Reply 600 of 606, by peterfirefly
BinaryDemon wrote on Yesterday, 15:04:What workload/benchmark would you like tested? I always found I had to do a lot of DosBox testing because low end systems would mask performance issues by dropping video frames or audio. Not sure if MartyPC would do the same.
I have a celeron N3350 4gb ram with integrated graphics running Win10. I probably even have some dual core atom thin clients in my basement.
Just having MartyPC boot ordinary DOS with CGA might be a challenge for that machine. Just sitting at the A> prompt with a blinking cursor might be.
This is the microarchitecture:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldmont
It's the first Atom microarchitecture that has out-of-order execution but it isn't very wide or deeep.
This is Intel's page about that specific CPU:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/produ … ifications.html
Here are Geekbench's scores:
https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-celeron-n3350
For comparison, here's my i3-7100U (Kaby Lake microarch) that used to be on the slower end for MartyPC (older versions):
https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-core-i3-7100u
and my current AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (Zen 4) that should be very nice (haven't tested MartyPC with it yet):
https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/amd-ryzen-5-8640hs
This is what a Raspberry Pi 5 can deliver: