StriderTR wrote on 2025-03-26, 16:45:
Same here.
Too expensive and too limited/closed up.
This is the same reason I hate modern phones and don't really care what I get, since I barely use it... but that's a different topic.
gerry wrote on 2025-03-28, 10:52:
ah yes, gamer headphones, gamer mouse, gamer etc
Agreed.
Most gamer gear is quite terrible.
I got a pair of Steelseries wireless headphones for free (from Craigslist) because they were broken - one driver just went open-circuit randomly and that was that. Original owner told me they were just weeks past the warranty and SteelSeries literally told him "not my problem anymor".
From what I could hear from the other (working driver) side, I can't say these are worth the price tag - battery is huge but doesn't really last, the frequency response is... meh... and overall, Senheiser and many others offer superior performance and quality at lower prices.
So I take a hard pass on anything labeled "gamer" or "gaming".
In regards to office chairs, I got my first "nice" office chair off of Craigslist for free over a decade ago - a high-back "executive" type office chair. The metal base had a crack in it... which wasn't too much of an issue with me, since I'm a pretty light guy. A few rungs of steel wire secured it well enough, and it's still holding up. Even the fake / pleather covering is still OK... though probably worth mentioning that I do use it with a throw cover on top (I don't like leather or pleather, because they feel cold in the winter and sweaty in the summer.) Apart from that, it's very comfortable and can sit on it all day without getting back pain. Even now, after 10 years of use, it's still pretty comfortable, despite the bottom cushion not being in top shape anymore (to say the least - it's sunk in the middle quite a bit.)
subhuman@xgtx wrote on 2025-03-28, 13:12:
RGB peripherals and hardware. Imagine paying an extra 20 to 50 dollars (clearly over that for a motherboard) for something that adds no functionality and to top it up, rather makes your pc look either like a toy or a brothel.
Yup, I too have a strong dislike for just about anything RGB. "Rainbow barf", as some call it, is the more accurate term, IMO.
digger wrote on 2025-03-28, 10:59:
IBM Deskstar hard drives.
People started calling them "Death stars" for a reason. 💀
According to Wikipedia, it was only the 75GXP series that had the infamously high failure rates. But that was enough to kill IBM's reputation on the computer storage market.
Yes, the 75GXP series were supposed to be the most problematic ones, but even some of their other series were also somewhat affected. That said, I find it ironic how often people mention these drives as failure-prone, yet there's not as much noise about certain other manufacturers and series that were also known to have lots of problems (e.g. WD "Green" series, WD800xx series, Seagate 7200.12, and etc.) FWIW, I've had far more problems with Western Digital drives just randomly diying one day when they worked fine and had normal SMART readings the previous day - most of them just doing the "click of death", and two with dead motor controllers. At least with Seagate, the most problematic ones just developed bad sectors and became too slow, but still allowed me to back them up.
lti wrote on 2025-03-30, 18:57:
What's weird is that almost all of the hard drives I've had fail were Toshiba drives. I've seen every brand fail, but I've only seen three Toshiba drives last longer than two years (which was coincidentally their warranty period). One of those was a 3.5" drive (former Hitachi, so it might count as a Deathstar) that failed after five years by failing to spin back up after a power cycle. I saw tons of failed Toshiba 2.5" drives, and they almost all failed by suddenly developing thousands of bad sectors and making Windows switch to PIO mode. Part of that could be caused by handling, but some of those were my own drives or in laptops that were never moved while powered on (lots of laptops are treated as desktops). One of the Toshiba drives I bought (factory-installed drive in a laptop) had a head crash while sitting stationary on my desk as I was studying for a test in college.
Early Toshiba HDDs were indeed absolutely awful, especially the 2.5" drives. FWIW, many PS3 consoles used these, and I can't tell you how many I have seen failed. These ranged anywhere from 80 to 320 GB capacities. BUT... it seems that Toshiba recovered from this, eventually. At one of my workplaces, a toll road, many of the toll controllers (custom mini industrial PCs) used Toshiba 320 GB 2.5" HDDs, and I didn't see a single failure from these. I even got a few for myself (from retired equipment that was destined for scrap), including the one in the laptop I'm typing from right now, and so far all have been rock-solid (knock on wood.) But the older ones that failed were exactly like lti described - just started developing bad sectors everywhere and eventually died. I only managed to "save" one by seeing where the bad sectors are (with a surface scan) and then mapped them out into their own separate partitions. The drive ended up with 5 partitions total - 3 good and 2 bad in between them. Works well enough for occasional backups (or rather 2nd backups), ironically.