C. ULI
D. nforce4

12. same 1280*1024 + sound:
A. nforce3
B. VIA

C. ULI
D. nforce4

The PCI-express platform remains on top!
13. For those with the ultimate retro monitors - either LCD or CRT: 1600*1200 sound disabled
A. nforce3
B. VIA

C. ULI
D. nforce4

14. Most demanding settings: 1600*1200 max details, sound enabled:
A. nforce3
B. VIA

C. ULI
D. nforce4

Aquamark3 is owned by the nforce4 as it leads across all resolutions and settings even if by tiny margins!
15. We begin testing 3dmark and the first version is 2000. Default settings first.
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

I would like to point out that in directx7 and directx8 - 3dmark 2000 & 2001 - nforce4 leads by a large margin with both Clawhammer and Newcastle!
Also it is obvious if you have followed the topic that a CPU with a larger cache has a 6-8% advantage over the one with less, so for directx 7 & 8 games Clawhammer is highly preferable!
16. 3dmark 2000 - 1280*1024
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4