VOGONS


First post, by zapbuzz

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hi my pentium III uses pc133 SDRAM.
What i'd like to know is if single or double sided memory are better for it.
Or even, high / low density.
As generations evolve, ram does too so I like to point out sdram is not DDR ram so please don't post about DDR ram (need veteran assist)
Thanks ~:)

Reply 1 of 4, by Doornkaat

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
zapbuzz wrote on 2022-04-25, 14:17:
Hi my pentium III uses pc133 SDRAM. What i'd like to know is if single or double sided memory are better for it. Or even, high / […]
Show full quote

Hi my pentium III uses pc133 SDRAM.
What i'd like to know is if single or double sided memory are better for it.
Or even, high / low density.
As generations evolve, ram does too so I like to point out sdram is not DDR ram so please don't post about DDR ram (need veteran assist)
Thanks ~:)

Please tell us the motherboard you're using and how much RAM you need. Without this info nobody will be able to give a definitive answer.
Also the usual DDR RAM is in fact SDRAM. What you mean is your system uses SDR SDRAM and not DDR SDRAM.

Reply 2 of 4, by zapbuzz

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Doornkaat wrote on 2022-04-25, 14:56:
zapbuzz wrote on 2022-04-25, 14:17:
Hi my pentium III uses pc133 SDRAM. What i'd like to know is if single or double sided memory are better for it. Or even, high / […]
Show full quote

Hi my pentium III uses pc133 SDRAM.
What i'd like to know is if single or double sided memory are better for it.
Or even, high / low density.
As generations evolve, ram does too so I like to point out sdram is not DDR ram so please don't post about DDR ram (need veteran assist)
Thanks ~:)

Please tell us the motherboard you're using and how much RAM you need. Without this info nobody will be able to give a definitive answer.
Also the usual DDR RAM is in fact SDRAM. What you mean is your system uses SDR SDRAM and not DDR SDRAM.

Thankyou friend my machine is Abit VP6 and is currently at its max capacity of 4 x 512mb ram they are pc133 and each stick is single sided I wanted to know if its more efficient than double chip sided sticks.

Reply 3 of 4, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Density is kinda relative, compared to what BX boards take, you've got high density RAM at present. However, finding lower density 512MB sticks that also run at PC133 may be hard.

There are supposed to be mild performance gains in sticking with the lowest density possible, but that tends to only be practical in "mid range" RAM loadouts, rather than when you want/need the fastest standard and the maximum capacity.

The theory is roughly analogized something like... if your RAM chips are warehouses and you've got one little robot in each fetching boxes for you, then you get better performance when you've got 16 robots fetching stuff in 16 smaller warehouses than if you only got 8 robots fetching stuff in 8 bigger warehouses.

edit: that might make it sound like it should be a much huger difference, but the 16WH robots would be fetching 4 boxes at once where the 8WH robots would be fetching 8 boxes at once, but still there's latency from covering twice the "floor area" etc.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 4 of 4, by zapbuzz

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
BitWrangler wrote on 2022-04-26, 13:57:
Density is kinda relative, compared to what BX boards take, you've got high density RAM at present. However, finding lower densi […]
Show full quote

Density is kinda relative, compared to what BX boards take, you've got high density RAM at present. However, finding lower density 512MB sticks that also run at PC133 may be hard.

There are supposed to be mild performance gains in sticking with the lowest density possible, but that tends to only be practical in "mid range" RAM loadouts, rather than when you want/need the fastest standard and the maximum capacity.

The theory is roughly analogized something like... if your RAM chips are warehouses and you've got one little robot in each fetching boxes for you, then you get better performance when you've got 16 robots fetching stuff in 16 smaller warehouses than if you only got 8 robots fetching stuff in 8 bigger warehouses.

edit: that might make it sound like it should be a much huger difference, but the 16WH robots would be fetching 4 boxes at once where the 8WH robots would be fetching 8 boxes at once, but still there's latency from covering twice the "floor area" etc.

okay 😁 i watched terminator genysis tonight what a coincidance ? you know how they always end up in warehouses .... Anyhow I'm thinking being high density but single sided theres less travel to throughput but I think I want a 2gb set of low density double sided to see any difference if any on bench now.... not warehouses 😁 🤣