Reply 26460 of 29604, by Nexxen
- Rank
- l33t
Kahenraz wrote on 2024-01-15, 22:53:Nexxen wrote on 2024-01-15, 16:26:I was testing a Celeron dual-core E1200, 800/1.6GHz […]
I was testing a Celeron dual-core E1200, 800/1.6GHz
Bios set it @333 and I got it at 2.6GHz
1GHz overclock and temp was 27°C...Way better, at stock speed it's slow even with Xp 🤣
Edit: I pushed it to 3GHz stable @ stock parameters. Did a fast Pi test and it passed... Not my interest to go further down the road with this but it was sure a nice surprise.
Maybe it'll crash with some other stress test, funny nonetheless.My first dual core was one of the first Core 2 CPUs. I bought the cheapest one because it reviewed as easy to overclock. Even as a budget model, it was much faster than my old Athlon 64 3400+, and I used it for years until finally upgrading to a quad core Q9550.
I watched some OC videos on YT and some cpus oc like crazy with almost no effort.
It's almost shamelessly easy... Even C2Q reach nice ocs. With a 95W cpu I wouldn't have thought.
There's a site with all the validated overclocks (can't remember the name now). I'm sure there must be impossible results beyond 6GHz.
If a celeron can reach 8GHz...
Time to bed I guess, otherwise I'l be up until 4 again 🤣
PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K
"One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios