Mine is the atari 2600. I have a little over 100 atari 2600 games including kaboom and centipede and barnstormer. I got them used for very cheap. I got them for only 35 dollars canadian. That was really cheap.
DOS/Windows, MSX
The msx.The msx is not a computer i would want. The spectrum had much more games and their were much better games for the spectrum. Atari 2600 may lose everyday in the graphics section but some really good games were for the Atari 2600. The spectrum is almost as good as the 2600.
This is just my opinion though.
I thought you'd come up with something like turing machines 😀
ZX Spectrum, PC, DS
I have traveled across the universe and through the years to find Her.
Sometimes going all the way is just a start...
8086 PC (Amstrad PC2086 PVGA1A)
Intel i7 5960X
Gigabye GA-X99-Gaming 5
8 GB DDR4 (2100)
8 GB GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming (Gigabyte)
The amstrad was alright. The colour is a bit bright though.
He's not talking about the traditional "Amstrad CPC" that you're referring to but rather the IBM PC clone. Meanwhile abyss, most of your threads suck.
Well, "most" easily beats your dh4rm4, because they all suck: search.php?search_author=dh4rm4
DOSBox 60 seconds guide | How to ask questions
_________________
Lenovo M58p | Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66 GHz | Radeon R7 240 | LG HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH40N | Fedora 32
Please point out how they 'suck' exactly? Even wd responded to my post re : MC2. I'd say that's contribution. Meanwhile abyss has flooded the forums with irrelevant posts.....
you just shouldn't be too quick to point fingers if you are a "newbie" yourself.
Ok, but the assumption that I'm new to the world just because I'm new to posting here is wrong. I've been coming to VOGONS for years, I only registered to post recently. I'm not the only person who's mentioned that abyss' threads/approach as annoying..it's be commented by old and new users alike.
