nd22 wrote on 2025-02-06, 09:54:
Athlon 1400C + 2*1gb DDR + gf3 ti 500 + Abit KG7-raid + HDD + DVD = 30A required on the 5V rail + 180W combined on the 3.3V+5V rail.
Hmmmm???? How are you getting those numbers?
That Athlon CPU is 72W TDP. The GF3 TI500, judging by the heatsink size is 15 Watts... maybe 20 Watts tops. So that gives a total of less than 100 Watts... but let's round it up to 100 for fun. Assuming all of this comes from the 5V rail (though I'm not 100% sure if the TI500 actually pulled its GPU power from 3.3V or 5V rail, but whatever, let's ignore this little detail), that's still 20 Amps at the most, and with a bit of room to spare. An HDD + DVD ain't gonna add up another 10 Amps. So where you get the 30 Amp requirement, I'm not sure. If it's from some online calculator, take it with a spoonful of salt... maybe even an entire glass.
I always do my own calculations based on the CPU and GPU TDP (and sometimes mobo chipset TDP, if it's a more power-hungry one.) Also, unless I go total overboard with the HDDs and ODDs (and only if I plan to use them all at the same time) do I consider adding all of their power requirements to the total. For the most part, 1 HDD will draw about 500 mA from the 5V rail and about just as much from the 12V rail when up and running. During spin-up, the 12V rail current can be high (up to 2 Amps), but that isn't of too much concern with one or two HDDs.
BTW, I also NEVER trust the label on the "no-name" PSU manufacturers. Instead, I open them and check the part numbers of all of the rectifiers. This gives me a much better idea of what the PSU is capable of on each rail. A lot of times, the cheapo PSUs will write sky-high numbers for the 3.3V and 5V rails, which is not true at all. Take the L&C B300ATX PSU mentioned in the beginning of this thread. I just got one like it last week in a retro PC I picked up for next to nothing. Both the 3.3V and 5V rail promise close to 30 Amps each. Yet, get this: the rectifiers in this PSU for the 3.3V and 5V rail are only 10 Amp and 16 Amp parts! 🤣 So the label is a complete lie.
In regards to these Segotep PSUs everyone has been talking about here in the last few pages - I wouldn't trust the label on those either. FWIW, I bought a used PC for my nephew last summer, and it came with one of these Segotep PSUs - model GTR550, for anyone that cares. Of course I opened it for inspection (and cleaning) and I have to say, I wasn't that impressed... though I can't say it's a terrible PSU either. Basically, it was exactly what was popular 25 years ago - an ancient half-bridge group-regulated design and probably the same mediocre efficiency too. Only few things that distinguished it from the cheapo PSUs back in the day: it had complete input and output filtering... though cap-wise, it was full of "no-name" cap brands I didn't recognize, so I doubt it will last too long. Apart from that, it wasn't built too badly - 13009 NPN BJTs in TO-220 case (so probably going to act like "better made" 13007's) and decent output rectifier setup for the 12V rail (probably to cater to modern 12V-based systems). The rectifiers for the 3.3V and 5V rail were more or less rated for what the label promised, but I wouldn't suggest anyone to push it that high on those rails... which going back to the topic at hand here (PSUs with strong 5V rails), I wouldn't say I recommend this Segotep PSU for a 5V-heavy setup.
Nemo1985 wrote on 2025-02-01, 23:01:
Unlucky I tried the tagan and it did a bang probably it didn't like being in a basement for 10 years...
Probably needed a recapping.
From what I remember, those higher-end Tagans were actually pretty good PSUs, but just riddled with crap caps... which sitting for 10 years probably got even worse over time. Likely the 5VSB circuit blew. If it was mine, I would have opened it before powering it on (it's actually a rule for anything I get used - everything must be opened and inspected first before being plugged in.)
CharlieFoxtrot wrote on 2025-02-06, 10:42:
bloodem wrote on 2025-02-06, 10:08:
Yeah, but at that point, might as well just hunt for a good NOS PSU from back in the day: https://www.anandtech.com/show/1124/1
If you're patient & lucky, you can still find these new, sealed, for less than $30, which is definitely worth it.
NOS PSU that is something like two decades or more old isn't reliable, capacitors go bad unused too. I have one vintage NOS PSU incoming and I won't use that on any of my systems until I've recapped it.
On that note, I only use vintage PSUs with these 5V heavy setups as they are still easily available and are cheap, I just recap the secondary side by default. I find using modern beefy PSUs a waste with these systems and even if you have nominally enough power on 5V and 3.3V rails, group regulated PSUs may still struggle when there is little load on 12V as they were designed to provide most power on 12V instead of 5V/3.3V.
+1
BTW, only time a NOS PSU might be OK to use as-is is if came with Japanese capacitors originally. Some of the Dell and HP OEM PSU from the Pentium II and 3 era were built like that. Only problem is, some of these were proprietary.
bloodem wrote on 2025-02-07, 07:04:
Anyone with extensive experience in electronics repair will likely agree with me that faulty capacitors are the exception rather than the norm - even in 50+ year old devices.
I'd say that depends a lot on the specific device we are talking about.
Old Japanese caps tend to have pretty good record for the most part and indeed don't age too badly at all. For example, I was servicing my dad's Sony stereo amplifier from the late 70's, and most of the large caps were well within spec, despite its age (the amp was used regularly all these years, though... so it wasn't sitting without use.) At the same time, I've ran into quite a few Nichicon PR series with electrolyte leaking from the bungs (known defect with age for this series.)
That said, most non-OEM PSUs from the 90's and onwards rarely used Japanese caps. Instead, they used "2nd tier" Taiwanese caps like Teapo, CapXon, Ltec, and etc... which indeed weren't all too terrible... but then some really were. The problem with many of the "2nd tier" caps is that you never know whether a particular batch will last or not. And then there's the application too. For example, the CWT-built Antec PSUs with Fuhjyyu capacitors used to fail A TON... yet, I've ran into other PSU manufacturers that used Fuhjyyu and didn't really have any problems. So clearly the design of the PSU matters too.
But either way, I think we can all agree here that a 20 YO... or even a 15 YO NOS PSU shouldn't be trusted blindly and just put into a system without any regards.
At the same time, buying a new PSU that's not really designed for a heavy 5V-load is also not a great choice. This is why I too support the idea of getting older PSU and encourage people to recap them. It's not too hard of a process (especially after you do a few... save for some of the really packed "double-deckers" 🤣 - those are always slow to work on).
bloodem wrote on 2025-02-07, 07:04:
Unfortunately, the capacitor plague instilled a widespread misconception that capacitors have inherently short lifespans, whereas, before that time, capacitor failure was rarely a primary concern.
That's indeed true to an extent. I've seen a lot of people worry or toss their cap stock in the bin when it's sat for more than 5 years... which is a real shame, since most capacitors don't age that badly sitting on the shelf, unless they were garbage quality to begin with. At this point, I have some caps in my stock that I got 15+ years ago from Digikey/Mouser. So far, all of them have been OK, despite being on the shelf for so long. I do reform them before installing them in a device, of course - just in case. I think I didn't reform them only a few times, where I put them in devices for my own use where I didn't really care that much and just YOLO-repaired them. 😁