First post, by Verdorie1
- Rank
- Newbie
I upgraded from a Gainward 3DFX Voodoo 4MB to a Diamond Monster 3D 3DFX Voodoo 4MB because I found one for a decent price.
So I wonder how much better it performed so I did some tests in Quake with Timedemo 1.
My PC specs are:
Intel Pentium MMX 233 with the PCI bus running at 75MHz for a total of 262.5MHz
64MB SD-RAM PC66
Intel 430HX chipset
Sound Blaster AWE64 CT4500
Matrox Millennium II PCI
The Gainward Voodoo seems to run at 45MHz by default. I managed to overclock it to a stable 49MHz, at 50MHz it crashes ever so often.
The Diamond Monster Voodoo has a performance toggle. The "Nominal performance with improved compatibility" setting runs at 50MHz and the "Maximal performance with reduced compatibility" setting runs at 57MHz.
In Quake's timedemo 1 the Gainward gets 27.1fps on average and at 49MHz it gets 32.5fps, quite the difference for just a 4MHz clock speed difference.
Th Diamond Monster however is in a league of its own. At 50MHz it gets 33.1fps and at 57MHz a whopping 37.8fps.
I never expected the card to perform this well with a Pentium MMX.
I'm pretty pleased with how it currently performs for games between 1995 and early 1998, in some of the more demanding DOS titles in 640x480 like Blood or Shadow Warrior the performance isn't quite as good as I would like but I don't think I can squeeze more out of this machine besides a faster Tillamook cpu or something like that.
MS-DOS | 486DX4 | Tseng ET4000/W32i VLB | SB AWE64
Win 95 | PMMX 233 | Matrox Millennium II | Diamond 3D Voodoo 4MB | SB AWE64
Win 98 | PIII 600 SL1 | Voodoo 3 3000 | SB AWE64
Win XP | P4 3.0 | 6800GT | SB Audigy 2
Win Vista | Q9550 | GTX285 | SB Audigy 4