VOGONS


Reply 100 of 103, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Irinikus wrote on Today, 09:43:
Intel486dx33 wrote on Yesterday, 17:48:
You can put all the upgrades you want into that computers but in the end it’s still just a 486. So don’t expect to much. It’s ma […]
Show full quote

You can put all the upgrades you want into that computers but in the end it’s still just a 486.
So don’t expect to much.
It’s mainly for running DOS and Win3x
Even though Win95 was designed to support the 486-33 CPU.
It can just barely run win95, it still can’t play MP3, Quake, or Videos.
Unless you put the pentium overdrive into it.

The best CPU’s for windows 95 is the pentium class.

I'm not expecting the world from it, I just want it to be the best it can be.

Before the release of the pentium CPU’s. The 486 pretty much did run the world with DOS and Win3x.
I found out that DOS and Win3x, and Win95. Perform better on a Pentium CPU.
So I built a computer with Pentium 233 mmx CPU an was surprised just
How well Win3x and Win95 performed as opposed to the 486.
This is how a computer is supposed to perform.

Reply 101 of 103, by Irinikus

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Somehow I don't think you people understand that I have many other computers besides this one: (I'm not trying to brag here, but I'm just stating a point!)

These are my machines:

17721698453042ZbcPkNmbA1_portrait.jpg

17721698467888zubUalJ741_portrait.jpg

17721698481731kBnpIvkK31_portrait.jpg

17721698495611t3HN8lFFN1_portrait.jpg

17721698509558qHP9VD50H1_portrait.jpg

17721698523127SiOR0UvRK1_portrait.jpg

17721698536704ey2miLHCE1_portrait.jpg

17721698550828vCjUE2CtN1_portrait.jpg

17721698564726fnGmJ4yn81_portrait.jpg

17721698578766gJMkxHH6s1_portrait.jpg

17721698622976qDXRsrrr1_portrait.jpg

17721698639082Lzd6BAylm1_portrait.jpg

And I'm currently working on these two: (building and upgrading)

17721672538931phNzZetCV1_portrait.jpg

17865379329021jYfvaZOOv4_portrait.jpg

YouTube

Reply 102 of 103, by H3nrik V!

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
zapbuzz wrote on Today, 11:26:

I simply recommend do not overclock and do not expect a "Porsche from a Volkswagen"

I get your point, however, getting a Porsche for the price of a Volkswagen was exactly what the Celeron 300A did back in the late nineties. There were no drawbacks, it ran 450 for years and years.

If it's dual it's kind of cool ... 😎

--- GA586DX --- P2B-DS --- BP6 ---

Please use the "quote" option if asking questions to what I write - it will really up the chances of me noticing 😀

Reply 103 of 103, by H3nrik V!

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Irinikus wrote on Today, 09:45:
zapbuzz wrote on Yesterday, 20:12:
I just don't recommend overclocking a non gaming system IBM especially. It can be done but it doesn't last long. I owned one bac […]
Show full quote

I just don't recommend overclocking a non gaming system IBM especially.
It can be done but it doesn't last long.
I owned one back in the day.
I changed its BIOS serial number to "POTATO" being frustrated I couldn't turn a Volkswagen into a Porsche.
Still had some fun with shareware of the day.
The in-laws felt sorry for me and gave me another PC when the PSU caps popped from the overclock stress.
I was given a gaming pentium system and I ran windows 98SE with dialup internet those were the days of the wild west that was surprisingly trusting.

Surely if the CPU isn't being overvolted and the thermals are kept within acceptable limits then it shouldn't be a problem? (Apparently not all of these "POD's"are able to be overclocked or overclock well, so I might not be able to overclock it)

Even running at 83 MHz, it's still the best allrounder for this machine.

My own PODP5V83 doesn't even complete booting into Windows at 100MHz. Gotta modify that on-board VRM at some point 😎

If it's dual it's kind of cool ... 😎

--- GA586DX --- P2B-DS --- BP6 ---

Please use the "quote" option if asking questions to what I write - it will really up the chances of me noticing 😀