drama on
legluondunet wrote on Today, 19:31:
It's a shame; his career had been so promising up until now.
Eh, what "career"? And what "up until now"? Do you think I make living from dgvoodoo? No, it's just a hobby project which is a financial dumpster fire btw. I have a regular irl job.
legluondunet wrote on Today, 19:31:
DosFreak wrote on Today, 19:08:
Not to put words in his mouth but he did so because of you and those like you.
What are you saying? What does that even mean ?
No one forced him to insert malicious code into dgvoodoo2 to prevent Linux users from using dgvoodoo2 and thus prevent them from playing their games.
Actually, the attitude of the "community" did.
Even you at lutris, released a strippped dgvoodoo zip file 3 years or so ago despite that the redist rights said you had to host the original zip.
I remember, even some internal folder was renamed to "x32" inside that version. By the time I noticed it, it had been out for about a year.
And, as we know, closed source software is bad, evil, crap, slow, bloat, shit and whatever, that your "community" doesn't poke even with a stick.
But the most of that "community" are mere opportunists who respect nothing, just takes what they need and don't give a shit because they are entitled.
So, I thought it'd be better to have something that the "community" wouldn't redistribute by any chance because it does not work anyway.
legluondunet wrote on Today, 19:31:
What he did was despicable, there's no denying it.
No, it wasn't. I not only helped you and the "community" stick to their own principles (steer clear of closed source craps) but I also encouraged the development of alternatives (which the "community" is always bragging about) to replace the closed source shit.
So, actually I'm a cool guy, aren't I?
legluondunet wrote on Today, 19:31:
Now that these facts are out, he's going to alienate an entire community of gamers and developers.
Again? I'll just stick to the download numbers. If I see that there is interest for dgvoodoo then I'll continue it (in snail pace). If not then I simply close the project.
DosFreak wrote on Today, 19:08:
As you stated there are other wrappers out there so why worry about this one?
He forgot to reply this one but I do it for him:
Of course they don't need dgvoodoo. It's not a significant software on their platform, and it's not even particularly significant even on Windows regarding that the retro gaming segment itself is niche.
They just can't stand the fact that they have no control over it and does not own it in any form because dgvoodoo as a project does not fit the spirit of the times: everything must be open source, and the dev is just a puppet of the entitled "community". And if something is not liked then fork, fork and fork.
drama off