VOGONS


First post, by Batyra

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Hi Everyone!

For a long time I'm on a quest to build quite exotic machine Socket 4 VLB. I know that VLB has more sense with 486, but as I mentioned it is going to be exotic build.

I have not found anywhere this exactly motherboards scheme. The closest one (from the same manufacturer and very similar) is here: https://stason.org/TULARC/pc/motherboards/N/N … LEGANCE-PE.html

I have proper cache sticks - all tested, not fake etc. Tried it in other motherboard - working fine as 1M.

The problem is cache.
Motherboard does not recognize full 1MB, only 256. And I'm thinking what can I do to enable full 1MB. I'm thinking of placing three missing chips but I have to identify them first. Maybe some bios test from other motherboard?

Anyone have any clue what can I do? Maybe similar problem?

If anyone have similar Socket 4 + VLB + PCI motherboard PLEASE!! contact me.

Attachments

  • Filename
    MotherboardScheme.pdf
    File size
    328.64 KiB
    Downloads
    50 downloads
    File license
    GPL-2.0-or-later
  • zoom2.jpg
    Filename
    zoom2.jpg
    File size
    540.42 KiB
    Views
    1818 views
    File license
    Public domain
  • zoom1.jpg
    Filename
    zoom1.jpg
    File size
    647.6 KiB
    Views
    1818 views
    File license
    Public domain
  • motherboard.jpg
    Filename
    motherboard.jpg
    File size
    713.49 KiB
    Views
    1818 views
    File license
    Public domain
  • cache15ns.jpg
    Filename
    cache15ns.jpg
    File size
    412.42 KiB
    Views
    1818 views
    File license
    Public domain

Visit my website: http://www.collection.batyra.pl

Reply 2 of 21, by Batyra

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thak you for reply. Yes, of course. I've tried all obvious actions. And even trying two different (also tested) sets of cache sticks.

Visit my website: http://www.collection.batyra.pl

Reply 4 of 21, by CoffeeOne

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Batyra wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:46:

Thak you for reply. Yes, of course. I've tried all obvious actions. And even trying two different (also tested) sets of cache sticks.

That's weird.
So when you insert the 8 sticks of 128kx8 and close the 2 jumpers the Bios reports 256kb, right?
Is it really 256kB? Did you confirm it with a test program like speedsys?
When you have 256kB working with the 128kx8 sticks, it is very unlikely that the 128kx8 chips are bad. Could be a mainboard or Bios issue I believe.

Reply 5 of 21, by Roman555

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Batyra wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:23:

Anyone have any clue what can I do? Maybe similar problem?

Hi,
Have you known there's a schematic diagram for a PCI/VLB motherboard based on OPTi Python 82c547/82c546 chipset?
Will it help? Theoretically you will be able to understand whether electrical connections of cache banks are OK.

Attachments

  • Filename
    OPTI 82C547.rar
    File size
    1.56 MiB
    Downloads
    47 downloads
    File comment
    OPTi Python 82c547/82c546 schematic diagram
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

[ MS6168/PII-350/YMF754/98SE ]
[ 775i65G/E5500/9800Pro/Vortex2/ME ]

Reply 6 of 21, by majestyk

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
kixs wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:56:

I always thought the TAG has to be more then 256KB for 1MB cache. Usually 64K x 8.

This was my first guess also. But the DIL28 socket is limiting TAG size to 256K.

Some (rare) mainboards demanded a different TAG organisation like 16Kx16 (or whatever) instead of 32Kx8. These are sometimes hard to find.

Maybe there´s some info in the silkscreen printing inside the socket?

Reply 7 of 21, by Disruptor

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
kixs wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:56:

I always thought the TAG has to be more then 256KB for 1MB cache. Usually 64K x 8.

I think that's it.
It seems like that board will support 512 kB L2 cache with eight 64K x 8 plus tag with 32K x 8.

In my Shuttle HOT-433 I use eight 128K x 8 plus tag with 64K x 8.

Last edited by Disruptor on 2022-11-02, 18:31. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 8 of 21, by CoffeeOne

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Disruptor wrote on 2022-10-31, 20:46:
I think that's it. It seems like that board will support 512 kB L2 cache with eight 64K x 8 plus tag with 32K x 8. […]
Show full quote
kixs wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:56:

I always thought the TAG has to be more then 256KB for 1MB cache. Usually 64K x 8.

I think that's it.
It seems like that board will support 512 kB L2 cache with eight 64K x 8 plus tag with 32K x 8.

In my Shuttle HOT-433 I use eight 128K x 8 plus tag with 64K x 8.

Nope.
Obviously for that Pentium chipset 32Kx8 tag size is enough for 1MB cache. He attached the manual.

Reply 9 of 21, by Disruptor

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
CoffeeOne wrote on 2022-11-01, 15:46:

Nope.
Obviously for that Pentium chipset 32Kx8 tag size is enough for 1MB cache. He attached the manual.

Oops. Sure. It isn't a 486 xD
Yes, you're right then.
It's because the data bus width is 64 bit and there's just one bank, not two like on a 32 bit 486.

Reply 10 of 21, by Batyra

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thank you everyone for replying. Unfortunately no solutions found so far. Maybe some of you have "proper" manual? O knowledge of three chips that are missing?

Visit my website: http://www.collection.batyra.pl

Reply 11 of 21, by CoffeeOne

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Batyra wrote on 2022-11-02, 19:06:

Thank you everyone for replying. Unfortunately no solutions found so far. Maybe some of you have "proper" manual? O knowledge of three chips that are missing?

Hello,
Please answer my questions above.

Reply 12 of 21, by Batyra

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
CoffeeOne wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:58:
That's weird. So when you insert the 8 sticks of 128kx8 and close the 2 jumpers the Bios reports 256kb, right? Is it really 256k […]
Show full quote

That's weird.
So when you insert the 8 sticks of 128kx8 and close the 2 jumpers the Bios reports 256kb, right?
Is it really 256kB? Did you confirm it with a test program like speedsys?
When you have 256kB working with the 128kx8 sticks, it is very unlikely that the 128kx8 chips are bad. Could be a mainboard or Bios issue I believe.

When you put 1MB and jumpers are set as for 256 it recognizes 256... when jumpers are set to 1M there is "No cache".
Also the motherboard recognizes CPU (Pentium overdrive 133) as 100... but test proove it works as 133 - so motherboard issue.

Visit my website: http://www.collection.batyra.pl

Reply 13 of 21, by CoffeeOne

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Batyra wrote on 2022-11-02, 20:39:
CoffeeOne wrote on 2022-10-30, 08:58:
That's weird. So when you insert the 8 sticks of 128kx8 and close the 2 jumpers the Bios reports 256kb, right? Is it really 256k […]
Show full quote

That's weird.
So when you insert the 8 sticks of 128kx8 and close the 2 jumpers the Bios reports 256kb, right?
Is it really 256kB? Did you confirm it with a test program like speedsys?
When you have 256kB working with the 128kx8 sticks, it is very unlikely that the 128kx8 chips are bad. Could be a mainboard or Bios issue I believe.

When you put 1MB and jumpers are set as for 256 it recognizes 256... when jumpers are set to 1M there is "No cache".
Also the motherboard recognizes CPU (Pentium overdrive 133) as 100... but test proove it works as 133 - so motherboard issue.

Hi, OK:
for this case:
"
When you put 1MB and jumpers are set as for 256 it recognizes 256
"
Is the 256kB cache working in this case? Confirmed by speedsys?

Reply 15 of 21, by CoffeeOne

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Batyra wrote on 2022-11-04, 11:20:
CoffeeOne wrote on 2022-11-02, 22:28:

Is the 256kB cache working in this case? Confirmed by speedsys?

Yes

Hi, then I assume (to 99%) that your cache chips are good!
So I believe it can only be the jumper settings. I mean it could also be the case that the boards works fine with 256kb, and not correctly with 1MB, but that is unlikely for me.

Reply 16 of 21, by Batyra

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Problem solved!
I've tried different BIOS... it was from exactly (99%) the same motherboard from the same manufacturer and chipset but with socket 5 not socket 4... Revision of bios was the same - I was sure it's identical but after change all started to run!

It recognize my 133 overdrive as pentium 100 but it runs like it should... I think I'll ask someone who knows how to deal with micro-codes or how it is called to change it to be named properly!

Meanwhile - thanks to everyone who tried to help!

Attachments

  • 3.jpg
    Filename
    3.jpg
    File size
    298.02 KiB
    Views
    1382 views
    File license
    Public domain
  • 2.jpg
    Filename
    2.jpg
    File size
    296.71 KiB
    Views
    1382 views
    File license
    Public domain
  • 1.jpg
    Filename
    1.jpg
    File size
    205.8 KiB
    Views
    1382 views
    File license
    Public domain

Visit my website: http://www.collection.batyra.pl

Reply 18 of 21, by WJG6260

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Nice work on getting the cache working!

I’ve been meaning to chime in on this thread, as I own the Socket 5 version of this board.
In fact, if you got the BIOS from TRW, I dumped it for their archive.

One note about the Elegance P90’s BIOS that might be of interest to you: on the Socket 5 version of this board (and presumably, on your board with the appropriate adapter), you can run a WinChip, WinChip2, and even a POD MMX without issue. This is not the case for most Pentium/VL BIOSes.

I have had issues getting 1MB cache working on mine, but I presume it’s all jumper quirkiness.
Do you mind sharing your jumper settings? I am curious to see if I can get the same results on this board’s Socket 5 brother.

Great job, and I hope you enjoy this board! Socket 4 and VLB is a fun/weird/quirky adventure of its own!

-Live Long and Prosper-

Feel free to check out my YouTube and Twitter!