VOGONS


First post, by DosFreak

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/14161/1

Conclusions What can I say? The picture isn't terribly rosy. In terms of performance, what we saw out of three-way SLI was more […]
Show full quote

Conclusions
What can I say? The picture isn't terribly rosy. In terms of performance, what we saw out of three-way SLI was more or less what we expected: that you'll need a 2560x1600 display in order to really realize the benefits of three GPUs. Even then, in none of the games we tested did we see a case where going from two cards to three made a real difference in terms of playability. (Going from 80 FPS to 95 FPS doesn't count.) The closest we came to that may have been Crysis, but that game seems to have its own performance scaling problems—at least at the "high" and "very high" settings—that involve factors other than the graphics subsystem alone. Perhaps, in some games, turning up antialiasing levels to 8X or 16X will help tease out some of the benefits of having a third GPU. That wasn't the case when we tried it in Half-Life 2: Episode Two, however.

Subjectively, playing games on a three-way rig wasn't especially exciting, either. The main difference I noticed was the noise emanating from the system, a reality we quantified with our power, noise, and temperature measurements. Three-way SLI truly is an extreme solution, and it comes with all of the drawbacks that such things tend to have. I'm sure it's possible with careful component selection, artful thermal design, and probably some form of water cooling to make a three-way SLI system that isn't especially loud. But it will draw lots of power and expend it into the room as heat, almost inescapably.

Personally, I don't think it's worth bothering, and I haven't even mentioned the expense involved yet. Two GeForce 8800 GTs should be up to the task of driving a 30" wide-aspect display reasonably well in most games, and a pair of those costs less than a single 8800 Ultra. If that's not enough for you, in my view, the very best config Nvidia has to offer right now is a pair of GeForce 8800 GTS 512s. This card is, like the 8800 GT, based on the new G92 GPU. As a result, the GTS 512 has H.264 decode acceleration for HD video playback, and it has more texture filtering and shader arithmetic power than the 8800 Ultra.

Having said all of that, I'm still glad that three-way SLI exists, simply because it expands the horizons a little bit. In fact, I'd like to see more-than-two-way setups with G92 GPUs become available soon, since they'd be more attractive overall. So long as a system like this is possible, somebody out there is going to be looking for ways to take full advantage of it. Crytek seems to be close. If and when they get there, it should be a glorious sight to behold.

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Make your games work offline

Reply 1 of 2, by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The only thing that makes me interested on SLI is SLI AA, but such feature is nowhere mentioned in 3-way SLI review.

Never thought this thread would be that long, but now, for something different.....
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman.

Reply 2 of 2, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

What I want to know is, where are did all the promises for powerful but more energy-efficient GPUs go? Is it really too much of a pipe dream to want to play something like BioShock or Crysis at 720p60 with all visual effects enabled and 4×AA for under 40W? When GPUs require three separate 12V power sources to get 200-300W of power, and you're combining THREE of them, something has gone very very wrong, IMO. At least, I'm rather happy with the efficiency of the X1600 in my MacBook Pro -- the entire system has a total maximum power usage of just 65W. I wonder how much energy and money is wasted by these multi-GPU SLI monstrosities...

Yes, it’s my fault.