Reply 45220 of 56695, by Gmlb256
TrashPanda wrote on 2022-06-17, 19:37:Intel really did shit the bed with Netburst and its super long pipeline.
Yep, Intel though that they could make a CPU that can scale to 10 GHz with those deeper pipelines but physical limitations killed that idea.
The only case where the P4 manages to show its strength is when you run software than can saturate the DDR bandwidth on the P3, the P4 simply has more but for gaming . .its no contest the P3 beats it.
Another case where the P4 really shows its strength is when SSE2 instructions are used and that was mainly with video encoders. On the other hand, NetBurst was inefficient in terms of performance per watt (and got much worse with Prescott) and software required specific optimizations to avoid the pitfalls.
The troubles with power consumption and heat dissipation led to the creation of the Pentium M (itself a derivative of the P6 microarchitecture) which paved the way for the Core microarchitecture years later.
VIA C3 Nehemiah 1.2A @ 1.46 GHz | ASUS P2-99 | 256 MB PC133 SDRAM | GeForce2 GTS 32 MB | Voodoo2 12 MB | SBLive! | AWE64 | SBPro2 | GUS