Reply 20 of 28, by Tetrium
- Rank
- l33t++
I'd tend to agree with what some of the others say about it being a matter of personal preference. And this makes sense as most of the features that may uplift any particular board to "best bx board in the world"-status is down to personal preferences. I would argue that one that everybody can agree on, is that the board should work flawlessly when it comes to stability (which rules out obvious defects and poor board manufacture), but bx is almost by definition stable. So I reckon not many boards would actually drop off due to this.
For one VIA compatibility will perhaps be essential, but for the next person it may be overclockability.
I've never build a lot of complete full Slot 1 systems for my hobby, mostly because I had already used my P2B for so long that I wanted to try out other boards (with sockets and stuff! 😁 ) ((and because I already worked with a lot of Slot 1 boards elsewhere)), but I did end up liking the 6BTM for the same reasons I ended up liking the (non Slot-1 board) A7V-133: I happened to end up with a whole batch of them so I just had to try them.
6BTM just grew on me, but is it the best?
I wouldn't necessarily need P2B-F nor MS-6168 because bx boards usually come with lots of slots and there's a ton of expansion cards to choose from. So for me such a board would be a nice oddity, but it would also mean there's more that can make the board go kaput.
Btw I think I would not pick P2B as best board if only because (for some reason) my P2B has DIMM slots that make it very hard to insert memory modules into them, it seemed really very stiff (yes I did put in the SDRAMs correctly xD 😜 ).