VOGONS


EAX appreciation thread

Topic actions

Reply 1140 of 1152, by Dipshidian

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
such wrote on 2026-05-24, 19:04:

Some of the games on that list... don't even exist (X-Com: Alliance?), so always take it with a grain of salt. A3D 3.0 AFAIK also doesn't exist. Perhaps planned, but by that time Creative had already brutalized Aureal.

Wasn't Messiah a game with A3D 3.0 support? I think it makes use of the whole A3DVerb "non-modelled" (i.e. "EAX-like") reverb engine that came with the 2048 drivers (I think? Either that or 2041). Perhaps it's possible that I'm misremembering something, but I'm fairly sure I flipped between A3D and EAX and recall both settings having EAX-style reverb (with A3D having the typically pronounced positioning as well).
I also tried the Soldier of Fortune demo, yet I don't recall an A3D 3.0 option. Maybe that was only in the full retail version?

Your friendly source of public-domain PC game video captures on period-correct hardware! Youtube: @dipshidian

Reply 1141 of 1152, by RetroGamer4Ever

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
such wrote on 2026-05-24, 19:04:
AndreaColombo86 wrote on 2026-05-24, 15:34:
Thank you for that list. I was unaware A3D 3.0 existed. What we could have had…! […]
Show full quote

Thank you for that list. I was unaware A3D 3.0 existed. What we could have had…!

Some games are reported as having A3D 3.0 support but I doubt that’s true. The standard was released shortly before Aureal closed up shop.

Also, some of the games in the list inaccurately report supporting A3D 2.0 (e.g. Baldur’s Gate 2).

There are games I could be interested in if they actually supported A3D 2.0:

- Neverwinter Nights
- Unreal 2
- Unreal Tournament

Does anybody know whether they do support it?

Apologies for derailing the thread with something only tangentially related, but I figured most audio aficionados who would know this stuff would hang around here.

Joseph—so it’s not like I can install the latest driver and call it a day?

Some of the games on that list... don't even exist (X-Com: Alliance?), so always take it with a grain of salt. A3D 3.0 AFAIK also doesn't exist. Perhaps planned, but by that time Creative had already brutalized Aureal.

A3D 3.0 did exist and Aureal had a deluxe soundcard offering to "push it", but it was really just the Vortex 2 chip connected to a 100MHz DSP, to handle the "premium digital audio" functions, even though Aureal had their own unused DSP design for that. Some people have managed to acquire A3D 3.0 engineering/test hardware and finalized cards that made it out of the wreckage of Aureal. Creative currently has no legal claim to anything that Aureal had, so it's possible to reverse engineer the Aureal stuff and do whatever we want with it, which at least one forum member had been doing back in the 2010's.

Reply 1142 of 1152, by such

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thanks for clarifying. It's right on the edge of what I'd call... "existing", but interesting info nonetheless.

Reply 1143 of 1152, by AndreaColombo86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

EDIT: deleted

Last edited by AndreaColombo86 on 2026-05-25, 10:50. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 1144 of 1152, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AndreaColombo86 wrote on 2026-05-25, 10:35:

This is what A3D 3.0 would have brought to the table according to AI:

Using AI for getting retro PC gaming information often leads to inaccuracies. If you can't find a hard source, it might be better refrain from posting AI slop here. As the very post on this forum can be referenced as a "source" by some future AI search, leading to even more inaccuracies.

Also, a lot of people here frown upon the use of AI, myself included. You're less likely to receive help from people who have actual first-hand knowledge about a subject if you resort to AI "information". For my part, I'd rather not pollute this thread with AI slop, so please keep it to a minimum here.

My retro builds

Reply 1145 of 1152, by AndreaColombo86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

My apologies. I’ve deleted the post.

Reply 1146 of 1152, by AndreaColombo86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

So here’s a question: has anybody tried Unreal II on Win98SE?

On the Vogons Wiki it says it supports EAX 3.0 via OpenAL. Now, my Audigy 2 ZS definitely supports EAX 3.0, but I don’t know whether OpenAL was ever a thing on Win98SE.

Reply 1147 of 1152, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AndreaColombo86 wrote on Today, 16:41:

So here’s a question: has anybody tried Unreal II on Win98SE?

On the Vogons Wiki it says it supports EAX 3.0 via OpenAL. Now, my Audigy 2 ZS definitely supports EAX 3.0, but I don’t know whether OpenAL was ever a thing on Win98SE.

Games which used OpenAL usually shipped the required binaries on the disc. I haven't actually tried an OpenAL game under Win9x, so I can't say how that would go. It's possible that you may need to install WDM drivers in order for OpenAL to work under Win9x, but I don't know for sure. Those drivers are suboptimal for Win9x gaming when playing certain titles made before 2001 or so.

Personally, I make 2001 the cutoff point for Win9x gaming. Anything released in 2002 and later, I play under WinXP or on a newer Windows version. Maybe there's some edge case out there, but so far, I haven't found a reason to run games which use DX8 or DX9 under Win9x.

My retro builds

Reply 1148 of 1152, by AndreaColombo86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thanks for your reply. I’m going to give it a try and we’ll see if it works.

Is there a preferred driver version for the Audigy 2 ZS under Win98SE? I reckon I should get a VxD driver, but I assume there are several 😅

Reply 1149 of 1152, by Sombrero

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Unreal II's EAX implementation isn't all that great, two years ago I tried it with two different systems and got audio pops with both. Having EAX on only made it worse so I turned it off and I don't remember noticing any missing sound effects.

In my experience Unreal 2 engine games in general aren't much of EAX showcases, they got positional audio and some occlusion effects but I personally haven't exactly been blown away by their accelerated audio.

Reply 1150 of 1152, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AndreaColombo86 wrote on Today, 17:02:

Is there a preferred driver version for the Audigy 2 ZS under Win98SE? I reckon I should get a VxD driver, but I assume there are several 😅

Under Win9x, the official Audigy 2 ZS installation CD will install WDM drivers by default. Running Creative's Driver Utility after that provides a way of switching to VxD drivers. That's the official method.

I wrote an unofficial guide which allows for direct installation of VxD drivers, but it's aimed toward advanced users, and can be difficult to follow for others.

My retro builds

Reply 1151 of 1152, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Sombrero wrote on Today, 17:15:

In my experience Unreal 2 engine games in general aren't much of EAX showcases, they got positional audio and some occlusion effects but I personally haven't exactly been blown away by their accelerated audio.

Thief: Deadly Shadows is an UE 2 game. 😉

Not sure if you include UE 2.5 in that, but if so, UT 2004 with the EAX 5.0 patch sounded pretty good to me. But only after I turned off the awful dynamic music and the crappy new weapon sounds.

My retro builds

Reply 1152 of 1152, by Sombrero

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Joseph_Joestar wrote on Today, 17:29:

Thief: Deadly Shadows is an UE 2 game. 😉

Oh right, so it is. I guess that one is the outlier, I still haven't tried it but I trust your praise for its EAX is well earned.

Not sure if you include UE 2.5 in that, but if so, UT 2004 with the EAX 5.0 patch sounded pretty good to me. But only after I turned off the awful dynamic music and the crappy new weapon sounds.

Sure, but it did need a helping hand from Creative themselves to boost it up a bit later.