supports P3 Tualatins) and 730 right now and can't tell anything really negative about them. Might not be the fastest ones within their class but they are doing their thing. It's like with all oldies, if you need more speed get a newer ride.
Interesting! I think the K7SEM is this board’s cousin, from what I read. Seems like a great board and I’m with you—it’s nice to see everything neatly packaged here by SiS. It sure makes working on these boards easier, and it makes testing immeasurably simpler.
The M810LMR seems to not like certain AGP cards, including the V3. That’s fine by me I’d say, as the SiS 300 integrated setup is pretty decent overall and I’d rather use this board with a Duron and a Blade 9880 or something like that, just as an unconventional setup.
Thanks for the info on the chipset! That’s pretty interesting and makes sense. Sounds like the perfect board for your test case and, honestly, I think you’re right that the performance it offers is plenty. It’s actually not that much slower than a KT133A setup, in terms of memory performance and throughput.
SiS is an underrated chipset manufacturer. I really do agree with your takes on their products. Their integrated solutions are decent, and some of their performance chipsets are just top-of-the-top. The SiS5571 is excellent for its era and comparable to the 430HX, in some regards. It’s also quite good with Cyrix 6x86s. I’ve had luck with the 5591 as a stable AGP chipset for Socket 7, and it’s fast, even at 83MHz. SiS530 is pretty good too. Their later chipsets are also awesome; I’ve got a Pentium 4 board with the 645DX and it’s solid for AGP testing and tinkering. I’ve also got a Pentium M board with the SiS661FX, which I haven’t really messed with too much, but that should make a solid, solid Windows 9X machine.
I do also like some Via chipsets, despite the hate they often get. The 686 southbridge is sometimes wonky, but the 694X/Apollo Pro 133A and Via VPX have always worked well for me. The Via VP2 might be my favorite Socket 7 chipset not named 430HX.
-Live Long and Prosper-
Feel free to check out my YouTube and Twitter!