Hoping wrote on 2026-01-16, 00:28:Regardless of the operating system, there are applications and services that can benefit from all available RAM. Not to mention […]
Show full quote
Robin4 wrote on 2026-01-15, 22:05:That amount of memory is only needed when using windows 10 / 11
With CachyOS it is use way less memory.
The memory is not the pr […]
Show full quote
Hoping wrote on 2025-12-22, 12:42:
I'm not surprised either, as the amount of RAM has been stagnant for years. Back in 2010, I installed 16GB of DDR3 for the Phenom II 1100T because it was cheap. Nowadays, 64 GB is considered a lot, but in my opinion, that's ridiculous. 64 GB should be considered the minimum today, 128 GB should be acceptable, 256 GB should be standard, and 512 GB should be for enthusiasts. The same goes for consumer SSDs, which have been pretty much stagnant at a maximum of 4 TB in general.
In these respects, hardware has been very stagnant. It is normal for such a strong software advance as AI to suffer from this stagnation. And to show a great imbalance.
That amount of memory is only needed when using windows 10 / 11
With CachyOS it is use way less memory.
The memory is not the problem, but your MS OS is.
Regardless of the operating system, there are applications and services that can benefit from all available RAM. Not to mention modified video games; I've seen one game I play easily consume 48 GB of RAM. I don't know why every discussion has to end up talking about whether Linux, with its multitude of non-standardized distributions, is better than Windows.
It really irritates me that we always end up like this. Well, Linux is the holy grail that will end all evils and lower the price of RAM and Flash memory. Let's pray to the god Tux.
I'm not a Windows fan, but I am a fan of things that work. Now seriously, the problem isn't the software we use, it's the manufacturers' speculation. They found an excuse to do it, and they did.
I don't have problems with insufficient RAM on my computers, so I don't need to worry about that—a lesson learned from the 90s.
I am not speaking about operating systems at all (I use Windows myself and have near zero interest in Linux)... but to be fair, saying that there are applications and services that benefit from all available RAM is a far cry from saying that 256GB should be the standard (meaning, for normal users).
What data is supposed to be filling this RAM, who was supposed to design the silicon that could process that information efficiently and where are we getting all of the electricity to power these devices? And how on earth is that even supposed to translate to mobile? Do you expect people to have 16x the RAM, storage and processing power in their desktops vs their laptops? How could developers possibly create efficient games and programs to work in that kind of ecosystem? And where are we supposed to dump all of the hardware that is obsolete every 6 months as system requirements balloon arbitrarily? The E-waste mess is going to be bad enough with all of the computers that can't support Windows 11 being dumped into landfills. If it happened every year or two it would be a global catastrophe in no time... 😅
Personally, I think it's great that Windows 10\11 is usable for people who are saddled with systems that only have 4GB soldered RAM and a 128GB soldered SSD. A relative of mine has an otherwise nice laptop with those specs alongside a Ryzen 3 4300U. For my needs it is hopelessly limited on what it can do comfortably, but they only use it for Zoom meetings, checking email and doing online shopping... it handles those just fine. I'd rather that every system have at least 8GB of RAM if it was made after 2015, but if the systems exist, it is a good thing that software doesn't demand several times that just to function.
Anyway, sorry, I just genuinely don't understand the reasoning behind saying that there is something wrong with the world because we don't need 8-16 times as much RAM just to get by. There is plenty wrong with the world, and I don't think that's in the top 10,000.