VOGONS


First post, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello, I'm an occasional lurker, and a first time poster! This is my very first build thread on VOGONS and I hope you will enjoy reading it.

The build I'm here to showcase is my latest creation that I call "Watchtower". It is a 2012-era Ivy Bridge system that I built for older games and general Windows 7/XP usage. It also happens to be my very first build! Most of my PCs have been either built by others or purchased pre-assembled and used, so I used this build as a good way to practice PC building.

Here are the current specifications:

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-3770K
  • Cooler: Noctua NH-D14
  • Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77
  • RAM: Corsair Vengeance LP 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3-1600 CL10
  • GPU: GIGABYTE GTX 680 WindForce 3X OC 2GB
  • Storage: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD & WD Caviar Black 2TB HDD (Windows 7), GB0250EAFYK HP Enterprise Drive (Windows XP)
  • Case: Fractal Design Define R4 Black Pearl
  • Power Supply: Corsair TX850V2
  • Sound Card: Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium
  • Optical Drive: LG GH24NSC0 24x Super Multi DVD-RAM
The attachment outside.jpg is no longer available
The attachment inside.jpg is no longer available

(pardon the cable management and dust, I plan to fix it when I get the free time and will)

Introduction

I'd like to give a bit of a dive into how the build came to be and its intentions and purposes before I dive into the technical nitty-gritty.

Previously, my alternative PC for retro purposes was an old Athlon II X3 system that ran Windows XP. While there were no problems with it, other than it sometimes being a bit slow for certain applications, I started thinking about building something more powerful that would still run XP and maybe also run Windows 7. The usage of Windows 7 would be for both the OS itself, and the games that would be appropriate for it. And originally, an XP/7 dualboot was the only motivation for this build. But as I was planning out the parts more and more, I had another idea as to where to go with it.

I think it is important to establish that I grew up in a different era of PC gaming and PCs in general, much later than the generally discussed eras on this forum. I have quite fond memories (wouldn't call it nostalgia, at least not yet 😉) of the early 2010s, and particularly the year 2012. Why? While it seemingly isn't anything special on the surface, it is a year I hold a strong sentiment for when it comes to PC gaming and my early gaming years.

So I gave this build another purpose: Being a top-of-the-line and period-correct 2012 gaming PC.

While it may not sound as impressive or as retro as most of the other builds on the forum, I personally view it as an interesting concept to take on for a build. I always have fondness and a lot of respect for period-correct builds that people create in the modern day, so I wanted to create something similar, but for a PC gaming era I have more personal interest in revisiting. It having Windows XP as a secondary OS may be viewed as bogging down its "omega gaming PC of the year" status, but ultimately I believe it gives me greater compatibility for games released before 2008-2009, and I think they fit Windows XP better than Windows 7 (even if 7 is perfectly capable of running the games). I should also note that I am not going absolutely balls to the wall with every single part (like a Xeon or an LGA2011 CPU or what have you). I'm aiming for a pretty realistic consumer gaming build for the year its based on, but still with very high-end components.

This project involved a lot of research for me, having to look up 2012 buyer's guides, old Anandtech articles and reviews, PCPartPicker completed builds, and old forum threads. It was a pretty fun ride that resulted in a sick build, and I'd love to do something like that again for an older time period if I ever got in the mood for it!

Parts

I'd like to give some more info about some of the parts used in the system.

CPU: There was no doubt in my mind that I had to go for the i7-3770K for top-dog gaming performance of the time. While I haven't overclocked it yet, it is something I'm considering, as the CPU, cooler and motherboard should be fairly capable for it. I have also thought about potentially delidding it for lower temperatures, but it is not something I'm comfortable with or capable of doing at the moment.

Cooler: While maybe not the newest at the time, the NH-D14 was a very well-regarded cooler, and the absolute top-end for air-cooling for the time, as far as I'm concerned. (And it's still a great air cooler today, even if discontinued!) I considered liquid cooling, but getting a 13 year old AIO doesn't bode well for reliability, and I'm unsure if those old models from back then are still manufactured at all. Plus, I've always personally preferred air cooling's simplicity. Nevertheless, the Noctua is a very fitting choice for this build, and it performs wonderfully. It should give me plenty of overclocking headroom in the future!

Motherboard: Originally, I was going to use whatever motherboard I could find that had a 3770K in it already, but as all the good bundles I cound find locally dried up, I focused on finding a specific one. And for the intentions and purposes of this build, the SABERTOOTH Z77 was absolutely perfect. It was a very well-regarded Z77 motherboard back in the day from what I can tell, and the aesthetics and functionality drew me to it like a moth to a flame. I just had to have it for this build.

RAM: I was originally going to use a different Corsair set of 4x4GB sticks, but they would be incompatible with the cooler due to clearance, so I opted for a different set of low profile Corsair memory. While arguably not the fastest speed or latency at the time, it is still plenty fast, a great choice for the build, and the capacity would still be more than enough for the time.

GPU: Considering Nvidia's equal or slightly better amount of performance around this time over most of AMD's offerings, and my preference for more efficient cards, the obvious choice for the GPU was the GTX 680. I was lucky enough to find this pretty good Gigabyte model locally for super cheap, and it works very well for the games I run on it. I considered maybe using an improved 4GB variant instead, but I didn't think it would be worth the money and time to hunt one down, and 2GB of VRAM is plenty for this era of games and older at 1080p. I'm a bit wary of the 690 and dual-GPUs in general, so I decided not to consider it as a potential upgrade, nor did I think SLI would be worth the time and money to set up due to limited support. It is something I'd love to experiment with however, if I were to get a second compatible 680.

Storage: The 840 Pro was regarded as a very good SSD when it came out, so I opted to grab it as the Windows 7 system drive. I feel like I'm taking a bit of a risk, considering it's a used drive. I have committed to the period-correctness as much as I can at this point however, and I'm sure it'll be fine for now, as Samsung drives are known to be pretty reliable. Plus, I don't plan to hold anything sensitive or valuable on this drive, so I can always replace it if it fails at any point with no real repercussions. I originally considered a pure 500GB SSD setup for Win 7 for both the OS and games, but it was a much less realistic storage setup than SSD+HDD at the time, as the 500GB version of the system drive alone retailed for 600 dollars! The HDD should also give me plenty of space for games and whatever other stuff I want to put on there. Maybe not the most HDD storage in the world at the time, but 2TB is still a sizeable amount for the time, and it'll be more than enough for all the games I'd want to run on this PC. The smaller hard drive on the other hand is solely for Windows XP usage, as I was not in the mood to risk and mess with SSDs on XP, so I went with it as a safer storage option, and for proper self-containment. Doing this also lets me avoid MBR/GPT shenanigans on any of my main drives, which is much appreciated.

Case: The Define R series of cases was a pretty popular choice in this period from what I can gather, so getting the latest at the time R4 model was a good choice. It's a great case with plenty of room for building and it looks incredibly stylish too! The used example I got had some parts missing, but I was able to make due with other spare parts I obtained, such as replacement feet and HDD screws.

Power Supply: The TX850V2 was a pretty solid choice for a high-end system back then, and I was able to find one locally for a good price, so I snapped it up for this build. The non-modularity made it a bit of a cable mess, but I managed just fine, and it is running very well in the system. Ironically, it has a higher wattage than the PSU in my main rig! And it should give me plenty of headroom for SLI, should I ever want to mess around with that in the future.

Sound Card: The X-Fi Titanium was intended and used for my previous XP PC, but I put it in this system instead for both higher quality audio output, and X-Fi compatibility under XP. While X-Fi also works with certain games under 7, the DirectSound shenanigans I read about make it a better fit for XP in my opinion. It may be viewed as pretty old at the time, but I don't find it to be super out-of-place for the build. That being said, I do think a Sound Blaster Z-Series card would be a pretty interesting part to put in and mess around with.

Optical Drive: The optical drive was not a part that I thought needed much deliberation, so I just use the one that came pre-installed in the case. It supports DVD-RAM and M-DISCs, which I find interesting and amusing.

Software & Setup

As previously mentioned, the machine runs both Windows 7 & XP, with the latter mostly for older games and software that are better suited for that OS. I originally wanted to have a proper boot menu that let me pick between them on boot, but due to UEFI shenanigans on 7, I could not get it set up for love nor money. So I settled on simply choosing the XP HDD in the Boot Override menu in the BIOS, which works well enough. To install XP, I had to temporarily set the SATA mode to IDE and install the proper AHCI driver, but after that it was all smooth sailing with Legacy Update and whatnot. I was going to install XP first originally, but I didn't have the parts necessary to properly install it, so I did 7 first. This meant I had to fix the bootloader with a Windows 7 install USB after installing XP, but it wasn't anything complicated or troublesome. I still want a proper boot menu solution though, so if anyone has a solution to my UEFI problem or a good boot menu alternative, please let me know!

I didn't have any real goal with the XP install other than to get all the old games going, but for Windows 7, I had an additional goal of getting it period correct to the era as well. As a compromise from all my options available, I chose mid-2013 as a sweet spot for all the old game versions and software themes to be based on. I think I nailed it pretty well, all things considered. Desktop pictures for both OSes (as of July 9th) below.

The attachment win7.jpg is no longer available
The attachment xp.jpg is no longer available

In terms of stuff like drivers or general GPU usage info, I chose driver 352.86 for XP (proper GPU scaling options and monitor recognition) and 441.66 for 7 (better compatibility with Kepler GPUs), as well as the latest Daniel_K X-Fi drivers for my X-Fi Titanium under both OSes. For 4:3 games under XP, I chose the Do Not Scale option with a 1440x1080 resolution selected in-game. The result is sharp visuals with the proper aspect ratio. Example pic below.

The attachment vc.jpg is no longer available

For peripherals, I currently have a generic cheapo gaming keyboard and mouse set (I seek to change them at a later point) and a period-correct 1080p monitor that I luckily found at a thrift store! I do not have any speakers and I don't use headphones, so all the audio as of now is coming out of the monitor. Not the greatest sound quality, but until I find decent speakers from the time, I consider it to be the most comfortable option while still being reasonably adequate to me.

Ultimately, most of my time is spent on the Windows 7 end, and I absolutely love it! Watching older videos, listening to music, and playing games while doing either of those has been incredibly cozy, and the period-correct theming and games add to it a lot. 😀 The XP end has also been incredibly fun to tinker with in terms of games and software, even with the added inconvenience of having to boot override into it every time.

The Future

What could potentially be next for the build?

  • Overclocking would definitely be an interesting avenue to explore for slightly more performance, but I am not good at it at all, 🤣. I'm definitely planning to do it very soon, though.
  • Triple-booting Win 10/7/XP and running some more modern games would violate it's period-correctness, but would make for (in my opinion) an interesting experimental and temporary change to post about in this thread.
  • It's also possible that I could obtain a cheap 4GB 680 and upgrade to that, which would make Windows 10 gaming slightly more viable, but I'd only go for it if I found a suitably priced offer.
  • I could also try and get my hands on a comparable AMD GPU offering (such as an HD 7970) and benchmark it for comparisons between it and the 680 for suitable games.
  • Adding a second 680 for SLI would be a fun thing to tinker with, if the right card at the right price showed up. Ideally I'd have a second unit of the exact GPU, but I don't imagine finding another one that easily.

Fin

All in all, I'm incredibly happy with the build, and I absolutely love using it whenever I can, for both XP and 7 gaming! It gives me great performance for both operating systems in all the games I've intended to play on it, and it looks quite nice. I hope you like it as well! I'm fully open to suggestions and feedback, and I would also love to hear about related builds or stories about your gaming experiences from 2012-13 and/or general era of Windows 7 or even XP PC gaming. Thank you for reading this thread. 😀

Reply 1 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

<reserved for benchmarks, currently have a few planned out and am getting them set up>

Reply 2 of 19, by CC-Adam

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Really nice first build 👍 should do the job nicely. 3770K what a great CPU, still perfectly good for general use now with windows 10 but a fantastic way to experience XP in my opinion. I've got a similar 1155 machine although it's just i5 with a750ti but I'm really pleased with it.

Overclocking can be great fun and you've certainly got the cooler and mobo for it! If you don't go crazy with voltages these CPUs are incredibly resilient just go in small increments you can't really go wrong! 😁

Reply 3 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
CC-Adam wrote on 2025-07-09, 19:16:

Really nice first build 👍 should do the job nicely. 3770K what a great CPU, still perfectly good for general use now with windows 10 but a fantastic way to experience XP in my opinion. I've got a similar 1155 machine although it's just i5 with a750ti but I'm really pleased with it.

Overclocking can be great fun and you've certainly got the cooler and mobo for it! If you don't go crazy with voltages these CPUs are incredibly resilient just go in small increments you can't really go wrong! 😁

Thank you for the kind words! I agree that the 3770K has honestly aged really well for general usage and it makes for a great little retro CPU.

I don't plan to go super crazy with my OC for now, I'm aiming for somewhere between 4-4.2 GHz, but if that's not enough, I could always try squeezing more out of it 😁

Reply 4 of 19, by Archer57

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Nice build.

Just a small comment - the "issues" with SSD on XP are vastly overblown and pretty much non-existant. When SSDs were first appearing on the market, smaller ones like 32-64GB, a lot of people were using XP so such configuration is even "period correct".

I find it genuinely amusing how much myths and misinformation surrounded SSDs back then and even now. For home user write endurance never mattered, yet people got so obsessed about it... Stuff like XP defragmentation or even TRIM support never mattered all that much either, but there was (and still is) so much fearmongering about defragmentation being death sentence to an SSD...

There was all this talk of disabling swap, disabling some FS features like access times... Then later, on vista/7, disabling prefetch/superfetch, etc. Whole "optimization guides" or even tools/scripts... and everything useless at best, but more commonly - harmful.

The only things to really care about is creating partition table with newer OS (7?) which'll get alignment right, everything else will work just fine. Lack of TRIM will eventually reduce write performance and increase wear, but performance will still be great and wear does not matter...

SLI... it is a fun thing to play around with, but not very practical. You get more FPS, but also more lag, it is just how the stuff works. Also a pair of 680 would be a pain to cool so that they do not die. IMO your conclusion that it is not worth the hassle is absolutely correct.

For boot - if you create a partition somewhere and install some version of linux, like mint, it'll install GRUB and will make a boot menu with both versions of windows for you. Just an option how to do it the lazy way... Though there may be complications with UEFI here too, to bypass those i generally prefer to just install 7 without using UEFI boot/GPT...

Reply 5 of 19, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
limemyth wrote on 2025-07-09, 12:45:

I think it is important to establish that I grew up in a different era of PC gaming and PCs in general, much later than the generally discussed eras on this forum. I have quite fond memories (wouldn't call it nostalgia, at least not yet 😉) of the early 2010s, and particularly the year 2012. Why? While it seemingly isn't anything special on the surface, it is a year I hold a strong sentiment for when it comes to PC gaming and my early gaming years.

So I gave this build another purpose: Being a top-of-the-line and period-correct 2012 gaming PC.

While it may not sound as impressive or as retro as most of the other builds on the forum, I personally view it as an interesting concept to take on for a build.

I think your just one of the first of the next era of computers, does seem to be about 15-20 years after a certain date that nostalgia kicks in and that era starts to become popular.
And all of this is personal so if 2012 is your special year then that's totally fine.

Personally Windows 7 doesn't interest me but I can fully appreciate the XP side of things and your hardware choice makes for a very nice XP build.
Native EAX support alone is enough of a reason to dual boot IMHO.

I understand the desire for SLI "just for fun" more then any real gain.
I did something similar for a Crossfire setup. The good thing is system is still usable as is, so I just created an alert in ebay anytime someone posted a Radeon HD 4890. It took about 2 years until I got a 2nd matching card at a fair price but I wasn't in a rush either.

Reply 6 of 19, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
chinny22 wrote on 2025-07-10, 06:18:
I think your just one of the first of the next era of computers, does seem to be about 15-20 years after a certain date that nos […]
Show full quote

I think your just one of the first of the next era of computers, does seem to be about 15-20 years after a certain date that nostalgia kicks in and that era starts to become popular.
And all of this is personal so if 2012 is your special year then that's totally fine.

Personally Windows 7 doesn't interest me but I can fully appreciate the XP side of things and your hardware choice makes for a very nice XP build.
Native EAX support alone is enough of a reason to dual boot IMHO.

I understand the desire for SLI "just for fun" more then any real gain.
I did something similar for a Crossfire setup. The good thing is system is still usable as is, so I just created an alert in ebay anytime someone posted a Radeon HD 4890. It took about 2 years until I got a 2nd matching card at a fair price but I wasn't in a rush either.

For me the golden era is 1998 - 2008 since 2009 😀.
EAX is indeed something else! I have started playing the games from those years again with Audigy2/X-fi cards and it really sound different.
I could never make SLI work! I got several 7900 GTX/8800 GTX and so on and I could never passed beyond synthetic benchmarks. It seems so stuttery and messy I gave up!

Reply 7 of 19, by konc

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

OK, I'll take this thread as the sign to finally upgrade my main PC that's based on a 3770!

Reply 8 of 19, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Did you buy a delidded 3770K ? Intel used a thermal paste for heat transfer from die to heatspreader and that thermal paste must be in terrible shape after 13 years. It would be worth it to replace it.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, Yamaha SM718 ISA
Athlon 64 3400+, Gigabyte GA-K8NE, 2GB RAM, GeForce GTX 260 896MB, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Phenom II X6 1100, Asus 990FX, 32GB RAM, GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Reply 9 of 19, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
konc wrote on 2025-07-10, 07:40:

OK, I'll take this thread as the sign to finally upgrade my main PC that's based on a 3770!

My work system is a Core 2 quad Q9650! IT must be the oldest machine used as a daily driver on the forum!

Reply 10 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Archer57 wrote on 2025-07-10, 02:24:

Nice build.

Just a small comment - the "issues" with SSD on XP are vastly overblown and pretty much non-existant. When SSDs were first appearing on the market, smaller ones like 32-64GB, a lot of people were using XP so such configuration is even "period correct".

Thank you! I do understand that outside of partition alignment, there's no real risk of running SSDs on XP. 😀 I might consider getting a smaller 120GB for XP in the future. Currently the hard drive is there mostly because it's what I happened to have on hand, so it was the most convenient option.

Archer57 wrote on 2025-07-10, 02:24:

SLI... it is a fun thing to play around with, but not very practical. You get more FPS, but also more lag, it is just how the stuff works. Also a pair of 680 would be a pain to cool so that they do not die. IMO your conclusion that it is not worth the hassle is absolutely correct.

For boot - if you create a partition somewhere and install some version of linux, like mint, it'll install GRUB and will make a boot menu with both versions of windows for you. Just an option how to do it the lazy way... Though there may be complications with UEFI here too, to bypass those i generally prefer to just install 7 without using UEFI boot/GPT...

I figured SLI would lead to FPS issues, I remember reading about them some time ago. Also interesting information about Linux, I may experiment with getting that going for a nice boot menu.

chinny22 wrote on 2025-07-10, 06:18:
I think your just one of the first of the next era of computers, does seem to be about 15-20 years after a certain date that nos […]
Show full quote

I think your just one of the first of the next era of computers, does seem to be about 15-20 years after a certain date that nostalgia kicks in and that era starts to become popular.
And all of this is personal so if 2012 is your special year then that's totally fine.

Personally Windows 7 doesn't interest me but I can fully appreciate the XP side of things and your hardware choice makes for a very nice XP build.
Native EAX support alone is enough of a reason to dual boot IMHO.

I understand the desire for SLI "just for fun" more then any real gain.
I did something similar for a Crossfire setup. The good thing is system is still usable as is, so I just created an alert in ebay anytime someone posted a Radeon HD 4890. It took about 2 years until I got a 2nd matching card at a fair price but I wasn't in a rush either.

It is crazy to me that 2012 was nearly 15 years ago at this point, but it is true that it is reasonable for nostalgia to start ramping up at this point. EAX support was definitely a major reason for me dualbooting XP, outside of the OS experience itself (I'm quite fond of it). I'm not sure how reliable ALchemy really is with certain games, so I think just using XP is a much safer bet for EAX.

AlexZ wrote on 2025-07-10, 07:57:

Did you buy a delidded 3770K ? Intel used a thermal paste for heat transfer from die to heatspreader and that thermal paste must be in terrible shape after 13 years. It would be worth it to replace it.

Unfortunately I did not, it was just a bog standard 3770K. I didn't know you could get them pre-delidded tho, I might definitely look into it when heat transfer becomes an issue, especially with OC.

Reply 11 of 19, by Alexraptor

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

This one brought a smile to my face, since I also run a Z77 Sabertooth + i7-3770K combo. 😀

I actually dual boot Windows XP and 10 and here it's actually pretty fun to play around with multi-GPU/SLI as in Windows XP the second GPU can be used as a dedicated PhysX card, for some titles like Mirrors Edge.

Reply 12 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Alexraptor wrote on 2025-07-10, 21:57:

This one brought a smile to my face, since I also run a Z77 Sabertooth + i7-3770K combo. 😀

I actually dual boot Windows XP and 10 and here it's actually pretty fun to play around with multi-GPU/SLI as in Windows XP the second GPU can be used as a dedicated PhysX card, for some titles like Mirrors Edge.

It's a really good combo of a well-made motherboard and great CPU 😀 I always find the option of dedicating an entire GPU to just PhysX very funny, but it's also a cool option and I'm glad you can do it.

Reply 13 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
limemyth wrote on 2025-07-09, 12:46:

<reserved for benchmarks, currently have a few planned out and am getting them set up>

Unfortunately I'm a bonehead so I didn't realize I couldn't edit it later. I don't know who to contact to get it changed, so I'll put it here for now.

I did a few 3DMark runs and simple game benchmarks (I'm not a good benchmark person 😜) to get an idea of the performance. They can be found in the attachments. F.E.A.R. was run on max details at 1440x1080 and Half-Life 2 (OG 2004 version) was benchmarked with a playthrough of the first map of the "Route Kanal" chapter and run on max details in 1920x1080.

Some benchmarks that don't have screenshots and were made "unofficially":

  • Grand Theft Auto III: 600-800 FPS driving around Portland on max details at 1440x1080
  • Grand Theft Auto: Vice City: 400-600 FPS driving around Ocean Beach on max details at 1440x1080
  • Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas: 100-110 FPS driving around in starting area and while flying in a jet on max details at 1440x1080
  • Battlefield 3: 70-80 FPS in a few ground combat missions, 100-120 fps in a jet fighter mission, max details at 1920x1080

You're welcome to suggest games with built-in benchmarks or other games to benchmark that would make sense to test for either or both the operating systems installed and the hardware.

Reply 14 of 19, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Have a look at Re: Any love for AM2? for games from Vista era with built-in benchmarks. 3d mark 2001 isn't really useful. Better than looking at opaque score is looking at individual game fps in 1600x1200 or 1920x1080 (almost the same area).

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, Yamaha SM718 ISA
Athlon 64 3400+, Gigabyte GA-K8NE, 2GB RAM, GeForce GTX 260 896MB, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Phenom II X6 1100, Asus 990FX, 32GB RAM, GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Reply 15 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thank you for the link, will take a look! I agree that 2001 isn't a useful benchmark, it was mostly just for fun more than anything 😜

Reply 16 of 19, by Martli

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Nice work on this, that’s a solid build. I personally reckon these type of builds are perfect for XP gaming and I expect to see more of these. Joesph_joestar’s is another good example. Crazy to think this hardware came out 11/12 years after XP was launched and retained compatibility, I guess Vista was just a piece of shit… that helped me ditched windows for Mac OS back in 2009 at least!

I have a similar build (i5-3470 and a 670) that I dual boot with XP and win10. I have recently bought a 3770K though so will be upgrading when I can be bothered. Win XP covers off my old CD games from the era (plus nostalgia and EAX) and I use win10 to run my (mostly old) GOG games and the odd newer boomer shooter (also via GOG). I can also do all my retro PC maintenance on it, like transferring files to and formatting my drives etc (but now looking to migrate that to another system).

Fenrir Pentium MMX 166 | Voodoo1 | YMF719 | AWE64 | SC-88ST pro | MT-32
Neptune PIII 600 | Voodoo3 | Vortex 2 | YMF719
Thor P4 3.0ghz | 4200ti | Audigy 2 | YMF 754
Jupiter i5 3470 | GTX 670 | X-Fi

Reply 17 of 19, by limemyth

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Martli wrote on Today, 09:07:

Nice work on this, that’s a solid build. I personally reckon these type of builds are perfect for XP gaming and I expect to see more of these. Joesph_joestar’s is another good example. Crazy to think this hardware came out 11/12 years after XP was launched and retained compatibility, I guess Vista was just a piece of shit… that helped me ditched windows for Mac OS back in 2009 at least!

I have a similar build (i5-3470 and a 670) that I dual boot with XP and win10. I have recently bought a 3770K though so will be upgrading when I can be bothered. Win XP covers off my old CD games from the era (plus nostalgia and EAX) and I use win10 to run my (mostly old) GOG games and the odd newer boomer shooter (also via GOG). I can also do all my retro PC maintenance on it, like transferring files to and formatting my drives etc (but now looking to migrate that to another system).

Thank you! I agree that Ivy Bridge and a late XP-compatible GPU makes for a fantastic platform to play XP games on, and it was that type of build (as well as Joseph's specifically 😀) that inspired me to build mine with this use case in mind. The versatility of XP, 7 and 10 all on the same PC with fully compatible drivers cannot be understated. Glad to know yours works as well as it does for you!

I think the reputation Vista got was unfair, especially after it became a much better OS to use by the time SP1 rolled around, but I do think its rocky launch and quirks led to XP being supported for longer than originally planned/anticipated. Netbooks and other such devices that used XP well after Vista's release might have also contributed to that.

Reply 18 of 19, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I would say Vista was initially ahead of its time but the hardware wasn't ready for it. After Windows 7 was released Microsoft never backported interesting features such as TRIM support. DirectX 10, introduced in Vista had very limited support for multithreading. It was very quickly superseded and Microsoft wanted people to migrate to Windows 7 once it came out.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, Yamaha SM718 ISA
Athlon 64 3400+, Gigabyte GA-K8NE, 2GB RAM, GeForce GTX 260 896MB, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Phenom II X6 1100, Asus 990FX, 32GB RAM, GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Reply 19 of 19, by Matth79

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ideally, leave some unpartitioned space on an XP SSD, as well as creating an aligned partition with 7 or later. Without trim, the SSD will remember every filesystem block that has been used as being valid, so it can reach a not full but full situation where recovering blocks to use becomes slow and causes write amplification. Unused space in the partition does help, but if the system spends a long time in NOT reusing deleted filesystem blocks, more blocks can end up as SSD used / filesystem unused. Unpartitioned space means a guaranteed filter area of blocks that can never be filesystem used. Yes, you can PROBABLY survive ok regardless, if the drive never touches the last 20% IN the partition