Reply 56600 of 56684, by BitWrangler
- Rank
- l33t++
The thrifts haven't had a lot in the past few months, so I guess I get overexcited and buy marginal shit when it turns up. Today found an additional IDE HDD removable caddy, and three "mystery bags" at $5 CDN each, well not too much of a mystery since they were transparent....
So turned out to have 7 2.5" SATA drives, 60, 120, 2x250, 3x320. I guess the 60 and 120 are a little meh but I still find the other sizes useful for juggling stuff around and arranging archives... also I think I still have an XP laptop with only a 120 so it can have a 320 now.
RAM, shovelfuls of RAM, heh, like I needed any more, seem to go for the RAM lots a lot and end up with 10% I can actually use... well surprise surprise, only some of it is useful to me, 64MB SDR SODIMM, good size for the 9x laptops, one of the DDR SODIMMs might be a biggie, 16 chip, gotta look it up for sure but think it's 1GB. The other 256 is prolly gonna sit unless something dies. Then the PC2 SODIMM are 512s and 1GBs which I already had scads of, oh well, will be SMD donors I guess. The desktop stuff, got some useable size SD 128 and 256s, two 256 DDR which I would throw in the shoebox full but they're 400mhz which miiiight find them a purpose. The 512s could still be useful. Nothing much good in the PC2s, 256, 512, 1GB... though the 1GB may find a seat in an early DDR2 board that take 3.5GB for XP/Vista with 4 slots. Then two DDR3 4GB which are useful still, for retro-ish and still modern useable stuff.
Anyhooooo, all in, I think I got 15 things I might use, so at a buck a thing it ain't too bad.
Heh, I might be making a Network Agglomerated Random Storage box with some of those drives in, got that 12 port atom board and laptop drives use little power so connect all the things 🤣
Edit: I'm a doorknob that 120GB travelstar is a PATA drive, I thought I saw PATA in store, then unpacked and couldn't see it and thought I imagined it, then look at the pic again and it's right there you schmuck. So that is actually nicer than having a 120GB SATA because of early noughts machines. Would have been nice if the 60GB was a PATA too though, even "in the day" I thought it was pretty weaksauce that they made SATA under 160GB or so, since common PATA sizes were "up there" by the time motherboards actually had SATA and "backfilling" all those small drive sizes seemed stupid.
Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.