VOGONS


Problem with EDO ram

Topic actions

First post, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hi everyone. I bought four 128MB RAMs for my IBM Pentium Pro. Unfortunately, I discovered that the notches don't match. However, I read that the 3.3V is correct. The one that doesn't match is buffered/unbuffered, so it won't fit in the socket. However, from what I read, the computer accepts both types of RAM. The one I received (and it works) is Kingstone, while the one that doesn't fit in the socket is the original IBM branded one.

In your opinion, since it should accept both buffered and unbuffered, if I filed down the notch a little to make it fit, would it work?

Reply 1 of 6, by bertrammatrix

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Mmm no, I would not advise filing it to fit, though someone on here may correct me on that since I don't have much knowledge about buffered ram (especially edo in dimm format). Keying is usually there to stop bad things from happening. Just that the ram says IBM on it doesn't mean it's meant to work in that machine in particular.

I'd recommend just getting unbuffered, my understanding is that buffered isn't needed in home use, and generally is somewhat slower so people for the most part avoid it

Reply 2 of 6, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

"For home use"?

Buffering isn't a data reliability feature like parity/ECC, it's an electrical feature used to reduce the load on the memory controller and so allowing it to drive more chips. That's pretty fundamental to board design, so I'm surprised to see a claim that a board is able to accept both buffered and unbuffered.

OP, where did you read the claim that your system accepts both buffered and unbuffered memory? Because your DIMM slots are keyed for unbuffered and that normally means it will only accept that kind.

Reply 3 of 6, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Usually when they did that, from about 1999-2004ish, they meant you could use 512 or 768MB unbuffered, but more than that had to be buffered. So had the drive strength for 2 to 3 DIMMs/ranks, but more than 3 needed to be buffered.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 4 of 6, by bertrammatrix

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
BitWrangler wrote on 2025-10-02, 03:14:

Usually when they did that, from about 1999-2004ish, they meant you could use 512 or 768MB unbuffered, but more than that had to be buffered. So had the drive strength for 2 to 3 DIMMs/ranks, but more than 3 needed to be buffered.

There you go. I think amongst others 440bx boards were like that, or, "officially" anyway. In practice they could often handle more without needing to use buffered but obviously reliability may suffer

Reply 5 of 6, by AlessandroB

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sorry, in my little experience with this type of ram I got confused in my head and thought that buffered/unbuffered was something like ecc/non ecc where if you install an ecc ram without the mainbord requesting it, it simply treats it as if it were non ecc

Reply 6 of 6, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I am not sure if you can mix unbuffered and buffered though, never came up for me. The ECC thing can be weird too, there's some consumer boards that are set up to refuse to work if they detect ECC, intel being the primary offender, but sometimes if you put in a non-ECC stick with them, they work. As non-ECC of course.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.