I went through most of my old optical drive collection. The main purpose was to get organized and take an inventory, but I also wanted to see if I can make any reliability hypothesis from the stats to share here. That mostly consisted of connecting a power supply only and checking drive tray open/close functionality.
I tried to focus on drives I have in quantity, with a known history, to assess based on design/engineering/materials quality. Most of mine were diverted from recycling, at a former IT job on a college campus. I pulled them from professor/staff PC's - it is unlikely that any were heavily used in this setting, and they were not subject to potential abuse in computer labs. The IT target refresh cycle was 3 years, so most of them were retired after no more than 3~4 years. I used a handful of them lightly for various retro PC builds over the years, but a majority were stored in boxes/totes in a climate-controlled basement. In other words, this might be as close to a best case scenario for secondhand vintage optical drives. Any perceived long-reliability is not like to apply for drives that experienced a rough life (E.g., used for a decade in dusty/smokey environment, abandoned in hot/humid storage, physically tossed into trash/recycling, then rescued and resold.) I'm doubt I have enough data to draw any solid statistical conclusions, but hopefully it is somewhat useful.
The attachment PXL_20260319_124510501.jpg is no longer available
There are 39 drives, all 5.25" internal, motorized tray load, IDE. I excluded SATA, SCSI, MKE, etc - I don't have many of these anyway.
Mitsumi CRMC-FX400D (CD-ROM 4x)
All are manufactured Aug-Oct 1995, Gateway 2000 OEM P/N CDRQDR001AAUS or CDRIDE012AAWW
6 Total
100% working tray open/close, but 1 of them was noticeably slower.
I randomly picked 1, put it in a retro build (Pentium 200 MMX) and played several games (including mixed-mode w/ redbook audio) without issue over the last month.
I opened one briefly - this appears to be a belt-free design, which a magnet-based center spindle clamp.
At 4x, the drive spinning is fairly quiet, but the laser seek is on the loud side.
Toshiba XM-6202B & XM-6302B (CD-ROM 32x)
I grouped these 2 models together, as I cannot find any meaningful difference in design, specification or HW rev #. Only the ROM version differs.
All manufactured Jan-Aug 1998, Gateway 2000 OEM
10 Total (4* 6202, 6* 6302)
100% working tray open/close* (see below)
All but 1 sound "crunchy" while the tray is moving, and honestly, I remember pretty much all of them sounding this way across campus.
I selected a random XM-6302B to open and investigate. The good news - this is another belt-free design, magnet spindle. The bad news - the noise is due to a cracked tray motor gear, the white one:
The attachment PXL_20260322_160228322.jpg is no longer available
Based on how widespread the tray noise is, both present and past, I can only assume the gear was flawed or fragile from the start. There is no impact functionality though - all of them open/close the tray just fine. Staying functional long-term is a big unknown.
I do NOT recommend attempting any further disassembly or DIY repair. Carefully removing, inspecting, and reinstalling the gear caused enough friction loss to cause slip and tray jam. I have decades of physical media device repair experience, and unfortunately these press-fit gears rarely do well after a glue repair. I have reproduced other similar gears, but I don't know if it would warrant such an effort, especially with devices like the PicoIDE coming out.
DVS DSR-600H (DVD-ROM 6x)
I only have 3 of them, all have Mar 1999 manufacture dates.
100% working tray open/close.
Unknown design - I haven't opened to see if it uses belts or spindle clamp type.
I have 11 more Toshiba drives that I need to verify model and test. 7 are installed in a CD-ROM network server, that I forgot I built, and the 4 others I see installed in some of my other old builds.
So far, I have come up with the follow hypotheses:
1. Belt-free designs are more likely to survive long-term
2. Older drive models are more likely to be over-engineered, or put another way, less subject to cost-cutting design decisions.
3. The evolution to higher speeds (and spindle RPM) necessitated revisions to disc spindle clamping design. The was a transition from magnet-based spindle clamping to soft/sticky materials was a downgrade in terms of long-term tray ejection reliability. (I wish I could find out a more exact date or model introduction)
songoffall wrote on 2026-04-26, 13:51:
As luck would have it, I got another batch of old optical drives and I can confirm one of the gears on a LiteOn SOHR-5238S CD-RW drive has severe yellowing, unlike the other nylon gears that are pristine white, proving it is made of a different plastic.
I usually see this type of yellowing on the belt wheel, like on an Asus DVD-E616P2 from the same batch.
Funnily enough, the faceplates of these drives show little to no yellowing.
Interesting coincidence - I just found a Lite-On DVD+R drive. It is an internal IDE drive, but without the outer metal casing, it came out of a Lite-On DVD video player/recorder that I purchased new 2004~2005. Now that I'm thinking about it, I remember the tray getting jammed due to a sticky spindle clamp after only a couple years. I remember picking up a cheap internal replacement, that also jammed up a couple years later.
I haven't looked inside yet.
As for your gears - I have seen softer materials used for gears to reduce noise, which are often the first materials to break down. For example - Onkyo used a some type of material for a gear that is notorious for turning brittle (or almost liquid) in a series of 1980's turntable automatic tonearm mechanisms.