Jo22 wrote on 2023-03-18, 21:00:Just asking because of curiosity: Is it a bright black, as seen in those screenshots by any chance? […]
Show full quote
rucuk0kt wrote on 2023-03-18, 18:04:It looks great.
Not suggesting that you should change it, but my crappy CM-5 has some flaws that your image does not have;-) […]
Show full quote
Mr_Blastman wrote on 2023-03-17, 03:37:I continue to tweak for further clarity and proper graininess. […]
Show full quote
I continue to tweak for further clarity and proper graininess.

I think the results are getting closer to a real CM-5, despite the inadequate resolution for proper justice.
It looks great.
Not suggesting that you should change it, but my crappy CM-5 has some flaws that your image does not have;-)
- Black is not black in a lit room
- The shadow mask is slightly visible in black areas
- The CRT and the frame alignment isn't so perfect (slightly angled and much larger border)
- The CRT isn't flat
Just asking because of curiosity: Is it a bright black, as seen in those screenshots by any chance?
https://www.vintagecomputer.net/tandy/cm-5/
I'm not very familiar with this monitor model, hence I looked for photos online. 😅
Yes, my CM-5 looks about the same if the room lighting is on.
The CM-5 in those images is a 25-1043A from may 1988. Mine is a 25-1043B from august 1990, which has just the text 'TANDY CM-5' on the front.
I tried to take some pictures, but failed at creating good ones. I found some nice ones on twitter by Pinot W. Ichwandardi: https://twitter.com/pinot/status/1425872343457533959
The first photo is of a CM-5 like mine. It shows the problem with black. I've attached a small section from the photo:
The attachment cm-5.png is no longer available
After examining the photo, I believe my previous statement 'The shadow mask is slightly visible in black areas' is wrong. The dark areas are showing vertical lines and the lighter lines might be the areas with phosphor.
The image also has an area with black and white checkerboard pattern. The black pixels are much less visible that the white pixels and some pixels are discolored.
Edit: I used a different camera and was able to take a picture of the vertical r/g/b lines. The colours in that picture are off, but that's a camera issue:
The attachment cm5-1.jpg is no longer available
I've added another picture that has more accurate colours but no vertical lines:
The attachment cm5-2.jpg is no longer available
My CM-5 is even worse than I remembered. I counted only 19 phosphor groups per cm in horizontal and vertical direction, so that's about 0.52 mm dot pitch.