Reply 40 of 49, by rmay635703
- Rank
- Oldbie
The Serpent Rider wrote on 2024-09-30, 22:57:rmay635703 wrote on 2024-09-29, 02:37:Ideally 2048x1536 Native resolution (1280 is too low for modern use, 1600x1200 is barely adequate)
2048x1536 is bad for scaling.
Bad but still better than 1280x1024
Next step up is 2560x1920 which scales beautifully to all resolutions but good luck with that, might as well get my dream 4k 4:3 panel
Scaling and jank is virtually solved as Modern LCDs use subpixels and have very minimal issues with non-integer scaling, especially on an analog input at a lower resolution.
I run terrible wrong resolutions into my semi modern screens and the classic, blur, blocks and janky text are nearly undetectable .
You place a 2016+ screen next to a 2004 and down era LCD with the same resolution panel driving a non-integer resolution and the differences in image quality and artifacts are immense.
As for 25” being “too big” I agree my desk really doesn’t work with more than a 23” 16:9 but 4:3 can actually provide a lot more screen real estate on a smaller desk and in the US at least it’s barely possible to find a screen smaller than 25” and outside strange Chinese portables the screens under that size are almost all unusable resolutions and TV sets.
Also worth noting a good custom 25” 4:3 screen would possibly have enough demand to get cost down because of all the wierd applications not only in the arcade but also in industry and military/.gov that use that size. These entities would then have a 3rd option that isn’t trash the cabinet
I’ve been trying to source a smaller high quality lcd without an immense investment for a while and all the screens on the shelf
they are all either ancient tech or total garbage