First post, by Jaron
- Rank
- Newbie
Joining this board has been hazardous to my wallet. Before, my leftover retro machines were good enough as is, and I never bothered to tweak them. But now, seeing how cheap some hardware has gotten on the second-hand market, I find myself thinking, "Hmm, it's only $30 for a much better GPU. And I could get that really nice sound card for only $40." Then you find you've nickel-and-dimed yourself to oblivion.
Anyway, my current XP machine is using an ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen 3 board that has both PCI and PCIe slots. Currently it's using a Live! 5.1 card and I'm considering upgrading it. In reading about the 20K E-mu chip, it seems the primary difference between the 20k1 and 20k2 chips are an added processor to deal with PCIe latency. So, in terms of the card slot itself, and not so much a given card's features, is there any benefit to using PCI or PCIe for WinXP? Is one inherently more compatible/stable with XP? For cards that support soundbanks, does either interface matter for loading the soundbank in system memory?
Another small consideration is that it seems far more PCI audio cards include game ports, and thus far I don't see a single PCIe card that does. So if I go to a PCIe card, I'd need to get a separate game port card. I suppose I could leave the Live! card installed just for the game port, but having three audio devices installed ( mboard has integrated RealTek ) seems to be inviting conflict and configuration problems.