VOGONS


First post, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'm doing a quick win98 build for all win9x games to be played on, from 1997's lego island, classics like max payne, upto 2004's myst IV.
it's going to be an LGA775 pentium4ht @3.2ghz with 512mb ram and, if it cooperates, nVidia 6200le video. nothing too fancy but a robust and capable thing made from what i already have on-hand. It's not going to be used for DOS/w3.x games however as i have a socket7 for those.
Question is - which of these 4 soundcards should i go for with the pentium4? the motherboard does have built-in sound, but i want to add a gameport so i can use my old sticks/gamepads without having to buy any more hardware, i suppose extra midi options beyond MSsoftsynth will be of benefit too.

Attachments

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 1 of 26, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

If you're planning on playing A3D supported games, I'd go with the Aureal Vortex based card.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 2 of 26, by Meatball

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Shponglefan wrote on 2023-01-19, 21:42:

If you're planning on playing A3D supported games, I'd go with the Aureal Vortex based card.

It's a Vortex 1 card, though. Can't just about all cards play A3D 1.0?

I'd pick the SB0100.

Reply 3 of 26, by Gmlb256

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

+1 for the SBLive! 5.1.

If it was the Aureal Vortex 2, then it's a different story.

VIA C3 Nehemiah 1.2A @ 1.46 GHz | ASUS P2-99 | 256 MB PC133 SDRAM | GeForce3 Ti 200 64 MB | Voodoo2 12 MB | SBLive! | AWE64 | SBPro2 | GUS

Reply 4 of 26, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

disregard

Last edited by Shponglefan on 2023-01-19, 22:35. Edited 2 times in total.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 5 of 26, by Meatball

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Shponglefan wrote on 2023-01-19, 22:12:
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 21:52:
Shponglefan wrote on 2023-01-19, 21:42:

If you're planning on playing A3D supported games, I'd go with the Aureal Vortex based card.

It's a Vortex 1 card, though. Can't just about all cards play A3D 1.0?

I'd pick the SB0100.

Haven't tried with non-A3D cards.

I did use a Vortex 1 based card (Diamond MX200) back in the day on my Windows 98 machine. It always sounded great and the 3D positional audio was convincing in games like Half-Life and Unreal.

The Diamond MX200 is an Analog Devices chip, though. It could play A3D 1.0. Did you mean MX300? This is the Vortex2 and A3D 2.0, yes, would be very much more convincing. The Sound Blaster Live(s) available can play A3D 1.0, EAX 1, 2, and has DirectX 7 support. Plus, the SPDIF connection for digital audio is there.

Last edited by Meatball on 2023-01-19, 22:37. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 6 of 26, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 22:21:

The Diamond MX200 is an Analog Devices chip, though. It could play A3D 1.0. Did you mean MX300? This is the Vortex2 and A3D 2.0, yes, would be very much more convincing. The Sound Blaster Live(s) available can play A3D 1.0, EAX 1, 2, A3D 1.0, and has DirectX 7 support. Plus, the SPDIF connection for digital audio is there.

No, I meant MX200. Though I didn't realize it didn't use a Vortex chip, but rather the Analog Devices chip.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 7 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thanks for the input!
Sadly i don't have half-life anymore, i had the CDs but i gave them away to someone who really wanted them. I'm not sure if any of these games have vortex support, perhaps Max Payne, project nomads and AVP do?

Attachments

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 8 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

also, i've just found these as well, though i'd be surprised if these are any better than the 1st lot:

Attachments

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 9 of 26, by Meatball

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:17:

Thanks for the input!
Sadly i don't have half-life anymore, i had the CDs but i gave them away to someone who really wanted them. I'm not sure if any of these games have vortex support, perhaps Max Payne, project nomads and AVP do?

If you don't have a Vortex 2, it won't matter. If the game supports A3d 1.0, the Sound Blaster Live SB0100 is your best option as it can do this as well, however, I'm betting you'd select EAX 2.0 over A3D 1.0 - but at least it is an option. Looking over your final lot, the SB0100 is still far and away your best option, with the CT4620 the runner up.

The Yamaha might be an interesting, different, choice, but I don't know much about this card - I presume for such a late Windows 9X gaming system you've put together, it's probably not the best option.

Last edited by Meatball on 2023-01-19, 23:31. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 10 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

what are prime the advantages of the sb0100 over the ct4620 other than the 5.1 surround? looks like the potential winner...

Last edited by Vic Zarratt on 2023-01-19, 23:35. Edited 1 time in total.

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 12 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:35:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:30:

what's the advantage of the sb0100 over the ct4620?

4.1 Sound on the CT4620, versus 5.1 on the SB0100. The CT4620 does look more stylish, though.

Yeah those gold connectors sure are sweet looking, is the quality of the sound output any better between these two?

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 13 of 26, by Meatball

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:37:
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:35:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:30:

what's the advantage of the sb0100 over the ct4620?

4.1 Sound on the CT4620, versus 5.1 on the SB0100. The CT4620 does look more stylish, though.

Yeah those gold connectors sure are sweet looking, is the quality of the sound output any better between these two?

This is me, but I'd bet I could not tell the difference (not withstanding directional 4.1 versus 5.1) as far as audio quality. I'd pick the newer card made in 2001, versus 199(8 or 9?), though. Placebo, of course.

Reply 14 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:41:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:37:
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:35:

4.1 Sound on the CT4620, versus 5.1 on the SB0100. The CT4620 does look more stylish, though.

Yeah those gold connectors sure are sweet looking, is the quality of the sound output any better between these two?

This is me, but I'd bet I could not tell the difference (not withstanding directional 4.1 versus 5.1) as far as audio quality. I'd pick the newer card made in 2001, versus 199(8 or 9?), though. Placebo, of course.

Well then, whittling 7 cards down to 2 to choose from is a good deal of help from all you who inputted, so thanks again!
Also while i'm still here - if i can't get my 128bit pci-e nVidia 6200le working, should i fallback on a 64bit pci matrox g450 dual-head or a 64bit pci nVidia geforce 2mx400?

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 15 of 26, by Meatball

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:48:
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:41:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:37:

Yeah those gold connectors sure are sweet looking, is the quality of the sound output any better between these two?

This is me, but I'd bet I could not tell the difference (not withstanding directional 4.1 versus 5.1) as far as audio quality. I'd pick the newer card made in 2001, versus 199(8 or 9?), though. Placebo, of course.

Well then, whittling 7 cards down to 2 to choose from is a good deal of help from all you who inputted, so thanks again!
Also while i'm still here - if i can't get my 128bit pci-e nVidia 6200le working, should i fallback on a 64bit pci matrox g450 dual-head or a 64bit pci nVidia geforce 2mx400?

We'll need someone else with more expertise on the Matrox to chime in. You might get better results opening a new thread. In any case, enjoy!

Reply 16 of 26, by Vic Zarratt

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:54:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:48:
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:41:

This is me, but I'd bet I could not tell the difference (not withstanding directional 4.1 versus 5.1) as far as audio quality. I'd pick the newer card made in 2001, versus 199(8 or 9?), though. Placebo, of course.

Well then, whittling 7 cards down to 2 to choose from is a good deal of help from all you who inputted, so thanks again!
Also while i'm still here - if i can't get my 128bit pci-e nVidia 6200le working, should i fallback on a 64bit pci matrox g450 dual-head or a 64bit pci nVidia geforce 2mx400?

We'll need someone else with more expertise on the Matrox to chime in. You might get better results opening a new thread. In any case, enjoy!

Thanks for the good advise ) Take care

I manage a pot-pourri of video matter...

Reply 17 of 26, by Law212

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Id use the 5.1 card. Its the one I have in my P4 and ive used it since the 90s. or maybe early 2000s I remember i bought it along with a 5.1 creative sound system which I still use to this day. Sounds great IMO.

Reply 18 of 26, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Nothing to really add, agree one of the Live! cards is your best pick here. Although if only using 2.0 speaker or headphones it doesn't really matter which card if you want the extra bling of the gold connectors. (I also doubt you'll notice any difference in sound)

You have an interesting collection of cards though as far as dos is concerned anyway
The Yamaha YMF cards are a popular choice for PCI only systems due to true OPL and great sounding midi thanks to the XG MIDI chip which is comparable to a external unit like the Yamaha MU10 Midi module.

Aureal Vortex 1 card has better dos drivers and OPL emulation compared to Creative cards.

The ALS4000 also has true OPL chip and native dos support.
The ALS4000 PCI Sound Card - PCI SB Compatibility in Newer Systems

The CT4810 is based off the Ensonic ES137x chip it does support its own type of soundfonts (ecw files) but only 3 files exist. 2, 4, 8MB patches, Dos drivers are exactly the same as the Live accept they emulate a SBPro rather then SB16

The Diamond card I don't really know but think it's based on the FM801 chip and seems to have good dos performance.
ForteMedia FM801 FM Synthesis

So you don't have any real trash cards which is always nice to know, but even if you did want dos support I'd still keep things easy and just use the Live! These cards are more if you wanted to build anther PC on the cheap.

Oh and this page is good at telling you if it supports EAX, A3D and what versions.
https://members.optusnet.com.au/kirben/3dsoftware.html

Reply 19 of 26, by zyga64

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Meatball wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:54:
Vic Zarratt wrote on 2023-01-19, 23:48:

Also while i'm still here - if i can't get my 128bit pci-e nVidia 6200le working, should i fallback on a 64bit pci matrox g450 dual-head or a 64bit pci nVidia geforce 2mx400?

We'll need someone else with more expertise on the Matrox to chime in. You might get better results opening a new thread. In any case, enjoy!

I think P4 with PCIe deserves something better than PCI GF2MX. Something like Radeon X550 PCIe (it is really Radeon 9550 for PCIe)

1) VLSI SCAMP /286@20 /4M /CL-GD5422 /CMI8330
2) i420EX /486DX33 /16M /TGUI9440 /GUS+ALS100+MT32PI
3) i430FX /K6-2@400 /64M /Rage Pro PCI /ES1370+YMF718
4) i440BX /P!!!750 /256M /MX440 /SBLive!
5) iB75 /3470s /4G /HD7750 /HDA