Reply 20 of 24, by lordmogul
- Rank
- Newbie
I'd say highly variable.
The first question is: What kind of games and at what settings and resolution.
The second question is: Which integrated graphics.
Most would probably think "Integrated? So those shoddy Intel ones?" And while that might be a good start, even they can vary a lot.
- Starting at the the i754 that was in the i815 chipset and only supports DirectX 6 fully (vertex shader 3.0 support in software, but no support for pixel shader whatsover)
- Then the GMA series, some of which add software PS 2.0 to the still existing software VS 3.0 (So they would be DX 9.0 capable on a theoretical level, but not 9.0c) There should be i900G/i915G boards with GMA900.
- And then the fully SM3 (GMA X3000), and SM4 (GMA X3500, 4500, X4500, X4500HD) supporting chips in the 30 and 40 series chipsets (Core 2 era), which already fall out of Win 9x support.
ATi and AMD have this to offer:
- There is the Radeon 300 series, based on the original Radeon/Radeon 7000, the fastest integrated one is basically a Radeon VE/Radeon 7000, with full Direct3D 7 and OpenGL 1.3 support
- The Radeon 9000 iGPUs, based on the Radeon 9200 chips with cut down TMUs and ROPs, but at a higher clock. Full D3D 8.1 and OpenGL 1.4 support.
- Then the Radeon Xpress X200/X1000/X1150, which are like a Radeon 9550/9600, but again with cut down TMUs and ROPs. D3D 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0 support.
- The Radeon Xpress X1200/X1250/2100, which are also like a 9550/9600, but this time in full.
nVidia brings this to the table:
- nForce 220-D and 415-D come with a Geforce 2 MX integrated. So both will give DirectX 7.0 and OpenGL 1.2 (Probably around 20% slower than a full GF2 MX and quite similar to an MX200) (Socket A)
- nForce 2 IGP comes with a Geforce 4 MX integrated. There is a 200 MHz version, pair that with dual channel RAM and it's pretty much a MX440 and runs past the MX420 and MX440 SE) (Socket A)
- nvidia offers 9x drivers for nForce 400, and those come with a Geforce 6100 or 6150, which means full DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.1 support. At about half the performance of a full Geforce 6200 (So around Ti 4200 or FX 5200 performance) (Sockets 754, 939, AM2)
And for the other outliers:
- SiS 540, with SiS 300 graphics: DX 6.0, OpenGL 1.1 (Socket 7)
- SiS 630/730, with SiS 305 graphics: DX 6.0, OpenGL 1.1 (Slot 1, Socket 370, Slot A, Socket A)
- SiS 650/740, with SiS 315 graphics: DX 6.0, OpenGL 1.1 ( Socket 423, Socket 478,Socket A)
- SiS Mirage 1: DX 7.0 (but without T&L), OpenGL 1.3 (Socket A, Socket 775)
- SiS Mirage 2: DX 8.1, OpenGL 1.4 (Socket 754, Socket 939)
- SiS Mirage 3: DX 9.0; OpenGL 1.5 (Socket 775)
- VIA has a bunch of chipsets with Trident Blade 3D, S3 Savage4 and UniChrome based graphics. (Socket 8, Slot 1, Socket 370, Slot A and Socket A)
- ALi has the ALADDiN TNT, which comes with a Riva TNT2, so DirectX 6 and OpenGL 1.2 support. (SLot 1/Socket 370)
=|================================|=
Short overview of supported APIs:
For DX6:
- Intel up to GMA900
- ALADDiN TNT/Riva TNT2
- SiS303/315 graphics (on SiS 540, 630, 650, 730, 740 chipsets)
For DX7:
Radeon 300
- nForce 220-D/415-D
- nForce 2 IGP
- SiS Mirage 1 (no T&L!!!)
For DX8:
- Radeon 9000/9100/9100 Pro
- SiS Mirage 2
For DX9 (SM2):
- Radeon Xpress X200/X1000/X1150
- Radeon Xpress X1200/X1250/2100
- SiS Mirage 3
For DX9.0c (SM3):
- nForce 410/nForce 430
OpenGL 1.1:
- Intel 752/i754
- SiS303/315 graphics (on SiS 540, 630, 650, 730, 740 chipsets)
OpenGL 1.2:
- nForce 220-D/415-D
- ALADDiN TNT/Riva TNT2
OpenGL 1.3:
- SiS Mirage 1
OpenGL 1.4:
- Radeon 9000/9100/9100 Pro
- GMA900/GMA950
OpenGL 1.5:
- SiS Mirage 3
OpenGL 2.0:
- Radeon Xpress X200/X1000/X1150
- Radeon Xpress X1200/X1250/2100
OpenGL 2.1:
- nForce 410/nForce 430
=|================================|=
What does that mean for 9x gaming on integrated graphics?
Should be quite possible.
- If a Riva TNT is fast enough, absolutely. There are plenty of integrated options with sufficient compatibility and performance.
- If a Geforce 4 MX or Radeon 8500/9200 is enough for a game, then yes. Quite some that will deliver that level of performance of better.
- The fastest with support for the most games would probably an nForce 430 with Geforce 6150.
From what I can find from old tests is around 20-22 FPS in Far Cry, 29-33 FPS in Half Life 2 and around 75 FPS in Painkiller, all in 800x600. Dropping to 640x480 will give almost 50 fps in Far Cry.
So games around 2003-04, the time of release did run. Surprisingly good even if you manage expectations.
I'd say that is plenty for Windows 98, I doubt anyone would use that to play Oblivion or F.E.A.R anyway. But if you drop the settings far enough, even Half Life 2 should be "playable" enough 😀
P3 933EB @1035 (7x148) | CUSL2-C | GF3Ti200 | 256M PC133cl3 @148cl3 | 98SE & XP Pro SP3
X5460 @4.1 (9x456) | P35-DS3R | GTX660Ti | 8G DDR2-800cl5 @912cl6 | XP Pro SP3 & 7 SP1
3570K @4.4 GHz | Z77-D3H | GTX1060 | 16G DDR3-1600cl9 @2133cl12 | 7 SP1